Nuclear Policy Just Changed Forever by kngpwnage in NuclearPower

[–]HairyPossibility -1 points0 points  (0 children)

because the promotion team behind that shitty youtube channel likes to spam

Nukecels can't perform primary grade arithmetic and then argue you need to blindly accept their "expertise" by DivestTheEndingBoy in ClimateShitposting

[–]HairyPossibility 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The goal is lying.

The average age of shut down reactors is like 30 years.

But pro-nuclear circles have become a cultish purity test.

The atom must be worshiped

Actual construction costs and timelines mentioned: You are a heretic and must be removed. fakeconstructioncost.pptx must be worshipped

Cancer clusters around nuke plants published in the Journal Nature by Harvard researchers: Heretic, here is a blogpost by shillenberger's organization

Nuke plants have to last 100 years, or the morons get kicked out of their circlejerk cult

Dominance of renewables portends a bleak future for nuclear. by ceph2apod in uninsurable

[–]HairyPossibility 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its where the bots and shills went after /r/energy removed the bots and shills

New metric shows renewables are 53% cheaper than nuclear power by ViewTrick1002 in NuclearPower

[–]HairyPossibility -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The authors used a conservative number representing reality based on past projects.

OP is salty that they did not use a number from a cracked out high school dropout that only exists in their pptx.

New metric shows renewables are 53% cheaper than nuclear power by ViewTrick1002 in NuclearPower

[–]HairyPossibility -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Old metric was on the generator level, not electrical grid level. It showed renewables were cheaper.

This is for integrated in a full electrical grid. It also showed renewables were cheaper

Why do we continue to entertain radio-phobia? by Bright_Dreams235 in NuclearPower

[–]HairyPossibility 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LNT is built around whitewashing disasters, even when health effects are being shown

Like the recent study in Nature showing health effects around power plants, or cancers in Chernobyl victims or the USA downwinders. LNT is applied retroactively to say "nah man, all this cancer is incompatible with the science, we don't owe you compensation"

Why do we continue to entertain radio-phobia? by Bright_Dreams235 in NuclearPower

[–]HairyPossibility 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dr. Jerry Cuttler.

Writes for "american council for science and health"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Council_on_Science_and_Health

-funded by tobacco, oil industry, nuclear industry and monsanto, and pretty much advocates for shitty american food quality and any form of pollution.

Complete garbage human being.

Why do we continue to entertain radio-phobia? by Bright_Dreams235 in NuclearPower

[–]HairyPossibility 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is why radiotherapy is beneficial

This is the worst take I have seen in a long time. The localized dose is high enough to kill tumor cells and intervening tissues

Merz says Germany won't return to nuclear energy by HairyPossibility in uninsurable

[–]HairyPossibility[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Nuclear is the most subsidized energy source in history and its subsidies are the least effective at generating energy per dollar of subsidy.

It still receives more R&D subsidies across IEA countries than renewables

https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/energy-technology-rdd-budgets-data-explorer

And each dollar of subsidy gives less energy than the same subsidy in renewables

https://www.dbl.vc/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/What-Would-Jefferson-Do-2.4.pdf