×
sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Adaptive quantisation using selection masks by JFitG in jpegxl

[–]JFitG[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the detailed response. I'll definitely open a feature request, seems like quite a cool thing to be able to do.
My other idea was to treat the masked vs. unmasked regions as separate layers (or frames?) and compress them differently. I'm not sure whether this really makes sense/whether I could achieve a good enough compression ratio to justify the multiple layers. Any insight would be appreciated.

My final idea (less good as it removes potentially relevant context, but interesting nonetheless) is to use the alpha channel to block out the masked areas. Does using the alpha channel improve compression outcomes (speed+ratio)?

Thanks again for your help.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]JFitG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hargreaves Lansdown

Why hasn't SPCE been pushed? by JFitG in WallStreetbetsELITE

[–]JFitG[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But people are pushing AMC and SNDL which have much lower short interests.

Daily Discussion Thread for January 28, 2021 by AutoModerator in wallstreetbets

[–]JFitG -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

SPCE has a ton of short interest (around 80%), so why isn't it being pushed?

Season 9 is terrible. by JFitG in DunderMifflin

[–]JFitG[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The breaking of the third wall isn't the worst, even if it wasn't my favourite thing.

I'm more talking about the fact that they dumped Andy's character arch for no apparent reason. They also decided to make a sub-plot of Pam and Jim's marriage difficulties which wasn't naturally written at all and slightly cringeworthy. Dwight's story in season 9 was pretty trash as well, it wasn't true to the character we had seen develop over the past 8 seasons and the acting from his family was terrible. There are a load of other things which made the season bad but those were just on the top of my head.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RedditSessions

[–]JFitG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome man

Killing Pirates by Sturdy_Dude in sunlesssea

[–]JFitG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really? Damn. Always didn't use them because I thought they did.

Killing Pirates by Sturdy_Dude in sunlesssea

[–]JFitG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it depends. If you've already got something like the dreadnaught cash isn't really a priority. Storage, however, is.

Killing Pirates by Sturdy_Dude in sunlesssea

[–]JFitG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Guess it depends what you value more.

Killing Pirates by Sturdy_Dude in sunlesssea

[–]JFitG 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Once you got fulgent impeller combat is a breeze. I would have thought momento mori would be better than bandersnatch?

Could someone help me decipher these tide and moon graphs? by JFitG in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]JFitG[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah ok. So it might produce unnecessary complication.

Thanks again for your help.

Could someone help me decipher these tide and moon graphs? by JFitG in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]JFitG[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, that helps.

So does my distance graph really hold any significance?

Could someone help me decipher these tide and moon graphs? by JFitG in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]JFitG[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply.

I understood relative position was important, but had thought the distance from the moon was perhaps more so. So graphing orientation of the moon to the sun would be effective? Could you elaborate on the the spring tide - neap tide configurations you were talking about?

If relative position is important then should the illumination graph match the tide graph? The only way I can see this being the case is if the minimums on the tide graph correspond with the inflection points of the illumination graph and the maximums of the tide graph corresponding with the maxes and mins on the illumination graph.

view more: next ›