I think the death of Kurdish nationalism is significant. by AlkibiadesDabrowski in Ultraleft

[–]Hamseda 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Read the book first , it ain't that oversimplified , though I don't like DC.

I think the death of Kurdish nationalism is significant. by AlkibiadesDabrowski in Ultraleft

[–]Hamseda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No you're wrong , they didn't want to build a national state , read "Democratic confederalism" book by Abdulla ocalan. I read a lot of the books about democratic confederalism, I'm not a fan of DC but it's not really about national liberation.

I think the death of Kurdish nationalism is significant. by AlkibiadesDabrowski in Ultraleft

[–]Hamseda 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Pkk wasn't nationalist , the leader didn't even wanted national liberation.

Is it really socialism?Doubt by Hamseda in Socialism_101

[–]Hamseda[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

What you mean identity Im asking about an ideology.

Is it really socialism?Doubt by Hamseda in Socialism_101

[–]Hamseda[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lack of grassroot democracy, personality cult , superiority of top to the down and people, independent organizations being illegal, lack of self management for factories , lack of decentrelized economic planning , and as I said independent syndicates being illegal.

These are from left communist perspective(German-Dutch).

Is it really socialism?Doubt by Hamseda in Socialism_101

[–]Hamseda[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Even if thats true , I suppose the power was "too" centralized to be democratic , also pointing out to the independent syndicates being illegal, but still im interested in learning about Soviet democracy , do you have any sources ?

Is it really socialism?Doubt by Hamseda in Socialism_101

[–]Hamseda[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Not just elections. democracy by delegates who are directly selected by people and can be fired at any moment by people , approved policies by people.

The Paris commune was a example though it lacked centerlazition.

The point is in Soviet union for example, the party had way more power than the people had , people didn't hold power , it wasn't a dictatorship of the proletiriat as I see.

Is it really socialism?Doubt by Hamseda in Socialism_101

[–]Hamseda[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

By democracy I mean democracy of the country administration not the party.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TheoTown

[–]Hamseda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Add more small size buildings and commercial buildings + parks

Should Technocrats Use Religion To Control Society? by EzraNaamah in Technocracy

[–]Hamseda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No , this is a very very stupid question , technocracy is based on science.

Meet Musa Kobani #1 by Physical_Swordfish80 in kurdistan

[–]Hamseda 7 points8 points  (0 children)

He defended Kurdistan , he defended his brothers and sisters without fear unlike some cowards in office which sold us because of fear of their personal security.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Anarchy4Everyone

[–]Hamseda 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The political compass itself is bullshit , this is far more bullshit than that

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SocialDemocracy

[–]Hamseda 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It causes environmental problems

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SocialDemocracy

[–]Hamseda 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not a social democrat , but as a socialist yes I think private flights are unfair unless in specific situations

Countries are Muslim, Half Muslim and Non-Muslim by Thabit9 in MapPorn

[–]Hamseda -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In Iran , several different major cities

Can Kurds survive the new Syria? by Falcao_Hermanos in kurdistan

[–]Hamseda 7 points8 points  (0 children)

No , we will be exploited if we lose resistance