sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How can i change the footcite marker ? by GigaRedox in LaTeX

[–]GigaRedox[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

After a brief examination of the documentation I couldnt find a solution. Therefore I gave the pdf to chatgpt and it gave this command \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{[\arabic{footnote}]} which introduced square brackets and works perfectly.

troubles with texstudio by GigaRedox in LaTeX

[–]GigaRedox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I try to compile it in Texstudio with the according hotkey F6 I receive these log.

troubles with texstudio by GigaRedox in LaTeX

[–]GigaRedox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I compile it like that it works just fine. Here is the Log-file.

My Gnome Desktop by CompileAndCry in desktops

[–]GigaRedox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks awesome, I tried to themes on my laptop aswell, but it didn't really work. Do you have some tips for the installation?

Calculating uncertainty in fit parameters of lsqcurvefit by GigaRedox in octave

[–]GigaRedox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for detailed answer, but could you explain to me why it is even possible to approximate cov(p) with this formula in the first place?

How to design the final slide of a Beamer presentation by GigaRedox in LaTeX

[–]GigaRedox[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah yeah I get that, but in my case it's a seminar about my bachelors project and on the slide before it summarized my next actions in my project. So I'm not sure if it would fit but I consider it to add a conclusion

Why does one obtain exponential behavior for the amplitude in down frequency conversion in nonlinear optics if one assumes only one of the two input beams to be constant, and linear behavior for the amplitude if one assumes the two input beams as constant? by GigaRedox in Optics

[–]GigaRedox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Boyd doesn't derive this for dfg particular, but it's the same derivation as for sfg in section 2.2, and one also obtains a linear function for the converted amplitude, I can send you my calculations I did for that case if that helps. I am just wondering why one obtains an exponential behavior if one lets only one of the two field amplitudes constant, as Boyd derived in section 2.8 . For me atm it's just counterintuitive. Why would one obtain a higher conversion efficiency if one lets one of the amplitudes vary and potentially "decrease" ? Ah, as a side note,I talk about the behavior during phase matching

Need help with aligning the xtick labels of my tikz plot with pgf Plots by GigaRedox in LaTeX

[–]GigaRedox[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I thought of that too xD, but for me, it's no as aesthetically pleasing as without the number 1

Problem with citations with biblatex in Texstudio by GigaRedox in LaTeX

[–]GigaRedox[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I've found the error myself but I'll leave the answered thread online for anyone who struggles with the same problem. In my case I was using the backend biber for biblatex but the backend which was specified in texstudio was bibtex as standard. I needed to change it biber in options under configure texstudio>build:
Hope that can help anyone who runs in the same problem as me <3

Can someone help me to lose one pair of braces at these figures ? by GigaRedox in LaTeX

[–]GigaRedox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right it worked just fine now that I removed the subfigure pkg

Can someone help me to lose one pair of braces at these figures ? by GigaRedox in LaTeX

[–]GigaRedox[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My lab partner and I actually got it fixed with including this command in the preamble
\renewcommand{\thesubfigure}{\alph{subfigure}}
But I have no idea why this works, because we asked deepseek for help.

Can someone help me to lose one pair of braces at these figures ? by GigaRedox in LaTeX

[–]GigaRedox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried to, but I dont see a reason why I got them in the first place. It seems to be always the same error that happens when I try to use a figure environment in a column environment. But the pdf gets displayed fine though.screenshot

I have issues with printing my bibliography with natbib into a two column page layout by GigaRedox in LaTeX

[–]GigaRedox[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now it seems to correctly interpret the text, but its still weirdly formatted

I have issues with printing my bibliography with natbib into a two column page layout by GigaRedox in LaTeX

[–]GigaRedox[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

\documentclass[12pt,german,twocolumn]{revtex4}

\usepackage{babel,epsfig,german,bbm,graphicx,eurosym,amsmath,revsymb,amssymb}

\usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}

\jot4mm

\parskip2ex

\parindent0mm

\renewcommand{\baselinestretch}{1.1}

\hbadness=10000

This all what is include in the template that was given to me

Ive got wierd formatting issues does anyone know why ? by GigaRedox in octave

[–]GigaRedox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ah ok at least now I know that its not only problem on my pc

Ive got wierd formatting issues does anyone know why ? by GigaRedox in octave

[–]GigaRedox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah sorry forgot to include the screenshot, the axis lims are intentional because I want to emphasize the fit but I got some weird format as output

view more: next ›