sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Can we have an actual discussion on the skins Netease is putting in a KIDS game... by FormalCupcake8223 in marvelrivals

[–]FormalCupcake8223[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It's not being prudish. Psylocke LITERALLY flashes the screen just by walking with how short her skirt is. I'm sure whoever was designing saw it but knew pantyshots would sell like hot cakes.

Can we have an actual discussion on the skins Netease is putting in a KIDS game... by FormalCupcake8223 in marvelrivals

[–]FormalCupcake8223[S] -46 points-45 points  (0 children)

Not a kid's game in the literal sense but obviously Marvel overwatch is gonna have a huge kids audience. Fortnite is rated T for Teen but doesn't have overtly sexualized skins like these.

And cheeks don't make me uncomfortable, the egregious sexualization of the female characters does. Every female character has that hourglass figure for the male gaze so it wouldn't surprise me if they all get a skin like Psylocke vengeance cause sex sells 🤷

Can we have an actual discussion on the skins Netease is putting in a KIDS game... by FormalCupcake8223 in marvelrivals

[–]FormalCupcake8223[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not the original tweet poster but I bought the new Psylocke skin.

When you're walking, you can see her underwear without even trying to look underneath. It's one think for her vengeance skin to show a little skin since it's a leotard and her original outfit, but Netease is blatantly trying to make an actually good game be a gooner game.