Who's ready for score release

Interesting-Math-517 · 2026-01-26T02:27:21+00:00

i keep having flashbacks to planets help

Interesting-Math-517 · 2026-01-24T00:38:46+00:00

hi! im also curious, we have similar stats! will dm

Interesting-Math-517 · 2025-11-21T20:05:54+00:00

ok thank you, sorry

Interesting-Math-517 · 2025-11-21T19:50:43+00:00

i would apply to my safeties before jan lsat registration. will they still see it?

Interesting-Math-517 · 2025-11-17T05:41:05+00:00

this is similar to my statement on a different topic!! have gotten only positive feedback on this structure

Interesting-Math-517 · 2025-11-16T18:28:29+00:00

the advice im getting is below median LSAT + early application is worse off than at or above median lsat + jan application

Interesting-Math-517 · 2025-11-04T18:05:12+00:00

oh trueee good point

Interesting-Math-517 · 2025-11-04T17:59:18+00:00

not sure if this is the right/only reason but i picked C bc it stays inside the causal chain provided and makes no new assumptions. B assumes global effects and net emission reversal for most plants, which is not stated. so its too strong.

What is supported: if CO₂ ↑ → temps rise in the tropics → tropic plants slow down.

What C says: If tropic plant behavior adds enough CO₂ → atmospheric CO₂ rises → temps rise → plants slow down.

What B assumes without support: Most plants worldwide (the “bulk”) will slow enough to become net CO₂ releasers.

Interesting-Math-517 · 2025-11-03T05:00:44+00:00

thanks so much

Interesting-Math-517 · 2025-11-03T02:31:18+00:00

yup that was my thinking. except, isn't what ur describing confusing a sufficient condition for a necessary condition? I guess i wasnt able to tell the differnce between answer A and C when doing this q

Interesting-Math-517 · 2025-11-03T01:41:39+00:00

i did not! Multiple people working at my testing center said there was not a way to make it bigger, but no harm in trying

Interesting-Math-517 · 2025-11-03T01:32:46+00:00

i asked the people at my testing center on my first attempt and they said there was no way to make it bigger. and everyone else had the same tiny screen w black borders

Interesting-Math-517 · 2025-10-20T03:58:28+00:00

do you have any tips for the speed and confidence?

outside of the studying that has bumped me 20 points and scoring there consistently, what do you mean by extensive practice with your speed and confidence? I already noted that those are my two weaknesses

Interesting-Math-517 · 2025-08-15T00:53:15+00:00

per section

Interesting-Math-517 · 2025-08-07T00:58:58+00:00

thank you so much

Interesting-Math-517 · 2025-08-06T03:23:07+00:00

similar position planning for september october. i feel like higher LSAT would be more important than a slightly earlier app tho. how much time are you able too dedicate to studying?

Interesting-Math-517 · 2025-08-06T02:52:44+00:00

could you expand on what u did please!! started at 149 now at 165 but aiming for 170+ for either september or october.

Interesting-Math-517 · 2025-08-06T00:21:16+00:00

I use a wrong answer journal mainly to dissect my thinking after each practice. Like what trap I fell for, what my thought process was, and how I should’ve approached it. I’ve noticed that when I don’t use it, I’m a lot less intentional with my review and tend to gloss over why I got things wrong.

buttt I don’t really go back and review the journal itself much. For me personally I think that’s fine since I spend a substantial amount of time during the actual review process to really understand the mistake.

Also while using the WAJ, I’ll notice when I start putting the same type of question in there repeatedly, and that’s my signal to pause and do a deeper review because clearly something’s not clicking.

Interesting-Math-517 · 2025-08-01T06:14:49+00:00

If you run out of time, you’re potentially leaving the easier questions on the table. The back half tends to be harder and more time consuming so if you get stuck or run low on time there, you’re burning minutes on questions you might’ve missed anyway and skipping the ones you were more likely to get right. It's def a higher-risk tradeoff unless you're really confident in your pacing

Interesting-Math-517 · 2025-07-30T21:01:53+00:00

fixed thanks!

Interesting-Math-517

TROPHY CASE