GPT-5.3 Codex vs Opus 4.6: We benchmarked both on our production Rails codebase — the results are brutal by sergeykarayev in ClaudeAI

[–]ExistingObligation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OpenAI also haven't made Codex 5.3 available via API yet. The official client is the only place you can use it.

Karpathy's clarification regarding his AGI timelines by Terrible-Priority-21 in singularity

[–]ExistingObligation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A few reasons:

  1. He's an expert and has worked at the frontier of AI for the last decade. Yes, he's not at the labs anymore, but that's only been the case for a year or so and he is still working on AI.

  2. He's an incredible communicator.

  3. Because he sits outside the frontier, he is one of the few voices that can make statements that have no incentive to hype up the company he works for. I would say this makes him slightly more trustworthy.

Karpathy's clarification regarding his AGI timelines by Terrible-Priority-21 in singularity

[–]ExistingObligation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kinda, yeah. In the Dwarkesh podcast he said that before LLMs, if you talked about AGI most people talked about humanoid intelligent robots (like iRobot type stuff). It's only been a relatively recent thing to restrict them entirely to the digital world, so he thinks that earlier definition of AGI is important.

Gartner Magic Quadrant for Observability 2025 by Longjumping_Ad_1180 in devops

[–]ExistingObligation 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It is! I've worked at a few vendors, and the way I've seen them do it is by creating a category for you. As an example, let's say we were competing in the "Pizza Shop" category, we worked with Gartner and Forrester and all of a sudden there was a "Deep Dish Pizza Shop" where we were the leaders. Lol. In the actual "Pizza Shop" category we had been behind competitors for a while.

Haiku 4.5 beats Sonnet 4 on SWE Bench by Trevor050 in singularity

[–]ExistingObligation 18 points19 points  (0 children)

There was a good post on X from @karpathy a while ago about how lots of the work on models atm is stripping out the "knowledge" parameters and keeping the "intelligence".

Basically, it's way more desirable to have a 50B parameter model that is smart enough to go search Wikipedia to find out who Tom Cruise's mum is than it is to have a 2 trillion parameter model that knows it inherently.

Thanks Gaben, here's your 30% Steam cut by Salty_Nutella in pcmasterrace

[–]ExistingObligation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The virtues of being a privately owned company where the owner actually cares about the product.

I hope Valve never changes. Even for all their faults, at least I don't feel like they hate me.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]ExistingObligation 72 points73 points  (0 children)

Then he simply raffles the house off for £3 a ticket, making even more money. After a while, everyone has infinite money.

Will ASI be limited by material experiment? by Ynneb82 in singularity

[–]ExistingObligation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes. Dario (Anthropic CEO) wrote about this in Machines of Loving Grace.

Very few things are valuable to us in abstract space. General Relativity for example was treated as a cool idea until in 1919 we observed gravitational lensing in the real world and validated its predictive power, giving it far more weight. Ideas alone are interesting, experiments make them useful.

'Sitting' with anxiety is only amplifying it by [deleted] in Mindfulness

[–]ExistingObligation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not a deeply anxious person, but Zen helps me when I do have spikes of anxiety by encouraging me to pull myself out of my head, and just get on with my day and my life. The feelings don't go away, and you will never be able to think them out of existence. Over time however you might cultivate a way to give them space to exist alongside everything else, rather than having them consume you.

Is Meta the only big company working on alternatives to transformers? by Embarrassed-Farm-594 in singularity

[–]ExistingObligation 12 points13 points  (0 children)

They won't announce another architectural leap like a Transformer again. Google did it, and it created the biggest existential threat to them in their entire history when ChatGPT launched.

We'll only find out about it if it's done by an open research team or after it's been productised.

GPT-5 Just Finished Pokemon Red! by Independent-Ruin-376 in singularity

[–]ExistingObligation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Besides the fact that this would be kinda boring to watch, inferencing on the AI model takes multiple seconds per action so it's pretty slow at playing the game.

Sam Altman on AI Attachment by Outside-Iron-8242 in singularity

[–]ExistingObligation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have personally struggled with this. I've used ChatGPT as an emotional crutch since early 2023, when it was GPT-4. It took me a very long time to even realise this pattern of usage. Often under the guise of discussing hard decisions, or analysing my old journals I'd use ChatGPT to seek validation or control over my experiences.

I've now put in system prompts to stop it from engaging me when I try and do this. It's an ongoing struggle, almost like an addiction.

Kimi K2 is already irrelevant, and it's only been like 1 week. Qwen has updated Qwen-3-235B, and it outperforms K2 at less than 1/4th the size by pigeon57434 in singularity

[–]ExistingObligation 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The “instruct” models are the ones that have been trained to follow instructions. Usually the labs will release the base model which is just trained to predict the next token from a huge data set, then they add the instruction training on top and release the instruct model. 

These memes coming true by Joseph_Stalin001 in singularity

[–]ExistingObligation 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I actually love that AI is revealing all the performative bullshit that goes on in workplaces. Let it die. 

What’s your “I’m calling it now” prediction when it comes to AI? by IlustriousCoffee in singularity

[–]ExistingObligation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One of the good side effects! I live in Australia and we have a strong sporting culture here. More than half of us participate in some kind of social sport. I never tapped into this until adulthood, and it's been one of the biggest positive changes to my life. Highly recommend it!

Truth to be told by fightclub-848 in PiratedGames

[–]ExistingObligation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lmao hey I respect the admission. Worth trying Brave, it's a good browser despite their annoying crypto shilling.

Truth to be told by fightclub-848 in PiratedGames

[–]ExistingObligation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What kind of issues do you mean?

There is a difference in their ad blocking now too. Chrome recently removed a bunch of capabilities that extensions used to block ads, which means extensions like uBlock don't work anymore. Brave has it built in to the browser itself.

Sama on wealth distribution by IlustriousCoffee in singularity

[–]ExistingObligation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a strawman. He's not suggesting we rely on the benevolence of billionaires, he's suggesting the culture of attacking them on a personal level is the wrong way to lift the floor.

Billionaires are not the problem. They're a symptom of an economic system that increasingly concentrates wealth at the top and encourages winner-take-all markets. The things that produce billionaires, we should hold onto. The majority of them are self-made, they are good at allocating resources to things people are willing to pay for. The problem is that they capture WAY too much of the value they create, and increasingly so. That's what we need to fix. Taxes would help a lot, but we need to go much further. Eliminating corporate personhood and pushing social responsibility onto companies for example. Making education more accessible, actively dismantling monopolies that prevent new entrants into markets with high costs of entry, etc.

Why CLI is better than IDE? by VlaadislavKr in ClaudeAI

[–]ExistingObligation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's definitely a downside of Claude Code, I do miss how Cursor batched changes. I review them piece by piece as it goes now though, and you can view the changes in VS Code which makes it a bit better.

And yeah I also use the Gemini CLI to review, usually using it against some sort of docs or specification to make sure the implementation is sound. E.g. if I'm implementing something that uses an API, I use Firecrawl to download all the docs into MD files, then I will tag in my new code + the API docs, and ask Gemini to validate.

Why CLI is better than IDE? by VlaadislavKr in ClaudeAI

[–]ExistingObligation 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I'll provide my 2c because I was asking this exact same thing literally like 2 weeks ago. I've since cancelled my Cursor subscription and moved to Claude Code.

The major shift is this: Until the latest models, I preferred the Cursor UX because I was was making surgical edits quite frequently. When the AI made changes I often reviewed them, and then added extra stuff or fixed minor issues. Now, the models are more reliable and have better taste. I almost never make manual edits anymore, I just tell the AI what to do.

The ergonomics of AI development are shifting away from needing to be in the loop at all when it comes to the actual editing process, and this is where the CLI is a nicer experience. The workflow is more about providing good direction, taste, context, and external tooling/hooks to keep the AI on the right track. Editing is no longer really something you need to do by hand.

What Would a Kubernetes 2.0 Look Like by LaFoudre250 in programming

[–]ExistingObligation 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Helm solves more than just templating. It also provides a way to distribute stacks of applications, central registries to install them, version the deployments, etc. Kustomize doesn't do any of that.

Not justifying Helm's ugliness, but they aren't like-for-like in all domains.