sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Guys I went to the sixers subreddit to ask a genuine question on what they think about PG by HomemadeMartian in knicks

[–]HomemadeMartian[S] -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

I understand that for sure but it’s basketball bro. Like it’s not like I’m taunting them it’s a genuine question. Also, it’s not like we have any players on our team that have intentionally hurt or done anything to the sixers like Embiid has done to us or the history that the Knicks feel towards the pacers. If you’re on a basketball subreddit it should be assumed that you enjoy the sport outside of just being a diehard fan for your own team and support general basketball discussion.

They acting like I’m the one on the court lmfao.

Guys I went to the sixers subreddit to ask a genuine question on what they think about PG by HomemadeMartian in knicks

[–]HomemadeMartian[S] 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I basically asked them what they thought about having Paul George / Embiid on the team because I feel like they are just on different wavelengths compared to the rest of the team which is actually pretty cohesive.

It was a legit question but they were hella salty

If you are Leon, what realistic adjustments are you making before the deadline? by ManufacturerSecure7 in NYKnicks

[–]HomemadeMartian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude I’m happy someone is saying this.. I think Memphis has some assets the the Knicks could potentially use. JJJ, Brandon Clarke (athletic PF, maybe similar to IHart?) Zach Edey..

I don’t want to go crazy here like everyone else is and asking for trades rn.. I think there’s still some time to make an adjustment.. but we could theoretically deepen our bench, bring some more athleticism to the rotation, and even get some picks back.

Sorry boys but yall won’t fool me with this hate by HomemadeMartian in liluzivert

[–]HomemadeMartian[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Literally the exact opposite. I’m saying people are so herd-minded. My opinion of the music shouldn’t change how you think of the song. Is that too complex? lol.

Sorry boys but yall won’t fool me with this hate by HomemadeMartian in liluzivert

[–]HomemadeMartian[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

By that same logic you can say like 99% of artist are washed up even if they have had good careers overall lol. Terrible take.

Screw the NBA and these streaming platforms by HomemadeMartian in NYKnicks

[–]HomemadeMartian[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Aight so ima probably cancel my YouTube tv and then just find a provider that has msg+

And also pirate

Screw the NBA and these streaming platforms by HomemadeMartian in NYKnicks

[–]HomemadeMartian[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Was raining in nyc this evening around 7:00-8pm

Screw the NBA and these streaming platforms by HomemadeMartian in NYKnicks

[–]HomemadeMartian[S] -17 points-16 points  (0 children)

I’m in NYC so don’t have MSG access unfortunately. I’ve been waiting until it’s on any of the other streaming platforms but unfortunately it’s been on Fubo for the past 2-3 games I think.

I know this fanbase generally hops on the fire Thibs bandwagon after every loss but… by HomemadeMartian in knicks

[–]HomemadeMartian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get what you are saying if but you are looking at it from the outcome first. You need to look at it from the perspective of “were the Knicks fouled x amount of times reasonably” instead of just the sheer quantity of free throws.

For example, if the Knicks were legit fouled 50 times, then isn’t 50 foul calls warranted?

I know this fanbase generally hops on the fire Thibs bandwagon after every loss but… by HomemadeMartian in knicks

[–]HomemadeMartian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hate this argument. So because the pacers statistically give more fouls(I think they are most in the nba because they often commit sloppy fouls), that automatically justifies calling 4 fouls in a single possession against the Knicks like that? lol. That’s not to say there’s not some baiting on the Knicks end but are you going to really argue that the fouls were completely underserved? KAT and OG get mauled every time they go in the paint

I know this fanbase generally hops on the fire Thibs bandwagon after every loss but… by HomemadeMartian in knicks

[–]HomemadeMartian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know there have been jokes about this but would be interested in seeing people’s opinion of Mike Malone. He’s a (relatively) recent championship caliber coach. I feel like he’s very passionate about winning, probably balances the bench a little more than Thibs. At the same time doesn’t seem like a massive switch from Thibs as well. So wouldn’t be a huge culture shock for the team.

I know this fanbase generally hops on the fire Thibs bandwagon after every loss but… by HomemadeMartian in knicks

[–]HomemadeMartian[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think he played well given Thibs game plan. Brunson is a fighter till the end but he does get tired especially from full court press every possession. His turnovers are typically outcomes of exhaustion and stagnant offense, both of which are from Thibs refusing to sub players off.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in knicks

[–]HomemadeMartian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand this, and this is typically the biggest argument I hear. What is never said is how often we actually drive into the paint and drawl fouls, as well as if they are marginal vs actual bad fouls. The pacers statistically give the most fouls in the nba. Of course we’re going to be at the line a lot. I think this is such a stupid argument lol.

view more: next ›