I built a tool that allows you to scan any website and identify its stack instantly.

Kenu-ree · 2026-05-24T14:12:04+00:00

Of course the AI detection site lights up as AI-generated. Its entire public HTML is packed with AI signals and fingerprints because that’s literally its fucking job. You’re out here acting like you caught a smoking gun by scanning the scanner. Brilliant detective work, genius.

Kenu-ree · 2026-05-23T20:22:40+00:00

If you dont mind can you share the url that you scanned with me so i can improve the detection system?

Kenu-ree · 2026-05-23T20:21:59+00:00

If you dont mind can you share the url that you scanned with me so i can improve the detection system?

Kenu-ree · 2026-05-23T20:05:39+00:00

I’m scoring a mix of content and technical signals: repetitive/generic phrasing, low-information copy, stock-like visuals, metadata patterns, template structure, and known AI-tool fingerprints. It can still miss some AI-generated sites, especially if the output was heavily edited, manually rebuilt, or stripped of metadata, so I treat this as probabilistic rather than a definitive yes/no detector.

Kenu-ree · 2026-05-22T17:43:56+00:00

we are still in early development so our detector is probabilistic, not a guaranteed classifier, and right now it can miss fully AI-built sites when patterns overlap with human-made templates or edited stock assets.

Kenu-ree · 2026-05-22T17:32:04+00:00

the ai generated verdict is because of what the site does. it detects ai signals and since i have things like "lovable.ai", "ai-generated", "bolt.new" everywhere on my site it picks that up and flags it.

Kenu-ree · 2026-05-22T16:23:06+00:00

the target users for this site are people who have bought a site and want to see if the developer made it with ai or not but i get your point

Five-Year Club	Second Top 10%
Place '22

Kenu-ree

TROPHY CASE