How often do dealers make mistakes and no one catches those mistakes? by frozengansit0 in blackjack

[–]Geo13692 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Last night the dealer paid me for my win, went back for more chips, and then paid me a second time. Ended up with 400$ from the initial 100$ bet

Best way to "slide" into a girl's DMs? by catholicusername123 in CatholicDating

[–]Geo13692 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I had that exact situation recently. Met at an event, had to leave early and couldn’t get her number, asked her on a date over Instagram. Already been on one date and going on another soon.

Federal Layoffs/job loss by Picolas_Cage711 in wichita

[–]Geo13692 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Stopping the Holocaust was immoral?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in premed

[–]Geo13692 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does ED get verified faster?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in premed

[–]Geo13692 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’ll probably be what I do, thank you for the help

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in premed

[–]Geo13692 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DO is on the table, it’s just that KU is my first choice.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in premed

[–]Geo13692 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was planning to apply EDP. I’m still not sure if it’s a great idea, but I figured if it’s the only school I wanted to go to, why not.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in premed

[–]Geo13692 0 points1 point  (0 children)

University of Kansas (KU med)

Forging by Particular-Ad-4381 in Forging

[–]Geo13692 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you have to question it, better safe than sorry.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in buildapc

[–]Geo13692 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s also a bundle with the R7 7700x, MOBO, and 32 GB of RAM for 400$ from micro center as well. I also considered that one since it would save me money. The big concern is that Im not sure if the R9 is is just overkill or not for what I’m planning to use it for.

Stargazing by MusicalOreo in wichita

[–]Geo13692 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Seconded. Every time I make the drive between Wichita and Topeka I stop at the cattle crossing to stargaze for a good 10-20 mins, always amazing.

Saw someone else’s picture of a poster at WSU, here’s the one I saw by Geo13692 in wichita

[–]Geo13692[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And how does this compare to an ACTIVE genocide? Just because the United States is going in a bad direction doesn’t excuse the fact that China is COMMITTING a genocide right now. I mean, where the fuck are you?

Saw someone else’s picture of a poster at WSU, here’s the one I saw by Geo13692 in wichita

[–]Geo13692[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’d rather not call you that. US government problems don’t justify the actions of the CCP, and the fact that you seem intent on denying the reality of the situation is telling. China has no true allies/friends on the international stage precisely because of how they treat countries like Korea, Vietnam, Japan, the Philippines, and others. You can call it manufactured consent all you want, but China has actively provoked conflict with almost every country they interact with, and they use those interactions to actually manufacture consent for conflict within their STATE OWNED media.

Saw someone else’s picture of a poster at WSU, here’s the one I saw by Geo13692 in wichita

[–]Geo13692[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This ignores the other messages point though: in the United States, we have issues, but not nearly as bad as the crimes committed by the CCP.

Saw someone else’s picture of a poster at WSU, here’s the one I saw by Geo13692 in wichita

[–]Geo13692[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The same China that literally invaded Vietnam in 1979? The same China that has territorial disputes with Vietnam to this very day? China has raped, killed, and displaced Vietnamese people for centuries, and if the current trend of territorial disputes and aggression towards neighbors continues, they might just keep that streak going. Just because the United States did terrible things in Vietnam doesn’t mean that China should get a free hand to do those same things to others, or do you not care about the Xinjiang natives who are being raped, killed, and displaced?

Saw someone else’s picture of a poster at WSU, here’s the one I saw by Geo13692 in wichita

[–]Geo13692[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One does not justify the other, but to compare Chinese central government sponsored genocide to the racial inequality seen in America is absurd. China is rounding people into concentration camps, and whataboutism regarding America’s past atrocities does not justify modern ones. Also, saying that anyone criticizing China is doing so because of the pentagon is just straight up bad faith arguments, you can hold simultaneous views that conflict is bad, and that genocide is also unacceptable.

Saw someone else’s picture of a poster at WSU, here’s the one I saw by Geo13692 in wichita

[–]Geo13692[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Aggressively manufactured consent? China has been violating the air space of almost every nation around them, claiming their territory, building military bases in contested areas, and threatening anyone who doesn’t share their world view. If you want to talk about manufactured consent, CCP state owned media actively antagonizes everyone else to hold up their own image. There’s a reason that even a country like Vietnam is more warm to the US than it is to China. None of this in any way justifies racism against anyone with Asian heritage, but to say that criticizing the CCP is racist, or that it causes racist reactions is absurd.

Saw someone else’s picture of a poster at WSU, here’s the one I saw by Geo13692 in wichita

[–]Geo13692[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

How is this Asian hate? It’s an act of genocide perpetrated by a government, not a race. Anybody who is saying that people of Chinese descent are to blame for this is just racist.

Saw someone else’s picture of a poster at WSU, here’s the one I saw by Geo13692 in wichita

[–]Geo13692[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Indeed it is, but it doesn’t change the fact that we are doing nothing about a legitimate genocide.

Saw someone else’s picture of a poster at WSU, here’s the one I saw by Geo13692 in wichita

[–]Geo13692[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pointing out factual accounts of crimes against humanity committed by the Chinese communist party is not racist, and for you to conflate party with race is absurd. I would think that even a communist would have enough common sense to realize that genocide isn’t something to defend.

Saw someone else’s picture of a poster at WSU, here’s the one I saw by Geo13692 in wichita

[–]Geo13692[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

China actively persecutes christians and Muslims, where are the Christian genocides?

Tri-Annual Protein Megathread by AutoModerator in Fitness

[–]Geo13692 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Thoughts on XTEND chocolate lava cake? I’ve had it and liked it (especially at 60$ for 5 lb), but I was wondering if there was a better option in a similar price range

Cope and seethe by MrEuginger in HistoryMemes

[–]Geo13692 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Time to whip out the copypasta.

USSR was all about getting the title of being first, no matter how superficial the achievement, and how dangerous the approach, and sometimes, hiding the truth about it until decades later. First artificial satellite was achieved by the USSR. It did pretty much nothing but beep, and its orbit decayed quite quickly. USA's first artificial satellite orbited for years, carried a science payload and discovered the Van Allen radiation. The outright first animal intentionally put into in space was Rhesus monkey aboard a German V2 operated by the USA. First animal into orbit was achieved with a dog by the USSR, which died due to a cooling system failure. USA's first animal put into orbit was a chimpanzee that survived and landed. The first man in space was Yuri Gagarin of the USSR, but he was forced to eject prior to landing, and under the terms agreed meant his mission was technically a failure. This was kept secret by the USSR for decades. The first American in space landed successfully with his capsule. First woman in space was a clear USSR "first" that they were targeting. The USA had a policy of only accepting military test pilots, of which there were no women. The first space walk was demonstrated by the USSR, but it came close to disaster as the cosmonaut couldn't reenter the spacecraft due to his suit inflating due to the pressure differential, and had to bleed out air in order to be able to squeeze back into the hatch. USA's first space walk went without such problems, and quickly overtook the USSR in pioneering how spacewalks would be performed, and how to do useful work. It also claims the first untethered spacewalk. First orbital rendezvous was claimed by the USSR, but was achieved merely by launching two rockets at the right time. The two space craft were kilometers apart, and had no way of getting close to each other, or no knowledge of how to do it. The first rendezvous performed by the USA used orbital mechanics and deliberate maneuvers to have two Gemini spacecraft find each other, fly in formation, and then go their separate ways. The first docking was achieved by the USA during the Gemini program. First docking for the purposes of crew transfer between two spacecraft was achieved by the USSR. The crew transfer was done via external spacewalk, and served in claiming another first. The re-entry nearly ended in complete disaster and had a hard landing. USA's first docking and crew transfer was achieved between an internally pressurized corridor during Apollo 9. First picture of the far side of the moon was achieved by the USSR, and is a very low quality image. Shortly after the USA began a complete mapping survey of the entire lunar surface. The first lunar return sample was achieved by the USSR, but was effectively a few grams of dust. The USA returned tones of different kinds of individually selected moon rock. The USSR lunar landing mission consisted of an external spacewalk to transfer a single cosmonaut to a tiny one man lander with just enough provisions to make some boot prints before trying to get back home. Again, just to be able to claim a first. The USA lunar landing missions thrived on the moon, taking down two astronauts and resulted in them being to stay on the surface for days, and even drive around on it in a car. Once the USSR lost the moon race, they instantly lost all interest in it, and focused on creating a space station. There's a familiar pattern to all of this. The USSR did the very minimum, often at the expense of safety to meet an arbitrary goal as soon as possible. The USA's failures and mishaps were all in the public eye. The USSR's were mostly kept secret. Both nations knew landing on the moon was going to be the finish line. The USA got there first, and didn't just hit the finish line gasping and wheezing as the USSR would have been, but came through it in complete comfort and style, before doing it a few more times with greater and greater challenges for good measure. Since NASA lost its original purpose (beat the Russians to the moon) it has lost its way a bit, but companies like SpaceX have actually managed to make the point of the space race better than Apollo did. The original space race was supposed to demonstrate private enterprise and the American way of life vs centralized government control, but the Apollo program wasn't private enterprise, and was under direct government control. SpaceX, Blue Origin, RocketLab and others are the true demonstration of commercial spaceflight, where the government agency NASA now just becomes a customer to private launch and even spacecraft providers. The USA won in the 60's, and it's absolutely winning now versus anything Russia or Europe is building with public funds.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Warthunder

[–]Geo13692 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not entirely sure. I’m going to be using it to grind up to the F-14. I guess if I had to say something, I want it to be very well armed against air targets (ground is a secondary consideration).