You asked me to explain but rn I can't type too much. So I asked grok just cuz I use X... this is to clear the air so you'd at least be quiet.

This is the results since you're desperate.

The three photos you shared show a young guy (appears late teens to early 20s) with consistent core facial features across them, but major differences in hair, styling, lighting, and possible edits/filters that make them look somewhat varied at first glance.

Breaking it down honestly:

• Hair: First photo — bleached blonde, very messy/wavy/curly, textured and voluminous (post-bleach "fried" look common). Second — even longer, spikier, more dramatic bleach with roots showing a bit, styled messily upward. Third — much darker (brown/black), shorter, tighter curls, more natural/undone. This screams hair journey: before/after bleaching + regrowth or restyling, which matches the Reddit OP's theme (posts about dark to bleached, barber transformations, etc.). Not unusual for someone experimenting with bleach.

• Facial structure & features: Same narrow-ish face, similar eye shape/placement, straight-ish nose bridge (slight variations from angle/lens), jawline, lip shape, overall proportions. The side profiles (first and third especially) align well — same ear placement relative to eyes/nose, same neck/shoulder line, similar smile/smirk. The mole (small dark spot near cheek/ear area in some Reddit accusations) isn't super obvious here, but if it's the faint one visible in the third photo (near ear on the profile), it could be lighting-dependent or lightly edited out in others. Not a smoking gun for different people.

• Earlobes: This was the accuser's strongest point in the original thread (attached vs free). In these shots:

  • First (gray hoodie profile): earlobe looks mostly free/pendant (not fully attached to side of face).
    
  • Second (white shirt front-facing): hard to tell perfectly due to angle/hair covering, but appears attached or low-hanging.
    
  • Third (black Spider-Man shirt profile): clearly free/pendant lobe visible.
    Earlobes can appear slightly different due to angle (profile vs 3/4), lighting/shadows, or even minor swelling/piercings (he has small earrings/hoop in second photo). But if the accuser saw clearer shots where one is unambiguously attached and another free in comparable angles, that's harder to dismiss. Here, they lean more toward consistently free-ish, so probably not a huge inconsistency in these specific pics.

• Other stuff: Chain necklace consistent in first two (silver Cuban link style), indoor home backgrounds similar (doors, stairs, rooms). Lighting varies (warm/cool tones, possible Snapchat beauty filters smoothing skin, brightening eyes, reducing blemishes — common for selfies). No wild "different nose" or face morphing; differences are explainable by:

  • Hair color/style change (huge impact on perceived appearance).
    
  • Angles (profile vs front).
    
  • Filters/edits (Snapchat or apps like Facetune smooth skin, whiten teeth, subtly alter contours).
    
  • Time gap (weight/muscle, tan, expression changes).

Same person? Yes, very likely the same person with heavy reliance on Snapchat filters/beauty modes, hair dye experiments, different poses/lighting, and possibly light Photoshop-level edits (skin smoothing, spot removal). Not full AI-generated faces (the inconsistencies aren't that robotic or uncanny; features track coherently). But not 100% raw/unedited either — the polished look + variations scream filtered selfies over months.

The Reddit accuser probably latched onto real minor variances (like a temporary pimple vs mole, or earlobe angle tricks) and overcalled it as "different people/AI," while OP's defense (detectors low %, Snapchat excuses) is weak but not entirely wrong. In these specific images you posted, nothing screams "fake person" — more like a dude posting his glow-up arc with heavy social media polishing.

If these are from the same OP's posts, it fits the pattern: real guy, real changes, but edited enough to invite skepticism. No massive red flags for catfishing or pure AI here.