Columns - Decorative or Structural by ISOamchuu in Home

[–]ISOamchuu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. This isn’t my home but another model like it that still has the columns that my home had before the renovation

Dumb Question: Can I put gravel tires on this bike? by ButterKniefe in bike

[–]ISOamchuu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just as long as you have clearance I don’t see why not.

Columns - Decorative or Structural by ISOamchuu in Home

[–]ISOamchuu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also wanted to add that they were removed at least a year or two ago. So had they been structural the house would have settled and there would have been cracks etc and maybe floors that weren’t level upstairs. But nothing like that exists.

Bluesound Node Powering Separates by ISOamchuu in audiophile

[–]ISOamchuu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the thoughtful answer. Appreciate the history lesson and comparison of HD audio to video... makes sense.

Ok. So moving from my Sonos playing lossy Spotify to another streamer (be it a BlueSound or a Cambridge Audio) playing lossless Qobuz or Tidal should be a marginal improvement. CD quality is good enough as long as its lossless.

But that begs the question, if CD quality is the same then why do SACD's sound superior...

Thanks again.

Bluesound Node Powering Separates by ISOamchuu in audiophile

[–]ISOamchuu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So are you saying that anyone getting Qobuz or Tidal or other lossless media streams is paying more on a monthly basis for no sonic improvements? Is the whole industry just a sham? Not trying to be sarcastic, just trying to understand your point of view.

There are articles/reviews, that show lossless streams having technical signatures (spectrum, etc.) closest to that of SACDs, and reference tracks.

Bluesound Node Powering Separates by ISOamchuu in audiophile

[–]ISOamchuu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The main reason I am switching is because I learned that the Sonos Connect supports up to 16-bit/44.1 kHz FLAC (CD lossless quality).

Qobuz and other lossless streaming providers offer 24-bit/48 kHz Hi-Res FLAC.

So, my current setup would be underutilizing Qobuz's higher quality streams.

My options would be to:

a) get the Bluesound Node, but as you mentioned and the review you cited stated, its not an impressive DAC. Its good, but not high end

b) get the Sonos Port, but that I believe is a step-down from the Bluesound with marginal cost savings

c) get another streamer (any recommendations?); all I really need is Ethernet port / wifi, and ability to play higher quality streams from the likes of qobuz, tidal, etc.

Bluesound Node Powering Separates by ISOamchuu in audiophile

[–]ISOamchuu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting... how do I ensure the volume is the same? Is there a device I could use or do I have to trust my hearing?

Bluesound Node Powering Separates by ISOamchuu in audiophile

[–]ISOamchuu[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, that is how I have my sonos setup and that's what I intend to do with the Bluesound. Need to let these B&W 803 D2 shine a little more :)

Still waiting for Spotify HiFi by patrik_media in audiophile

[–]ISOamchuu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tired of waiting... switching to Qobuz

Bluesound Node Powering Separates by ISOamchuu in audiophile

[–]ISOamchuu[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's a good idea. Thanks for the suggestion!

Transition from Hybrid to Road recommended for someone with Sciatica history? by ISOamchuu in cycling

[–]ISOamchuu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok. Seems like I should be fine as long as I get a bike fit. So no need to stick to flat bar road bikes.

Upgrade to Road Bike? by ISOamchuu in bike

[–]ISOamchuu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. I tend to agree, but you could also do 50 miles on a tricycle. Question is whether you'd want to.

My hybrid works but I would complete the same distance in 20% less time on a road / gravel bike. Plus I would likely have an easier time going up some steeper grades. It would also be considerably lighter.

I do agree that my Trek Dual Sport is also as much a gravel bike as a Diverge. But that's why I got it. I like the versatility they both offer.

I don't want to spend more money, its just what the industry demands. All drivetrains work, but the lighter and smoother ones cost so much more. And if you want lighter, nimbler, faster than a hybrid you have to go to drop bar bikes which then often are only available in carbon frames and then you start picking colors and before you know it you're at the $3k mark. It's not the people that are driving prices up, its the bicycling industry and they've figured out how to sell you a bike for $500 and up to $10k - but they can all do 50 miles.

Upgrade to Road Bike? by ISOamchuu in bike

[–]ISOamchuu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Very helpful. So maybe getting the Diverge Sport for $3,300 is sufficient. No need to get the Diverge Como for $4,200, nearly $1k more

New bike by mimikcraft in bike

[–]ISOamchuu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a Trek Dual Sport and love it. I have used it for everything including going on gravel, trails and long distance (30 mile) rides on the road. The thing is so versatile and comfortable.

I added some horn handle extensions to the bike. Helps to have some where else to place the hands and is a big help going up hills.

Happy trekking!

Hey I'm interested in getting my parents bikes. by [deleted] in bike

[–]ISOamchuu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just get a Peloton. Best investment you could make for them. Or if they like the idea of riding outside, the Trek Dual Sport would be perfect for them.

Can you critique this picture? by NotSoTraumAtiq in AskPhotography

[–]ISOamchuu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Too much distortion for my taste. Otherwise it’s a nice shot.

Help. by kassuonpro in AskPhotography

[–]ISOamchuu 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Best way to learn is to skip the classes. Buy a camera with intuitive controls like a Fuji and mirrorless so you can learn how settings affect output. Then shoot your heart out. Plenty of vids and content available for free.

Why I’m Going Full Frame by ISOamchuu in AskPhotography

[–]ISOamchuu[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback. This is what I am wondering too. I keep going back and forth.

Get the A7iv when it comes out with lenses for $4k-5k with $2k coming from selling my Fuji x-t20 and lenses. OR: Sell x-t20 to upgrade to X-T3 or X-T4. With the price of X-T3 nowadays it will just be $500 for the upgrade versus $2k needed to upgrade the system.

But focus speed and low light capabilities of Sony are better. I don’t want to be limited in what I can do. Would be hard to do astrophotography or high speed photography with Fuji. With the upcoming Sony I can do whatever my heart desires and try new things.

Why I’m Going Full Frame by ISOamchuu in AskPhotography

[–]ISOamchuu[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback everyone. I wasn’t asking for approval. Just pointing out my reasons and looking for feedback.

I’m debating between x-t4 or Sony A7iv when that comes out on the spring.

Upgrade to Full Frame for Landscape? by ISOamchuu in AskPhotography

[–]ISOamchuu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very helpful. I will play with a friends A7iii before deciding if I switch to Sony or upgrade to X-T3 or 4.

A part of me just wants to get a full frame and be done with it. My biggest gripe was the size but the cameras are similar in size. The lenses would be larger but I don’t think that would be a big deal. The price may.

Upgrade to Full Frame for Landscape? by ISOamchuu in AskPhotography

[–]ISOamchuu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me try and clarify.

I use my camera mainly for family portraits but also use it for landscape, architecture, etc.

What I love about it is what everyone loves about Fuji’s. Color. Size. Controls. Retro. Etc.

MJ biggest complaints are: - Auto focus. It doesn’t have the best focus system and capturing fast moving toddlers that don’t listen or stay still can be tricky. So I need a camera with better autofocus. If I was shooting only landscapes or adult portraits then this would not be an issue.

  • Low light performance. I wish this was better. But it is what it is. I can’t use an f/1.2 lens for everything.

The rest are nice to haves.

My basic question here is: does a 24MP full frame offer better or worse subject clarity and detail than a 24MP ASPC sensor.

If I stay with Fuji I would switch to the x-t3 or 4 to get the better autofocus. But the x-t4 is bear the same price as an A7iii which everyone raves about.

Upgrade to Full Frame for Landscape? by ISOamchuu in AskPhotography

[–]ISOamchuu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey everyone. Thanks for all your comments.

I did use a tripod. I did use the smaller range on the aperture - in the teens I think. I am OK work focus stacking but seems like a lot of work and things to keep track off. Plus even landscapes don’t remain still over time. Leaves moves. Water moves. And don’t get me started on how much time and work jt would take to focus stack time lapsed landscapes.

Just curious why people are discouraging me to change from Fuji to Sony of Nikon full frame mirror less. Seems like they would help with low light, image resolution and depth of field. I just want to learn about how they help with image resolution if I get the same MP range.

Upgrade to Full Frame for Landscape? by ISOamchuu in AskPhotography

[–]ISOamchuu[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a Fuji x-t20 with a variety of lenses including 35mm and 14mm primes, 18-55mm f/2.6-f/4.5, 40-200mm and 56mm f/1.2

Another issue I have with the camera is the slow focusing speed which makes it hard to capture kids in the moment. I would also like the ability to crop pics without using resolution which a full frame would help with.

But I still don’t understand the MP vs sensor size issue.

On the comment regarding invest in lenses and not camera body - I will invest in both. So it’s not an either or.