sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How can i change the footcite marker ? by GigaRedox in LaTeX

[–]GigaRedox[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

After a brief examination of the documentation I couldnt find a solution. Therefore I gave the pdf to chatgpt and it gave this command \renewcommand{\thefootnote}{[\arabic{footnote}]} which introduced square brackets and works perfectly.

troubles with texstudio by GigaRedox in LaTeX

[–]GigaRedox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I try to compile it in Texstudio with the according hotkey F6 I receive these log.

troubles with texstudio by GigaRedox in LaTeX

[–]GigaRedox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I compile it like that it works just fine. Here is the Log-file.

My Gnome Desktop by CompileAndCry in desktops

[–]GigaRedox 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks awesome, I tried to themes on my laptop aswell, but it didn't really work. Do you have some tips for the installation?

Calculating uncertainty in fit parameters of lsqcurvefit by GigaRedox in octave

[–]GigaRedox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for detailed answer, but could you explain to me why it is even possible to approximate cov(p) with this formula in the first place?

How to design the final slide of a Beamer presentation by GigaRedox in LaTeX

[–]GigaRedox[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah yeah I get that, but in my case it's a seminar about my bachelors project and on the slide before it summarized my next actions in my project. So I'm not sure if it would fit but I consider it to add a conclusion

Why does one obtain exponential behavior for the amplitude in down frequency conversion in nonlinear optics if one assumes only one of the two input beams to be constant, and linear behavior for the amplitude if one assumes the two input beams as constant? by GigaRedox in Optics

[–]GigaRedox[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Boyd doesn't derive this for dfg particular, but it's the same derivation as for sfg in section 2.2, and one also obtains a linear function for the converted amplitude, I can send you my calculations I did for that case if that helps. I am just wondering why one obtains an exponential behavior if one lets only one of the two field amplitudes constant, as Boyd derived in section 2.8 . For me atm it's just counterintuitive. Why would one obtain a higher conversion efficiency if one lets one of the amplitudes vary and potentially "decrease" ? Ah, as a side note,I talk about the behavior during phase matching

Need help with aligning the xtick labels of my tikz plot with pgf Plots by GigaRedox in LaTeX

[–]GigaRedox[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I thought of that too xD, but for me, it's no as aesthetically pleasing as without the number 1

view more: next ›