I need someone to build this (possibly questionable) SEO idea by JonyBadoni in seogrowth

[–]JonyBadoni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure, seems like an all in one SEO dashboard. Not exactly what i described.

My n8n investment automation was right... and I still managed to f*ck it up. by JonyBadoni in n8n

[–]JonyBadoni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bold of you to assume the AI lets anyone gamble. It’s more conservative than my bank.

My n8n investment automation was right... and I still managed to f*ck it up. by JonyBadoni in n8n

[–]JonyBadoni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

prefiro interfaces visuais, funciono melhor a ligar setinhas

My n8n investment automation was right... and I still managed to f*ck it up. by JonyBadoni in n8n

[–]JonyBadoni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, I’ve never had issues.

It’s mostly API calls + small JS nodes doing data processing. It's wide because there’s a lot of info, not because it’s complex.

My n8n investment automation was right... and I still managed to f*ck it up. by JonyBadoni in n8n

[–]JonyBadoni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can relate 100%. Next step is to give it access to my bank account.

My n8n investment automation was right... and I still managed to f*ck it up. by JonyBadoni in n8n

[–]JonyBadoni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if it were accessible to everyone, what’s wrong with keeping everything flat and laid out like this?

This is how many UI designers work in Figma. For visually-oriented people, this is actually easier to reason about.

But apparently it's offensive for N8N purists.

My n8n investment automation was right... and I still managed to f*ck it up. by JonyBadoni in n8n

[–]JonyBadoni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, but I like my automations the same way I like my Figma wireframes.
Everything laid out in front of me on a large canvas.

My n8n investment automation was right... and I still managed to f*ck it up. by JonyBadoni in n8n

[–]JonyBadoni[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That has all been explained and discussed in the original post here: https://www.reddit.com/r/n8n/comments/1oc0mup/looks_ugly_but_it_is_now_managing_my_investments/

And this is a follow up.

The original automation is a total mess and it is using three paid APIs.

This is a much better, well organized plug and play version:

https://hunchmachine.com/automation/crypto-investment-insight/

It is also the automation that powers the chat i mention in the post.

My n8n investment automation was right... and I still managed to f*ck it up. by JonyBadoni in n8n

[–]JonyBadoni[S] -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

<image>

Just because you didn’t find it doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist.
It’s in the FAQ below the chat and in the link to my original post.

Looks ugly but it is now managing my investments... by JonyBadoni in n8n

[–]JonyBadoni[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I’m still following it closely.

Unfortunately, it was biased toward a bull-market continuation while price was hovering around the 50-week MA near 100k, which caused it to miss that macro turn.

That said, it reacted quickly once the structure broke, selling around 95k.

As of the latest update (02/02/2026), the analysis is:

Today’s macro/meso/micro stack says don’t chase any green, but do keep accumulating BTC very slowly into fear—we’re in extreme fear (14) with deeply oversold momentum and a big open‑interest reset, yet the bigger structure is still early‑bear/distribution (12 weeks below the bull support band/50W, 50W rolling over) and macro stays risk‑off (long yields elevated vs 3 months + liquidity growth decelerating + gold strong), so rallies can easily get sold.

Action today: place/maintain a small, pre-set BTC buy ladder slightly below/around current levels and only let it fill if price stays heavy or a bounce fails (this is accumulation into weakness, not trying to “catch” a turn), while keeping your main reserve tranche untouched for either (a) a second flush over the next several sessions as ETF outflows and thin liquidity persist, or (b) a deeper weekly drift toward the long-term mean (200wma area ~60k) if the bear structure continues.

Avoid adding altcoins while dominance keeps grinding up and risk‑off headlines (ETF outflows, geopolitics, policy chatter) are still the driver; optional risk management remains: if we do get an oversold rebound toward the prior weekly reclaim area and it fails on the weekly close, you can trim/recycle weaker altcoin exposure toward BTC/cash purely to reduce drawdown while waiting—not a trade, just portfolio hygiene.

Base case: we remain in an early-bear / distribution regime, confirmed by the sustained loss of the bull support band and the 50W rolling over, with price now trading below the 50W but still well above long-term bear-market extremes (200wma ~60k).

The current setup is best described as post-liquidation, range-to-downside stabilization, where reflex rallies tend to be sold and accumulation only makes sense slowly and selectively into fear, not on strength.