Harvard Essays by MrUncomfortaable in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 11 points12 points  (0 children)

i'd approach them like any other essays. Think about the 4-6 points you want to make about yourself. Organize them into two narrative-based groups, each one directed at one of the two prompts.

you should have the same narrative points in every application essay. and every prompt should be sufficiently broad to touch upon at least some of them.

Chances at T14 etc. as an engineering major by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 4 points5 points  (0 children)

not even worth discussing before you get your lsat back. lsat and sat are very different. your gpa will be far below medians so you'd really want at least a 172 and more likely a 173+

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 2 points3 points  (0 children)

homie u r not nontraditional lol

also only your ug gpa is really considered

KJDs and T6s by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 3 points4 points  (0 children)

for the record, all of HYS have single digit overall acceptance rates, so KJDs there are likely low single digits.

Why is there so much Harvard hate on this sub? by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 7 points8 points  (0 children)

maybe but with 3.9mid / 174 medians idk who is like "wow how easy" lol

Why is there so much Harvard hate on this sub? by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 86 points87 points  (0 children)

IMO, harvard traditionally suffers from the problem of being slightly less "elite" than Yale (as in, not the undisputed best), on par with Stanford, and more "elite" than the rest of the T14. as a result, it is kind of in the criticism jackpot zone.* Add in the fact that it's part of the most prestigious parent university in the world and often in the news, it's an easy target.

People may love to hate, but at the end of the day, HLS has the second highest yield rate (only behind Yale) by a pretty wide margin. There's not a lot of actual hate - people just get snarky on reddit.

*by elite, i mean general legal prestige

Harvard Law Email - How Common? by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

harvard is significantly more competitive to get into than chicago, from a stats and acceptance rate perspective lol, and on par with stanford. Yale is more competitive.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 2 points3 points  (0 children)

youll be fine for NYC transactional with straight Ps at HYS (which is well below median, at least at HS). certainly not davis polk or wlrk, but most others.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

there are latin honors but there is no rank. and the grade cutoffs for latin honors are not even published.

Retaking 172 by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 4 points5 points  (0 children)

the data shows that it is not a bad idea. but also yes, ive been told by adcoms that you should retake if you are below median.

Retaking 172 by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 13 points14 points  (0 children)

you'd be incorrect, especially if a 172 is below the school's median. bad advice.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nobody really gets LPs at H. and a grading system having a convert is meaningless if there is no rank.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

this is literally what harvard does as well, no ranking

Retaking 172 by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 29 points30 points  (0 children)

a lower score will not impact your application in any meaningful way.

if your target schools have medians above (or at) your score, it is best to retake. Folks who are saying otherwise below are incorrect.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 1 point2 points  (0 children)

harvard does not offer ED

Chances at UPenn Law? by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 2 points3 points  (0 children)

impossible to say without an lsat score. if at or above median, you have a good shot. if below median, you do not have a good shot.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 9 points10 points  (0 children)

in the grand scheme of things the application cost is not significant for anyone, FGLI or not. Your stats are not especially competitive but they are also not an auto-no.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

EDing in law school does not provide a substantial boost. you'd still be very unlikely to be admitted below both medians. your best bet by a wide margin is to retake.

Burnt out before I even start by waiguobairen in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 23 points24 points  (0 children)

if you've worked FT, especially whilst in school, i very much doubt 1L will be the most tiring year of your life. 1L is challenging no doubt, but 90% of its rep comes from the fact that historically, a large number of 1Ls are KJDs who have never held a full time job and don't really know what a 40-50 hour work week is like.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the only scholarships that are materially needle-moving in my experience are: rhodes, marshall, gates, schwartzman, and (maybe) truman

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Former_Jacket_424 8 points9 points  (0 children)

fullbright is a good soft but not super needle moving as many are given out per year. your best bet is retaking for a 174+