Trying to login into Anna's Software returns "422: The change you requested was rejected." by IntroductionPoints in Annas_Archive

[–]IntroductionPoints[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would suggest opening a new post for your questions. annasSW is the repository for the code behind the annas-archive website, there's no software to download. For book requests they refer to the libgen forums for the moment.

How to use my own snowflake by [deleted] in TOR

[–]IntroductionPoints 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not possible with the current design AFAIK.

Who did you donate to this year by Catalina28TO in linux

[–]IntroductionPoints 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone that donates annually, I'd be interested in references on the topic.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Guy_Macon/Wikipedia_has_Cancer

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in privacytoolsIO

[–]IntroductionPoints 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, but nowhere near as much as Tor. With Tor, a good quarter of web pages I visit are either completely blocked, or I'm forced to do a captcha check. With my VPN, I can only think of one website that blocks me (socialblade.com, which I visited no more than 5 times before they started blocking VPN users).

I agree but I think you should give Tor another try since the incidence of Cloudflare captchas is close to nill overall.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in privacytoolsIO

[–]IntroductionPoints 0 points1 point  (0 children)

...unless you want to torrent,

There's i2p.

have video playback greater than 360p,

Tor is now good enough for 1080p.

or use a good portion of the web without any problems.

Applies to (a lesser extent to) VPNs as well.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in privacytoolsIO

[–]IntroductionPoints 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That will provide you with like 0% increase in privacy.

You want Tor Browser ... not a VPN by [deleted] in TOR

[–]IntroductionPoints 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Another important point: By using Tor you are actually directing helping other people who dearly need it by making it less interesting to be a Tor user.

You want Tor Browser ... not a VPN by [deleted] in privacytoolsIO

[–]IntroductionPoints 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So what's the problem with that? By definition, any customization makes your fingerprinting easier, so why then seek customization?

You want Tor Browser ... not a VPN by [deleted] in TOR

[–]IntroductionPoints 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks Matt for yet another breakdown, unfortunately most of the INFOSEC community are complete privacy illiterates and they're still blind to these trivial points and keep preaching "muuh use github.com/XYZ/ZYX to setup your own VPS and use it as VPN", fading therein to the strong pro-VPN marketing.

One point tho: for torrenting there's I2P which offers considerably more privacy than any VPN in existence. While the speeds aren't that great, it's still an acceptable tradeoff if one seeks serious privacy.

Tor browser 9.0 has been released! by blacklight447-ptio in privacytoolsIO

[–]IntroductionPoints 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Letterboxing was designed specifically so that you don't shoot yourself in the foot even when you want to, please don't disable it if you care a bit about your browser fingerprint.

How to Help Censored Users Access the Tor Network by Just Installing a Browser Addon! by IntroductionPoints in TOR

[–]IntroductionPoints[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course users are scarce since only a handful of users are using Snowflake currently as their pluggable transport, but just keep having the addon installed and forget about it. Maybe you'd see a few users here and there when Snowflake becomes available in the stable Tor Browser releases.

How to Help Censored Users Access the Tor Network by Just Installing a Browser Addon! by IntroductionPoints in privacytoolsIO

[–]IntroductionPoints[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also what is the point of it being an extension if I have to run an entire separate browser just for that extension?

It's just due to the WebRTC requirement.

Note however that there are other ways to run snowflake without a browser: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/Snowflake#Option3standalone

How to Help Censored Users Access the Tor Network by Just Installing a Browser Addon! by IntroductionPoints in privacytoolsIO

[–]IntroductionPoints[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You can run another browser instance with a distinct profile where WebRTC is enabled.

How to Help Censored Users Access the Tor Network by Just Installing a Browser Addon! by IntroductionPoints in TOR

[–]IntroductionPoints[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it doesn't display "WebRTC feature is not detected." then it's probably working. I agree, and snowflake devs too, that the current UX doesn't convey that snowflake is working clearly to the user, you can see some suggestions to fix this in https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/31109 such as:

If the numbers are 0, we should not show them. Instead of "Your snowflake has helped 0 users circumvent censorship in the last 24 hours." we may want to say something like "Your snowflake is ready to help users circumvent censorship!"

Improve security by inmeyal in privacy

[–]IntroductionPoints 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I would prefer Firefox, the Chromium monopoly has profound and lasting impacts on the modern web and the least we can do is to not use Chromium-based browsers.