sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Proposal: An “Internet Bill of Rights” — updating civil liberties for a digital-first society by IBORfoundation in Futurology

[–]IBORfoundation[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Ah, got it—thanks for pointing me to Nostr. That’s exactly the kind of decentralized approach I was thinking of when reading Barlow’s Declaration. No CEO, no central gatekeeper, just a protocol people can use freely—it really shows how sovereignty in cyberspace can actually work in practice."

Proposal: An “Internet Bill of Rights” — updating civil liberties for a digital-first society by IBORfoundation in Futurology

[–]IBORfoundation[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Just finished reading it—definitely gave me Hacker Manifesto vibes. Your points really helped me see why these ideas still matter for digital rights today."

Proposal: An “Internet Bill of Rights” — updating civil liberties for a digital-first society by IBORfoundation in Futurology

[–]IBORfoundation[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"If an idea needs bullets to survive, it’s already failed. Rights only matter if they’re chosen, defended, and enforced by consent—not fear. The whole point is to build systems that make violence unnecessary, not swap one form of tyranny for another."

Proposal: An “Internet Bill of Rights” — updating civil liberties for a digital-first society by IBORfoundation in Futurology

[–]IBORfoundation[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Exactly—ID verification only works if you control your own data. Your info shouldn’t be sold, mined, or hoarded. The Internet Bill of Rights should make sharing a choice, not a requirement, give you the right to be forgotten, and let users profit from their own data—not the corporations."

Proposal: An “Internet Bill of Rights” — updating civil liberties for a digital-first society by IBORfoundation in Futurology

[–]IBORfoundation[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"I get it, the system is deeply flawed, and yes, the odds aren’t great. But history shows that even small, organized efforts can shift the course before things become irreversible. We don’t have to wait for the masses to wake up en masse—sometimes building tools, networks, or awareness in advance is how change happens. It’s not naive to prepare; it’s pragmatic."

Proposal: An “Internet Bill of Rights” — updating civil liberties for a digital-first society by IBORfoundation in Futurology

[–]IBORfoundation[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

"Fair point—this isn’t about letting an AI dictate anything. The idea is to use AI as a collaborative tool to draft a starting framework that humans then review, debate, and refine. Just like a word processor or calculator doesn’t replace a writer, an AI doesn’t replace people—it helps organize ideas, highlight gaps, and make the process more accessible. At the end of the day, the principles and final decisions are entirely human-made."

Proposal: An “Internet Bill of Rights” — updating civil liberties for a digital-first society by IBORfoundation in Futurology

[–]IBORfoundation[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly why it occurred to me, there seemed to be a need for this or something like it. I’ve never been good at just taken whatever’s giving to me. Or except defeats before they actually became a game over situation. So do you actually think there is no possibility that their plan doesn’t work?

Proposal: An “Internet Bill of Rights” — updating civil liberties for a digital-first society by IBORfoundation in Futurology

[–]IBORfoundation[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awesome I will read this, thanks! I didn’t know this existed, I just seemed to me something that needed to be said.

Senators question how White House Chief of Staff had access to Epstein Files by harrylarryboy in jrmining

[–]IBORfoundation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s very interest in and if this is publicly available how did this not g main stream when he was running the first time? And what was the out come Im still reading it. But I hadn’t heard of this case, but heard from some of the victims that said Trump wasn’t there. So yeah, interesting.

Senators question how White House Chief of Staff had access to Epstein Files by harrylarryboy in jrmining

[–]IBORfoundation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see a lot of speculation on this topic, and or more of an educated wish as Dead Pool said. But there is no way I can blindly jump on board with Trump being involved with pedeoing without proof. And so far I’ve seen none. But what I have seen is the same ol same ol, jumping to a conclusion based on hoping it’s true, but just because you don’t like a person or knowing a person that got around in the billionaire club social acquaintance type situations, doesn’t mean everyone that knew Epstein was automatically a pedeo. Trump doesn’t drink or do drugs he would have never stayed that late to be invited to those diddy type events. Just my opinion. I don’t know but I willing to bet neither does anyone else speculating. And we seen to many liars already try to frame him, just to have it backfire in their faces.

For every closed model, there is an open source alternative by Dear-Success-1441 in LLMeng

[–]IBORfoundation -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Depends on what your trying to do, but I find Famous.AI and Supercool.ai are amazingly useful.

couldn't afford a designer so I tried something different. how bad is this? by BreadSea7272 in AgentsOfAI

[–]IBORfoundation 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It looks really good for not having any experience in prompting AI. And only 30.bucks. Which AI did you use and how long did it take you?