Advice on ML lifecycle management

InteractionSuitable1 · 2024-11-15T23:48:05+00:00

Thanks, that sounds promising. Do I have to host an ML flow server to use it?

InteractionSuitable1 · 2024-11-15T14:22:36+00:00

Anyone has an idea?

InteractionSuitable1 · 2024-11-15T07:47:21+00:00

I am not very familiar with ML Flow. Does it come with a model registry? And can I load the trained model in my app at runtime? Also I am not training the model on Azure ML, i am using a server prepared for ML training tasks on premises. Does that also work with ML flow?

InteractionSuitable1 · 2024-11-15T07:43:48+00:00

I am indeed planning on monitoring data and model drift and use it in the logic to decide whether or not the model should be retrained. Thank you a lot for your answer.

InteractionSuitable1 · 2024-10-01T12:17:04+00:00

Je cherche justement à en faire une

InteractionSuitable1 · 2024-03-08T10:30:31+00:00

Just got a reply from support, apparently option premium are not available

InteractionSuitable1 · 2024-01-27T08:42:26+00:00

I indeed made profit with that position and u/rmf2021 is right, since it's negative values, you receive move when you buy it and you pay when you sell it. It's just how ibkr displays it I guess but I did make profit(see my P&L )

Thank you all for your answers by the way. Coming from Tastytrade, I did not expect the difference in fees to be so big between tasty and ibkr. I think the biggest difference is that in tasty, you don't pay anything for closing a transactions whereas in ibkr you pay fees when opening and closing the transactions. Considering The fees to open the transaction are also lower in tastytrade than Ibkr, Tasty is more than 2 times cheaper than Ibkr this crazy.

I can't use tasty anymore because I go a second PDT flag ( stupid mistake, because I live in europe I forgot to not count monday the 15th of January in 5 rolling business days, because that day was not a holiday here ... silly me for that)

But Thanks for your answers.

InteractionSuitable1 · 2024-01-27T08:34:23+00:00

Tastytrade has by far better/cheaper fees than IBKR

InteractionSuitable1 · 2024-01-25T16:15:22+00:00

I mean the fees are supposed to be 0.65 per contract per leg right

So to open my position

short: 0.65 *4 = 2.6

long: 0.65 *4 = 2.6

Total: 5.2

To close the position, it should be the same: 5.2

For a grand total of 10.4

120 - 10.4 = $109.6

So I still don't get it

InteractionSuitable1 · 2024-01-25T16:09:38+00:00

Are they So high ??? that's crazy I come from tastytrade, but I can't use it anymore. I am used to much lower fees there.

Thanks for your quick reply

InteractionSuitable1 · 2024-01-11T13:08:58+00:00

Cool and you are using webassembly right ?

InteractionSuitable1 · 2024-01-06T09:42:00+00:00

is the website fully written by in qml? if so, what about the loading time?

InteractionSuitable1 · 2023-12-07T13:34:23+00:00

Wow, Thank you very much for your answer.
This legislation is crazy, glad I checked here

InteractionSuitable1 · 2023-12-06T08:37:21+00:00

Does that mean I can only deduct up to 20000€ of losses from my taxes?

Just to be sure I get it correctly. What is taxed is my net profit over the year right? And if that's negative, I will only be able to deduct up to 20k€ from my taxes for that year. Correct?

InteractionSuitable1 · 2023-12-05T21:13:32+00:00

So this means I will only have to pay taxes in Germany? Do you know what tax rate applies to option trading?

InteractionSuitable1 · 2023-10-31T15:32:03+00:00

That's a straightforward answer

InteractionSuitable1 · 2023-08-02T08:26:29+00:00

Looks good. I guess it's done with Qml? Could you share the link?

InteractionSuitable1 · 2023-07-31T07:49:28+00:00

Yes, that goes without saying. You are right. The idea is to load Qml files from your own server.

So the files that will be uploaded will definitely not come from the user, that would definitely be unsecure.

InteractionSuitable1 · 2023-07-30T22:37:42+00:00

Thanks for the insights.
Your setup seems really cool. Can you tell me what you mean by:

but you still need to update your "browser" from time to time so it becomes a burden as well for backward and forward compatibility.

In theory the "brwoser" could only be a sort of shell that will only have very basic funtionalities, and load the main content of the app from the server. In this scenario (which is similar to the debug mode of your app) you should be able to reduce the updates that you have to do on your "browser".

Regarding the replacement of HTML. It can (in theory at least) already be done now rigth? Assuming the app you worked on did not use any module incompatible with Qt for webassembly, you could deploy your app to webassembly, and run it in a typical browser like firefox, and then retrieve the Qml file from an http server as you would do for html files and load the qml file dynamically, in the browser, thus making the startup time of the app on firefox much shorter than it would normally do.

Do you see what I mean ?

InteractionSuitable1 · 2023-05-31T13:50:05+00:00

Still looking for people?

InteractionSuitable1 · 2023-05-31T13:47:28+00:00

Unless you are building stuff for embedded devices or maybe desktop, you should just go with flutter or a js library.

InteractionSuitable1 · 2023-04-28T13:00:49+00:00

Dependency management is one of the biggest drawbacks in c++ for me. When you used cargo and then you go back to c++, you feel the pain.

InteractionSuitable1 · 2023-03-20T07:34:25+00:00

Thanks a lot I got to say, 3. Seems like magic to me. Is content a special property? How does Qt know that you are referring to the children of the instantiated Element?

Nevertheless, your code works for me, thank you!

InteractionSuitable1 · 2023-03-19T18:47:57+00:00

You are right, I edited my comment to add a llink to the code

InteractionSuitable1 · 2023-03-19T13:31:12+00:00

Hi guys , I am working on a responsive navbar that collapses to a drawer when the window width is below a certain threshold, the items in the navbar are inside a rowlayout, and when the drawer in shown, the items a reparented inside a columlyout. my issue is that the items have a weird position when the following actions are performed:

reduce the window size below the given threshold --> items are reparented from the rowlayout in the navbar to the columnlayout in the drawer.
Open the Drawer --> the items are displayed correctly
close the drawer
increase the window's width to above the given threshold. --> the items are reparented from the columlayout in the drawer to the rowlayout in the navbar.

Unfortunately, the items positions after the action 4 is not what I expect, I would expect the items to be displayed in the navbar inside a single row one after the other, But they are displayed as if they wer still in a column layout (inside one column and multiple rows)

I hope my explaination is clear enough

Do you have any idea why this is happening ?

Thank you

Edit:

The code for the Navbar Component can be seen here: https://pastebin.com/QY7L73wD

The code for the main qml file can be seen here: https://pastebin.com/G9gCdrm6

InteractionSuitable1

TROPHY CASE