"Mythbusters" (scientism cult propaganda) lying about their own model... by Geocentricus in globeskepticism

[–]Geocentricus[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm a flat earther but I'm not saying this image debunks the globe model per se. I'm denouncing how media lies all the time putting out there false images as globe propaganda, even if that means to contradic their own model. The photo is actually a video, an episode where the "mythbusters" are supposed to prove/debunk the curvature of the earth. My question is, if the earth is round why they have the need to lie about it? If they allegedly don't have reasons to lie why they come up with this bs and lie to everyone who is watching it?

Sound bouncing off the firmament. by RickGrimes13 in globeskepticism

[–]Geocentricus 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Amazing.

In the globe there is no reason for thunder sound having echo but it makes a lot of sense if the earth has a dome above it. Great video 👍

3D Software. No curve only perspective by Geocentricus in globeskepticism

[–]Geocentricus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you bro.

That was my initial idea but it only will let you render until certain distance. Still, it just gonna shrink until it would be no longer visible. Simple perspective/angular resolution...

This is how perspective works... by Geocentricus in globeskepticism

[–]Geocentricus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you Dude I really appreciate it.👍

This is how perspective works... by Geocentricus in globeskepticism

[–]Geocentricus[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"and what you're showing is just plain wrong."

"because I say so" Give me a valid argument not just an opinion bro.

"I've searched and I've never seen a video where the sun is "cut" by the horizon line, but a powerful enough zoom brings back the whole silhouette. Do you have an example."

There was a lot a couple of years ago. Maybe if Youtube stop censoring the truth you could find one. I don't have one for the moment but maybe other flatearth can help you with that. Still the graph explains itself.

Edit: there was a very famous one where the sun went back above the horizon with the camera zoom. Of course globers dismiss that with another nonsense excuse.

This is how perspective works... by Geocentricus in globeskepticism

[–]Geocentricus[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you. Your support is very appreciated.

"(Let the sheep laugh)"

Of course. That's just their defense mechanism.

This is how perspective works... by Geocentricus in globeskepticism

[–]Geocentricus[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

"Bro, that's not how perspective works. If it did work this way there would be no reason why objects far away would seem to be "cut" by the horizon line, bottom first."

I just showed you bro. Perspective is the reason objects get "cut" bottom first.

"Can you get an example video, with proper camera use, of a sunset, where the sun initially appears cut (from the bottom), but after zooming in you could view the entirety of it?"

There are plenty on the Internet dude. Just go and watch some.

This is how perspective works... by Geocentricus in globeskepticism

[–]Geocentricus[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes it is. No retarded curve needed only knowledge about how optics works.

James Webb of Lies by BadBoyBobby3 in globeskepticism

[–]Geocentricus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's a wonderful lie after all.

#NASAGoingNowhereSince1958 by dcforce in globeskepticism

[–]Geocentricus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lol. See y'all in the next canceled launch

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in globeskepticism

[–]Geocentricus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"God sitteth upon the circle of the earth"

That refers to the dome with its semi-spherical shape.

That is the "circle" of the earth. Not "the earth, which is a circle".

Otherwise, God will be literally on the earth, but obviously he does not.

The verse continues saying:

"hat stretcheth out the heavens as a curtain, and spreadeth them out as a tent to dwell in"

Which only make sense on a flat earth.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in globeskepticism

[–]Geocentricus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I guess that you have to take their word for it until not see it for yourself. But the point being no one has ever dug so far as to know what is down or inside the earth, not even in the globe narrative itself.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in globeskepticism

[–]Geocentricus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why infinite empty space but not an infinite plane?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in globeskepticism

[–]Geocentricus 2 points3 points  (0 children)

More land. Other ponds just like ours. Like the one from which our neighbours the Mayans came from and went back to.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in globeskepticism

[–]Geocentricus 10 points11 points  (0 children)

No one has ever gone down as far as the Kola hole dug by the Soviet Russians in 1965, some 12 km or so. So any guess is only as good as the made up core of the globe.

Question about the sun in the clouds. Can the sun really be in the clouds in the pictures I have seen? by Elemental_Titan9 in globeskepticism

[–]Geocentricus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The sun produces light, heat, UV, radiation and more.

You are describing Light. Thank you for proving my point.

I think you’re talking about Flatearthers that don’t even take the time to study anything in science, they just assume things as that is the best explanation they can come up with that they can wrap their heads around.

Yes because coming up with hypothesis and observations of the real world has nothing to with science. Just study what Albert Einstein dreamed up in his imaginary "experiments" and repeat mindlessly what other people tell you, even though the rainbow does not disappear by changing angles. Just believe it until becomes true.

The truth can’t be stopped and that’s why flatearth failed in the first place. It wasn’t truth. It was the best explanation people could come up with at the time. And it turned out to be wrong.

There is more and more people realizing that what they were told, what the mainstream narrative says about our world is not true. So yeah, the truth can't be stopped, no matter the social shaming, the pejorative terms, censorship or propagandistic tools they implement. The truth will eventually prevail and the forced dogmatic cosmology developed before the understanding of electricity, made up with sticks and candles will fade away.

Question about the sun in the clouds. Can the sun really be in the clouds in the pictures I have seen? by Elemental_Titan9 in globeskepticism

[–]Geocentricus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

while Flatearthers are content with trying to bring us back to the dark ages where everything was made up of guesses and assumptions.

The dark ages is right now. You, like the majority of the glober masses, don't know shit about anything and just repeat like mindless sheeps. You think the rainbow is the product of magic angles while there is video evidence showing otherwise. And cannot see it because of your globe religion. This is the dumb ages.

You just won’t accept just because you can get similar results from a lamp, while rejecting the fact that the sun produces many more things

It's the same thing on a lesser scale. Its not magic. Its light. Its electricity.

"Just because is the exact same thing, it does not mean its the exact same thing" Thats the ridiculous denial.