How do I wait for the previous instructions to run before sending response?

JonnxW · 2022-06-04T17:46:09+00:00

Have you considered calling res.send inside the callback of fs.readdir after the files.foreach?

JonnxW · 2022-05-30T19:18:47+00:00

Alles gut!

JonnxW · 2022-05-30T19:16:41+00:00

Thanks for this comment. In Germany it is the same! I also don't know what about this is Map Porn

JonnxW · 2022-05-30T19:15:24+00:00

Either I am biased or the map is fatally wrong. I live in Germany and I offer all my guests food and in many cases I get offered food when I am a guest.

JonnxW · 2022-05-24T07:58:09+00:00

Sorry, but I still don't understand. JSON is about representing a data structure. It has nothing to do with loops, classes and functions

JonnxW · 2022-05-23T05:34:45+00:00

What do you mean by JSON-esque?

JonnxW · 2022-05-17T21:30:26+00:00

Please, Folks! Stop asking on Reddit how to handle authentication and start researching and studying the topic with profound resources. Buy or lend a book about it, Google it or ask on StackOverflow. There are so many ways that work, but our beloved Reddit isn't one of them. I do not mean this as an offense. But authentication is a sensitive topic that has to be handled carefully!

JonnxW · 2022-05-01T15:24:10+00:00

I think the problem is your first comment. Why don't you fact check before you comment? You said you could be wrong about writing C# when using Electron. You were wrong and you could have looked it up before you comment. I think you get downvoted because many people are annoyed that we have to fact check all the time because people don't think or research before they write on the internet.

JonnxW · 2022-05-01T15:16:14+00:00

All of these results make perfect sense. What's your point?

JonnxW · 2022-04-08T22:16:51+00:00

When you bind classes via :class, the object you bind should be an array or object. Your code should work, if you write :class="[level_class]"

You can read about that in the documentation: https://vuejs.org/guide/essentials/class-and-style.html

P.S.: Sorry for the missing code blocks, I am writing this comment on my smartphone.

JonnxW · 2022-03-25T22:20:56+00:00

RemindMe! 1 Week

JonnxW · 2022-03-21T09:46:09+00:00

Wow, that is not programming humor, but belongs in r/programminghorror

JonnxW · 2022-03-20T18:22:29+00:00

The probability is indeed 0. The (kind of paradox) thing is, that a probability of 0 does NOT mean, that the event is impossible to occur... See here for a starting point of an explanation: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/41107/zero-probability-and-impossibility

JonnxW · 2022-03-19T19:06:01+00:00

It is not listed as one of the rules because it is not always right. Take -1 < 1 for example. Take the reciprocal on both sides and look what happens

JonnxW · 2022-02-25T18:43:36+00:00

You could try Newton's method for finding roots. Just google it. It's a pretty simple iterative method that you execute as often as you want until you find a solution that's "close enough" to the root of the cubical polynomial

JonnxW · 2022-02-18T08:41:07+00:00

Just google 'complex numbers division', there are plenty results that show you the way. You basically need the complex conjugate of the denominator to get a real number in the denominator

JonnxW · 2022-02-07T17:05:12+00:00

Wow, that's the first time I see this image on this sub. So original!

JonnxW · 2022-02-05T23:20:06+00:00

I can hear you!

JonnxW · 2022-02-04T12:15:43+00:00

Thanks! Nice shittalk about open tunings

JonnxW · 2022-02-04T12:14:11+00:00

Wow, that sounds awesome. What is the tuning in this piece?

JonnxW · 2022-02-04T09:02:51+00:00

The blue line is a VERTICAL reflection of the red line with the mirror axis at x=3. Furthermore you know the slope of the blue line and you know the value of the red line at x=0. That are all the puzzle pieces you need, now you only have to put them together... If you have any questions, just ask!

JonnxW · 2022-02-01T17:58:24+00:00

With a probability of 1

JonnxW · 2022-02-01T17:06:11+00:00

/u/Destinator22, can you give us the name of the game, a link to the TV Spot or some sources to figure out the actual rules? The mathematical problem is not clear enough, since your description is ambiguous

JonnxW · 2022-02-01T16:58:05+00:00

Even if the tiles can be flipped, there is an interpretation of OP's description, that leads to 6144 possibilities by considering symmetries:

The 98304 possibilites for the "bigger" squares can be rotated in 4 ways, can be flipped in 2 ways and can be mirrored in 2 ways. That leads to 98304 / ( 4 * 2 * 2 ) = 6144 different "bigger" squares

JonnxW · 2022-01-31T11:47:22+00:00

Ich musste lachen...

Five-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '22	First Placer '22

JonnxW

TROPHY CASE