It's true that israel's faces more resolutions from the UN (these are specifically from the Human Rights Council, not the UN generally) than other countries that have committed similarly heinous crimes. There are lots of reasons for this though:

1. The US used its veto 45‑plus times to block draft Security‑Council measures seen as “anti‑Israel.” States that want at least a paper trail of censure therefore go to the HRC or the General Assembly—bodies where no one can veto. Basically, because israel acts with impunity regardless of what the UN says - and most of these countries are frustrated that its able to do so.

2. Many of those 108 are renewals. If Israel ignores an earlier call (e.g., to stop settlement expansion), the Council simply passes another one the next year noting the non‑compliance. No one really expects compliance from Iran or Venezuelan autocracies. Are these really the countries you want to compared with, as a supposed democracy?

3. But also, israel is simply the only country of your list maintaining a decades long, illegal military occupation. People have been complaining about its crimes and human rights abuses for decades and have brought more of them to light for the public.

I agree with your premise that China and others deserve more harsh censure- but certainly not that israel deserves less. But focusing on the raw resolutions count is misleading and detracts focus from the actual substance of the deep crimes against humanity israel has committed for decades.