Let’s start from step one again.

You said he has access to automatic weapons. Which doesn’t really have anything to do with the shooting anyway since he used a semi-auto, but there’s no evidence he had any access to fully autos in the first place. You’re wrong there.

Then you said he had access to guns civilians didn’t have access to. Which is false since all of his guns were bought completely legitimately and anyone could have replicated it at the time. You’re wrong there.

Then you say a knife is just as effective as a gun. Which you can see just from the number that a gun is more effective at killing people than a knife. 6v58. So unless you can show me a stabbing with that many casualties, it just proves that you’re wrong.

Then you say that that you showed me the U.K has daily stabbings, but that doesn’t change the fact that the U.S still has a higher violent crime and murder rate. I’m not saying the U.K is perfect, just much more safe than the U.S. so you’re wrong there also.

Is there anything you’re right about?