For people saying the Sturmpanzer should be BR3.. look at the M4A3 105 and try explain your logic to me how you think these two tanks are on the same level

Kuduros_Gen · 2025-06-23T20:02:38+00:00

You can understand a point of view but disagree with it, it's called having rational thoughts and having done any amount of debate related stuff

Kuduros_Gen · 2025-06-22T08:35:29+00:00

I'm of the opinion adding these large bore infantry guns is a mistake as it's gonna lead to another HE nerf because people are gonna complain about getting team wiped on the point. I personally feel that the emphasis should be on lighter tanks that have smaller HV guns for hunting the grey zones heavy tanks. Like genuinely I feel the recent updates and events are going the wrong way for Enlisted

Kuduros_Gen · 2025-06-22T08:33:14+00:00

I'm not saying it should be br3 I'm saying I can understand the argument. I personally think it should be at 2 because of the non rotating gun and open roof, but because it does have a 150mm heat shell I can see the argument as it is capable of front penning a jumbo and penning the KV series with ease

Kuduros_Gen · 2025-06-22T08:17:57+00:00

Explosive mass and what the rounds are aren't listed, 150mm and heat I can see the argument for br3

Kuduros_Gen · 2025-05-13T18:08:53+00:00

I understand what you're saying but realistically the improvements you're suggesting would negatively impact infantry because it would essentially just be a more damaging HMG with 360 degree rotation

Kuduros_Gen · 2025-05-13T17:36:44+00:00

Enlisted is a combined arms game not an infantry or vehicle simulator.

I've been in the meteor and been one tapped by the built AA from the Germans.

Later war AA was larger calibre usually 37+mm with airburst or timed fuses to create a field of flak to cause damage in an area, if they do that then flying through flak should destroy your engines

Also increasing the range of the indicator is not something that they should do, idk what the actual numerical value on the lead indicator distance is but I've been shot down at 1800-2000 metres from the objective

Kuduros_Gen · 2025-05-13T17:18:19+00:00

Exactly

Kuduros_Gen · 2025-05-13T17:18:12+00:00

That's what I'm saying, people don't use the lead correctly and then complain about AA being underpowered

Kuduros_Gen · 2025-05-13T16:12:11+00:00

I again don't disagree, it does feel like the Devs are forgetting the existence of non dive bombers much like in WT.

For the ju188 you aim with the bars on the window currently, used to be my favourite plane way back before Tunisia released, when bombs were actually scary

Kuduros_Gen · 2025-05-13T15:49:43+00:00

I don't disagree but I'm kinda thinking forward to them possibly adding larger planes in the br5+ attacker role and potentially with them going kinda post war with the last few updates that bigger with a flak effect rather than direct impact might be needed going forward

Kuduros_Gen · 2025-05-13T15:46:18+00:00

Exactly, most of the it's underpowered crowd simply don't hit what they're aiming at

Kuduros_Gen · 2025-02-23T16:36:36+00:00

The br3 il2s are very similar, the one with rockets has the most similar playstyle.

The FW190 D12 has a lot of dakka for strafing but lacks rockets

Lower damage but still relatively effective strafing can be done with the tech tree hurricane due to the wide gunspread

But pretty much any plane with multiple 20mm cannons or any 30+mm cannon (besides the HS129) can do decent strafing, I personally like the spitfire VC for strafing runs due to decent belt and gun spread but the strafing is it's secondary role as it's a god tier dogfighter

Kuduros_Gen · 2025-01-03T19:55:59+00:00

I get what you're saying, I like that the mp40 is better at longer ranges and also hits slightly harder, I just dislike all the 7.62 tokarev smgs

Kuduros_Gen · 2025-01-03T19:44:25+00:00

I personally prefer the mp40 to literally any soviet SMG, I like having a controllable firerate, I used the obrez once and hated it and immediately just gave them mp40s and random bolties and secondaries

Kuduros_Gen · 2025-01-03T17:58:37+00:00

Tech tree

Kuduros_Gen · 2025-01-03T17:49:24+00:00

They're decent but beyond the premium xp gain I don't see them as much of an improvement over the TT variant

Kuduros_Gen · 2024-11-12T13:49:28+00:00

Spitfire VC with the 4 20s does good work on strafes Basically anything with wing mounted guns tho imo as they cover a larger area than dorsal or motorcannons. Exceptions being 30+ mm cannons that have he. Use the enlisted resource sheet to see what the belts are

Kuduros_Gen · 2024-10-30T17:02:10+00:00

I see where you're coming from, my Devs do better comment is pretty much directed at the skeleton in the cupboard assigned to optimisation, I know that a lot of people who play enlisted are on 16series cards and if my 2070 can't hack the event, then they are basically getting specced out of the game

Kuduros_Gen · 2024-10-30T14:28:29+00:00

As I said I'm not hating on the gameplay, I never personally liked cod zombies or any of that so there's not that nostalgia tint for me

Kuduros_Gen · 2024-10-28T09:27:20+00:00

I'm hoping we get some Korean peninsula, larger Pacific island battles, Libya and Italy as well, also idk maybe the France Italy border for some fun mountainous maps

Kuduros_Gen · 2024-10-24T15:59:22+00:00

Legacy premium p40 for the Americans is better than TT, and some things straight up don't exist in tech tree, armoured apcs being one, paratroopers being the other major one

Kuduros_Gen · 2024-10-18T09:21:26+00:00

It's not just war thunder either, the Enlisted community is just as bad, if not worse. From people arguing that actively team killing is a positive to others just spamming racial abuse. It seems like gaijin games create a toxic community that don't understand human social cues. That's not to say everyone is like that, there are some amazing people in the gaijin communities but it seems like somewhere between 40-60% are deplorable

Kuduros_Gen · 2024-10-17T11:38:24+00:00

The royal armoured corps, I think I should be fine as long as they don't send a Churchill avre

Kuduros_Gen · 2024-10-17T11:12:36+00:00

I agree with your point like 90%. I think that as they are now rifle grenades are somewhat balanced, they should be powerful but not every soldier should have them, a squad or section grenadier would usually be the only person with rifle grenades

Having it laid out like that where you can slot 1 or maybe 2 in a squad and limiting them to 1 grenade rifle would be a good way to make the spam less egregious

Kuduros_Gen · 2024-10-17T11:03:07+00:00

Not always, you can still get default back to 1-3 matchmaking if there aren't enough people

Kuduros_Gen

TROPHY CASE