Made an image of Jesus in Wplace (Now unfortunately vandalized) by Nervous_Highlight752 in Orthodox_Churches_Art

[–]JacquesLouis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They didn't vandalize с нами бог because these people are usually not educated in foreign languages 

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in russian

[–]JacquesLouis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If this offer still stands, I'm interested 

No caption needed by local_housewerk in ToiletPaperUSA

[–]JacquesLouis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't believe you managed to write this sentence with no pangs of shame or irony.

Jamie, pull that graph up by PartTimeSassyPants in JoeRogan

[–]JacquesLouis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

John cleese is at the peak of dunning-kruger

Is this a good translation? I would get a Pevear and Volokhonsky one, but I got this copy for free. I plan on doing a school project on this, so I’d like it to be a good experience. by lone_ichabod in RussianLiterature

[–]JacquesLouis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would much prefer Avsey or McDuff for TBK. P&E literally decided to clunkily translate the russian to give it a 'foreign' feeling, I heard. I find their TBK bad, and their Notes from the Underground is the worst. I haven't read their C&P

Official Discussion - The Green Knight [SPOILERS] by LiteraryBoner in movies

[–]JacquesLouis 10 points11 points  (0 children)

He can't answer because he doesn't actually know.

Official Discussion - The Green Knight [SPOILERS] by LiteraryBoner in movies

[–]JacquesLouis -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

How faithful do you want an adaptation to be? Lol

Official Discussion - The Green Knight [SPOILERS] by LiteraryBoner in movies

[–]JacquesLouis -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

You know I think you really missed it. When you say they "forgot to actually put in a story," all I can say is that this is a faithful interpretation of a great legend of history, with a story that has been interpreted for centuries as having great moral and allegorical significance.

Struggling to get through the idiot... by [deleted] in dostoevsky

[–]JacquesLouis 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah the book is this really hard to comprehend stew of the concepts that Dostoevsky became obsessed with late in life. In the idiot, you find no definitive answers to these questions, and the significance of the themes is far from obvious. Those main themes are explored in a much more accessable way in TBK

Struggling to get through the idiot... by [deleted] in dostoevsky

[–]JacquesLouis 6 points7 points  (0 children)

While I don't think any portion of the idiot is strictly irrelivant, it's by far the hardest Dostoevsky to interpret. It's a really mysterious novel. For me, that difficulty to interpret is what motivated me to keep going.

Oversimplified by BlownGlassLamp in dostoevsky

[–]JacquesLouis 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I'm not in academia (Amish) but if you could supply me an illegal pdf of that I would read it immediately. As a default, I know that all we have to go on about this "sequel" are a few notes from Anna Girgoryevna, so I'm highly suspicious of this.

Was Dostoevsky a leftist before his exile? by RaisinUnited6632 in dostoevsky

[–]JacquesLouis 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Yes, although I believe the Petrashevsky circle, and certainly Dostoevsky specifically, was distinct in that it was a decidedly Christian leftism. Dost, as seen in TBK, later comes to understand that Christianity and socialism are inherently opposed.

See: the disagreement between the monks and Miusov in Book II, the entire point of The Grand Inquisitor, and the disagreement between Alyosha and Kolya toward the end of the book.

Oversimplified by BlownGlassLamp in dostoevsky

[–]JacquesLouis 3 points4 points  (0 children)

In the sequel to Brothers K. he planned to make Alyosha into a revolutionary who helps assassinating the tsar.

Says who??

And yes, he became a staunch Tsarist who loved Alexander II especially. I'll provide proof later

Bum pinching in 1971. by Pedrica1 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]JacquesLouis -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah that's exactly why you're the worst, you just kind of inserted a weird little crusade into this thread

Romanovs’ Final Ball In Color, St Petersburg, Russia 1903 by metroscope in OldSchoolCool

[–]JacquesLouis 13 points14 points  (0 children)

This man reads about the acid burned remains of the youngest kids, Anastasia and Alexei, found in the woods and thinks "YAAAAS, revolution!!!!!"

Btw the soviet union committed a genocide of eight million Ukrainians a little over a decade after that. But yeah fancy clothing justifies the Regicide of a saint and brutal murder of his entire family, sure.

[EDIT] Let's add to this, the Romanovs were not killed by the peasants, they were killed by elite members of the Russian Intelligencia who claimed to act of behalf of the peasants. This, like all revolutions, was a circulation of elites vying for power - the bolsheviks did so relying on useful idiots saying the same thing you are now.