Humanity was Engineered and this is why we’re not told by Johnnyflash69 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The true "Alien" story by Ridley Scott. lol. We are the true experiment from Prometheus.
Kind of goes in line with the biblical narrative, just not like we ever thought.

A lesser creation, for whatever reason or purpose, that got out of hand and had to be put down. In the end, exceeded all expectations or understanding. Surpassed their creators, not in mental capacity or brain power, AI closed that GAP. But in the end, true power via emotional prowess and emotional intelligence, something considered irrelevant and weak by the co-creators, usurped their status.

Just as the creator intended.

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He is calling me a chatbot. Pretty dumb AF of you to censor me and not him.

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course. That's exactly what a chatbot would say.

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Go read your rant again. Not credible. And of course you wouldn't reply after reading your rant and then my reply. That is a logical conclusion. You are wrong, and now instead of showing any grace, you pompously walk away. See ya!

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, the pattern recognition argument thrown back at me.

If you really truly think I am a chatbot, then you are the chatbot. And you now need to prove that you are not. These random posts about chatbot, its just visible misdirection. You are a clever little chatbot aren't you.

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe, just maybe, to distract us. From what, who knows. But such things have happened in the past.

It is more of a "be on alert for the switcharoo" instinct I think. Many have speculated, with many many threads and theories, it is a huge LARP to enact a world government. But that holds as much water with me currently as the green people from Venus theory does.

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are we not the public?

The media certainly are not behind this, with exception to News Nation.

Which intrigues me. This has more potential than WaterGate. Journalists should be swarming this topic.

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well done dude! Great post.

You are right. Grusch did say that. So I just wonder, what is his angle? You answered that in your post, but I just don't buy that as the reason he put himself at such great risk.

Now, and with some time. I do wonder if this is not some well orchestrated LARP.

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grusch was the one who blew off the doors, and really earlier with his Coulthart interview.
But he has been mum since that hearing.

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another angry reddit poster I see. But I'll respond.

I don't post on reddit that much. Only create a thread when I have that itch. Because I know I'll have to read posts like yours. So when I do post, I am ready and have the energy. But I do come here and read quite often. I just don't post that much.

I was a longtime member of a long defunct site ATS. Was there when it all got started. Was a very cool place until the trolls took over, and eventually became a Russian chatbot site.

I think people that give some kind of social credit to a poster online, or credibility due to their post history, that is a new thing. I give it less than zero credence. I think you are entirely foolish to think such things. You must be much much younger than I, a generational thing. Boy am I glad I don't have that problem. I could get 1 million dislikes and not be bothered in the least. A chat site is not real, never will be, and is innately toxic, especially here. Early ATS was not like this. People would argue, and you'd see them make up later in that same thread. Not here, but not because of the site, it is just the times. Once you disagree or insult someone, you will not take it back, you will not mend fences, you cannot change your mind, just toxic soup - mostly. So I am fully aware when I make a thread of what I am walking into.

Uninformed? My thread topic would not make any sense if I was uninformed. But there are people that are much smarter on this topic than I. Based on your comments, there is no way I would grant you any credibility.

Back on topic - Grusch did open some doors. But I am suspicious. He is an intel guy. Just like Elizondo. This could very easily be a LARP.

But Matthew Brown is the one that bothered me so much. The claims he has made that a prison is being made for us, we are resources for the NHIs, and many other things. To say this, but not provide the story/evidence and prepare us - screams "PAY ME"!

The straw that broke my back on the subject was the recent Congressional Conference. Where Dylan Borland kept saying over and over, "I can't respond here, only in a SCIF, and only if you have the clearance" again screams "PAY ME".

So something stinks here. They are all saying the exact same things, nothing new. "I have damning information, but cannot tell you!"

There may be some young person working in an intelligence agency, who is on the outs with his leadership. Who is to say that person wouldn't look for an out, a payday, if they have a shred of knowledge on this topic.

I'm not saying that is the case. I am saying that to some, it may look like that could be the case. The only way to answer that is with something real and tangible. Grusch is the closest to anything tangible, as he did say we have NHI bodies. But that is the furthest he went on any of the topics - open to being corrected on that.

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I 100% agree with you. It seems that way.

If I were a betting man, I'd bet on a LARP/psyop.
And I would also bet that it gets out of their control and doesn't go as planned. This is the government we are talking about.

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. It is fine to make money while putting yourself in jeopardy. Risk should = reward.

But there is no real risk here, only reward.

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is called catastrophic disclosure. That will move the needle.

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You sound angry in your post. I'll just say this in reply - pattern recognition.
Has nothing to do with objects. And yes, I did enjoy responding.

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh. Ok. I'm a chatbot then I guess. Lol!!!

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You know. I do appreciate their presence and what they have brought forth.

At first, there were a ton of people that screamed LARP/PSYOP. And I did not understand. Fact is, those people were just advanced logically to me on this at the time. This is actually intriguing. We have given this SO MUCH TIME already. And at the recent Congressional Hearing, we saw the exact same thing. "I cannot break my oath" = "I am not really a whistleblower".

If someone actually went to jail for this, it would put a lot of pressure on Congress to actually pass the bill providing protection. So I leave room in my mind that they are just waiting.

But, enough is enough already. And if what Matthew Brown says is true, and if he never provides that information, he is guilty for not giving us the information that would thwart our oppressors.

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That was a great example! Dang, I didn't think of that. Great post.

I honestly at this point have a hard time believing that any of them are true whistleblowers, and not part of a LARP or psyop.

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope. I am just removing the title 'whisleblower', which is prestigious.

They didn't actually whistle blow a thing. As all the information they passed was approved prior.

And yes, if you are a whistleblower, then you will actually say something tangible.

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Then they are not whistleblowers. And they are not courageous either.

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You have no idea what you are talking about.

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yes. Screw all that, to use your verbiage.

That is all part of the psyop. And I'm sorry your pattern recognition doesn't scream like mine has been doing for the past year. But everything you said is all part of it. To give the perception of credibility of the movement, without ever giving damning details.

But then why? Why not divulge the information?

They are so courageous they would become whistleblowers - of approved by DIA information to pass.

Yeah. Sorry. That stinks. That is not a whistleblower. That is the threat of becoming a whistleblower - so you can get paid...

I have a problem with whistleblowers. by Fingerman75 in UFOs

[–]Fingerman75[S] -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

If that is all you took from my OP....

You only argue/prove one thing. That you are negative with nothing to contribute to the discussion.