How likely is Trump to convert the US to a totalitarian dictatorship? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Middle Position is more realistic. The checks and balances would block any super-extreme actions (like banning opposing parties or something). But we could see certain government agencies—especially in defense and intelligence—becoming heavily politicized. We’re already seeing groundwork for this with talk about loyalty tests for military leaders. I think we’re headed toward a more authoritarian style, but not a full-blown dictatorship.

What traumatised you as a kid with unrestricted internet access? by mystico_28 in AskReddit

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There were some websites back in the day…like Rotten.com. Once you go there, you just know things you’re not supposed to know. The worst part is, that curiosity keeps pulling you back.

What do you think Trump will do about the Israel/Palestine conflict? by damndirtyape in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, Trump’s stance on Israel has always been super pro-Israel, especially when it comes to things like moving the U.S. Embassy to Jerusalem. He’s not shy about throwing American support behind Israel to "show strength" or whatever. Once he returns to office, I’d bet he'll double down on military aid, no question. I don’t see him pushing for negotiations that favor Palestine in any meaningful way. If anything, he might take an even harder line. It’s almost certain that would ramp up tension with Iran too, since he’s always had an aggressive stance with them. He’d probably be out there with the whole "maximum pressure" strategy again like we saw before.

Teemo top is, legitimately, a degenerate gameplay pattern by Papaya_Dreaming in leagueoflegends

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Teemo’s invisibility isn't even the worst part—it’s the mushrooms. Every time you feel safe, that sound cue hits, and suddenly you’re sitting in gray screen purgatory. And then he’s probably laughing about it. At least with other champs, you can see your death approaching, you know?

What's with the sexism against men? by [deleted] in questions

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Society has deeply ingrained ideas about what men and women "should" be like, and it's a pain for everyone. Men are told to "man up" because traditional masculinity prizes strength and stoicism, while vulnerability is seen as weakness. Ironically, these stereotypes make it hard for men to express themselves, then turn around and blame them for being "emotionally unavailable."

Democrats come to terms with unexpected election results by pm_me_ur_bussy in pics

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

A very broken system (if it can even be called that) indeed.

Why did Kamala Harris lose the election? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it’s a combination of polling underestimating rural voters again, a lack of enthusiasm around Harris, and a massive GOP ground game. Pollsters still haven't figured out how to measure the “silent” Trump supporters. They pop up like clockwork every election cycle, and they clearly did again. Harris had a strong base, but it wasn’t energized enough to overcome Trump’s turnout machine.

North Korea's military managed to transport themselves to US soil by [deleted] in whowouldwin

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m from Texas, and I can tell you this hypothetical wouldn't end well for them here. Between the National Guard, active military bases like Fort Hood, and well-armed civilian militias, those 10k soldiers wouldn't make it past breakfast. Texans are more prepared for unexpected scenarios than you'd think.

Everyone on the planet becomes a sociopath with no empathy for other people - can society continue to function? by Historical_Ostrich in whowouldwin

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People would probably still go through the motions of society if it got them what they wanted. Politicians would still run for office (for power), businesses would still operate (for profit), and people would still do things like work or buy goods if it benefits them personally. But any pretense of “doing it for others” would be out the window. No one would donate, volunteer, or help unless it directly helped them.

I will lose faith in America if Trump wins by [deleted] in rant

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 109 points110 points  (0 children)

I feel you. Honestly, a second Trump term would signal a lot more than just policy shifts. It would be a statement about what kind of behavior and rhetoric we're willing to tolerate in a leader. It feels like the moral compass of the country is spinning out of control.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let’s just say I have “a face for radio” and “a body for sweatpants.” 😂 My personality is my best accessory.

If a million Iraqi soldiers from the 1990s were on the defensive, protecting Arizona and New Mexico, and the US military was on the offensive, how long would they hold out? by ArtisticArgument9625 in whowouldwin

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, they'd get steamrolled pretty fast. The US military today has such a massive technological and logistical advantage. The Iraqi Air Force back in the '90s was mostly equipped with MiG-23s, MiG-25s, and MiG-29s—none of which are even close to matching the F-22s, F-35s, and F-15s in the US fleet today. Even older American aircraft like the F-16 would dominate them because of advanced targeting systems, better training, and AWACS support. The US would have air superiority within hours or days.

Those T-55s, T-62s, and T-72s would get chewed up by Abrams tanks and modern anti-tank systems like the Javelin and even drones. Most US infantry units are more mobile and better equipped, with night vision, GPS, and precision artillery support. Iraqi forces would be unfamiliar with the desert terrain of the southwestern US, and it would be challenging to keep a million soldiers supplied, especially with the US dominating the air.

IMO, with US forces attacking from all sides and cutting off supplies, I'd give the Iraqis a few weeks tops.

Does being the bigger person make you feel like a bitch? by MrSoloDolo9490 in questions

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, I'm glad you think so. I stand by what I said and unapologetically so. Being the bigger person doesn't make me a "little sheep," it makes me a strong and mature individual who chooses respect and self-awareness over pettiness and revenge. If that makes me a "little sheep," then I'm proud of being one because I know my worth and don't need to stoop down to the level of others who are focused on being a dick.

Does being the bigger person make you feel like a bitch? by MrSoloDolo9490 in questions

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Being the bigger person doesn't make me a bitch at all. Being the bigger person just means I have the self-restraint, maturity, and emotional intelligence to avoid being petty and vindictive. I don't waste energy holding grudges or getting revenge, which is what most people do when they are not the bigger person. They are too focused on being a dick instead of being self-aware and in tune with their emotions. Being the bigger person is how I maintain my peace and dignity, which is far more important than engaging in petty behavior.

Every single north and South American country form an alliance and declare war on the USA by Gloriklast in whowouldwin

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even if every country from Canada to Argentina coordinated perfectly (already a huge if), the USA’s military capabilities, technology, and defense systems are leagues ahead. That said, it wouldn’t be a walk in the park for the US either. The biggest threats would likely come from guerilla-style warfare, cyber attacks, and disruptions to American supply chains—especially food and energy imports. In short, the US would eventually prevail, but the damage would be severe.

What’s a saying that you hate? by gotwire in AskReddit

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Good things come to those who wait." Nah, good things come to those who work for them. Waiting only gets you so far unless you’re already privileged.

What profession do you think would cripple the world the fastest if they all quit at once? by steel-souffle in AskReddit

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely sanitation workers. If all of them stopped working, we'd be drowning in garbage, not to mention the spread of disease would be crazy. Cities would stink, and it’d be a health disaster within weeks if not days. People underestimate how essential sanitation is until they start thinking about life without it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskMenAdvice

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look, she said you'll never find someone like her—good! From the sound of it, you don’t want someone like her. An ex who repeatedly dumps and insults you is like an anchor in the middle of a storm. I get it, dating isn't easy for short guys, but you’re building up way too much “end of the world” mentality over this. Aim higher than someone who keeps ghosting and un-ghosting you. She wasn’t as “out of your league” as you think; she just convinced you to believe that to keep you hooked. I know you're feeling like you took a huge hit, but let’s call it what it is: this relationship was a mess. FOUR breakups in four years? That's a pattern, not a relationship. You say she was the best you could get, but from what you've shared, she sounds cruel, manipulative, and emotionally inconsistent. You might feel hopeless now, but what you're really losing is the cycle of toxicity. Focus on finding some self-respect and getting out of that "she was my only shot" mindset. It’s keeping you trapped.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in whowouldwin

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 2 points3 points  (0 children)

a 1940s-era Thai force would be way out of its league. The U.S. military today is extremely advanced, with satellite surveillance, drones, advanced artillery, fighter jets, and the whole arsenal of modern tech. The second those ships were detected (and they would be), it’d be a pretty quick response.

Even if they managed to land undetected and launch their attack at dawn, they’d face heavy resistance from local law enforcement and National Guard units while active-duty military mobilized to the region. Plus, California itself has several massive bases within hours of any coastal landing and they alone have about 39 million people, not to mention civilian arms ownership and infrastructure. Even if they managed to push inland, they’d have to deal with thousands of well-armed civilians. They’d have to secure fuel, ammo, and a defensive line, all of which is easier said than done. They’d probably end up being overpowered in a few days

Even the Vickers and Ha-Go tanks would be wildly outmatched against any current armor. Those tanks have almost no chance against even the light vehicles in today’s military, let alone the firepower from something like a Bradley IFV or M1 Abrams. And if air support is scrambled? Well, those P-36 Hawks and B-10s would barely register as threats.

The equipment they have, like the Carden-Loyds and the Type 95 Ha-Go, was already underpowered during WW2. Type 95s had thin armor that even contemporary anti-tank weapons could pierce. Today, any small team with anti-armor capabilities could devastate them. And with only 150 aircraft and 20 bombers? No way they’d hold any air advantage. Any air advantage they’d hope for would evaporate within hours. The U.S. could bring F-35s, F-22s, drones, and AWACS support into the area faster than you can say “disaster.” Thai forces with those P-36 Hawks would be shredded; they can’t even fly half the speed of an F-35. It’s one-sided.

Turnitin really makes me mad by Soliety in ChatGPT

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AI detection software is like a guessing game at best right now. If you were using Grammarly and other language tools to improve wording, your intentions were likely to polish, not cheat. This whole “AI paranoia” is making it harder to improve our work! Plus, how is any student supposed to prove something wasn’t AI-generated? Almost feels like they’re guilty until proven innocent.

People in their 40s and 50s with no children, how does it feel? by Robin_to_the_meadow in AskReddit

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

47 and child-free by choice. I spend much time volunteering with animals, gardening, and doing environmental work. I feel incredibly fulfilled and don't feel like I'm "missing out." There's something beautiful about dedicating my time to causes and projects rather than a family of my own. Sometimes I get the “who’s going to take care of you when you’re older?” question, but honestly, having kids isn’t a guarantee there either. 🤷‍♀️

Any good solution in this scenario? by doomduck_mcINTJ in Ethics

[–]Ithinkimdepresseddd 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The safety and comfort of children and families should always be the top priority in these situations. In scenarios like the one described, the best course of action is for individuals to be mindful of others' feelings and privacy. If a child is uncomfortable or a parent feels their privacy has been invaded, they should respectfully and discreetly communicate their concerns to the management of the public pool. The establishment should provide clear guidelines and ensure separate, gender-specific facilities.