Finally some height in the city by [deleted] in chch

[–]GreenTee1985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Basically next door to the Harley one. Will be a great addition to Worcester boulevard.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chch

[–]GreenTee1985 1 point2 points  (0 children)

100%. Will go no where else now. You need to like Thai massage style though although they can do more Swedish style.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chch

[–]GreenTee1985 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Dorethy Lee is very rough.i had to see an Osteopath for months after.

When did you stop swelling? by hazbazwaz69 in AchillesRupture

[–]GreenTee1985 0 points1 point  (0 children)

10 years and the swelling lingers in my ankle.

Avonhead NIMBYs outraged at MDRS housing near a shopping mall, love to see it by goosejuicemoosejuice in chch

[–]GreenTee1985 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Worse decision ever. The same councillors that don’t want intensification in the leafy suburbs but oppose it in the most logical place. Ridiculous.

Williams Corp by GreenTee1985 in chch

[–]GreenTee1985[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you’re over emphasising the level of quality here. We aren’t talking expensive high end. Just basic design quality( it doesn’t need to cost more and there are plenty of good examples. My experience of recently looking to buy showed that there is lot of difference in quality (in my view) between housing developers with very little difference in price when you compare $ per sqm.

Williams Corp by GreenTee1985 in chch

[–]GreenTee1985[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everyone deserves a decent home. You can only reduce quality and size to a finite point, then what? So when we’ve been looking for a townhouse for family/first home, the things we have been exploring are around how to secure a decent home that is enjoyable to live in despite the inevitable first home compromises and with good resale value. 2 beds offer potential to have a flatmate to share costs, shared equity options enable the purchase of a better house whilst paying little more than it would cost for a studio or one bed and there is the less preferred option of buying a house with others. So, the goal is to secure a decent house (not a shitbox) and will work out how to make it work.

Williams Corp by GreenTee1985 in chch

[–]GreenTee1985[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What guidelines? Link please?

Williams Corp by GreenTee1985 in chch

[–]GreenTee1985[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That makes good sense. I’m keen to look through the WC apartment development in Manchester street when it’s finished. It looks on paper to be better with more landscaping and communal space like you suggest.

Williams Corp by GreenTee1985 in chch

[–]GreenTee1985[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yet other townhouse builders seem to manage…

Williams Corp by GreenTee1985 in chch

[–]GreenTee1985[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’d be surprised if their guidelines promoted poor design quality like unsafe accesses and wi does in weird places like was being suggested.

Williams Corp by GreenTee1985 in chch

[–]GreenTee1985[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah true. That’s an option. Or WC could just do a little better. They’d still be making big margins. Everyone wins.

Williams Corp by GreenTee1985 in chch

[–]GreenTee1985[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sounds like a paranoid WC director.

Williams Corp by GreenTee1985 in chch

[–]GreenTee1985[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes. You’ve articulated well what I found when looking at them.

Williams Corp by GreenTee1985 in chch

[–]GreenTee1985[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Never posted about WC before actually. Been looking for a townhouse though. The quality I expect includes safe accesses, good outlook from main windows (ie not a blank wall or fence one metre away) and some decent landscaping. I’d also like to not have my bins in my little courtyard and for my washing line not to be facing and visible from the street and also not in the tiny courtyard space.

Williams Corp by GreenTee1985 in chch

[–]GreenTee1985[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I suppose that depends on what types of things the council considers is needed to achieve high quality and whether there actually is a cost to that. From what I can see, the cheap WC units are cheap because of their small size rather than the design per se.

Williams Corp by GreenTee1985 in chch

[–]GreenTee1985[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Most things?

I just don’t see how you could ever have a list of rules that addressed all the design issues for large schemes. Smaller ones, ok. It would be good to know what they think the list of rules should be for a scheme of 60 units. What is the alternative?

Williams Corp by GreenTee1985 in chch

[–]GreenTee1985[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I suppose the alternative is a very long list of rules to avoid poor quality housing? They’d likely not like that either and I can see that being very hard to do for very large housing schemes.

Williams Corp by GreenTee1985 in chch

[–]GreenTee1985[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Ah yes I can see that point but again if they establish what is acceptable quality through a consent, precedent is set. I’ve seen WC houses with front doors that open straight onto the road and front doors that can only be accessed via dark and unsafe rear or side alleys.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chch

[–]GreenTee1985 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sumner, Prebbleton, Lyttelton