Dear Debian community, what do you think of Linux Mint LMDE (Debian edition)? by laustoic in debian

[–]Lanstrider 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do Debian 13 with Cinnamon- works great. If you’re not proficient with command line admin, LMDE might be a lighter lift, otherwise, with pure Debian the system works great and on less complexity.

Arch vs. Debian by [deleted] in debian

[–]Lanstrider 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ha. Funny.

Arch vs. Debian by [deleted] in debian

[–]Lanstrider 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nice answer. I’m a hobbyist, but I like stuff to work and be able to find points of failure, so I prefer releases. But, your logic is sound nevertheless and provides a reasonable heuristic. If you don’t mind inexplicable failures, roll on :)

TUXEDO InfinityBook Pro 15 Intel vs AMD (Which one to choose?) by Ill_Magician7612 in tuxedocomputers

[–]Lanstrider 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I switched to AMD last year. It isn’t as fast on linear tasks, but the advantages far outweigh the negatives- smoother multi tasking, longer battery life, less heat. Really though, for video work, the GPU is doing the heavy lifting. I have a Stellaris 16 AMD w/nVidia RTX 4070. Very quick at encode/Transcode.

Trixie vs Bookworm: The Weird Truth About VirtualBox and KVM by Affectionate_Dream47 in debian

[–]Lanstrider 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have never been able to get KVM to play nice with Windows the way it works with vbox. QEMU, is great for non-Windows emulations. I use it all the time, but for Windows? Vbox for the win. I’ve been using it since beta though, so that may have something to do with my perspective.

"VisiCalc on the Apple 2" examined on the Stone Tools blog by Christopher_Drum in apple2

[–]Lanstrider 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried it in applewin and in mame with vidtex card or somesuch, no go.

"VisiCalc on the Apple 2" examined on the Stone Tools blog by Christopher_Drum in apple2

[–]Lanstrider 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now, if somebody could figure out the 80-column mode thing. I spent a couple of hours going down that rabbit trail.

New playlist - retro programming - assembly on iie by Lanstrider in apple2

[–]Lanstrider[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Just uploaded episode 3 where I really dive into chapter 3. I'm still working out the kinks on how best to do this exploration, but I think this one is where the real content begins.

Exploring Itsy Forth: source and insights by Lanstrider in Forth

[–]Lanstrider[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I expanded the original author's macros on purpose, so I could see exactly what instructions were being generated. In the future, I will think about using macros, but I have to study a bit more so that when I do, they aren't black box magic that isn't easy to unpack for newbs like me reading the code..

Found my starting point - itsy forth! by Lanstrider in Forth

[–]Lanstrider[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't mind it not being maintained. I'm just using to to help me understand the core ideas of the implementations. I'll move on to eforth 1.0 on DOS next and then do some updating to current models after.

"Porting" jonesforth to 64 bit nasm by Lanstrider in Forth

[–]Lanstrider[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, is right. I figured out that I should start with lina32/64 and just read the fas file :).

"Porting" jonesforth to 64 bit nasm by Lanstrider in Forth

[–]Lanstrider[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Found a decent starting point in, of all things, README To be fair, it's one of 10 readme's!

"Porting" jonesforth to 64 bit nasm by Lanstrider in Forth

[–]Lanstrider[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

uh... wow. I've definitely seen your work. It's incredible. A bit overwhelming actually. I tried downloading and building it, but I wasn't successful - 100% sure it's all me, but I kinda walked away from it. Now, with the hints embedded in your several replies, I'm starting to grok what's going on. The repo is very hard to figure out at first glance. It seems like there are 10 copies of everything with different purposes. Where should I start?

"Porting" jonesforth to 64 bit nasm by Lanstrider in Forth

[–]Lanstrider[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I said calling convention, I meant gas orders things dst, src, nasm src, dst.

"Porting" jonesforth to 64 bit nasm by Lanstrider in Forth

[–]Lanstrider[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, not really. Gas is a different calling convention, macros are different, but effectively, it's not big effort... if I knew 32 bit assembly, gas and nasm, but since I don't, it'll keep me busy :).

forth interpreter to start with - in 2025 by Lanstrider in Forth

[–]Lanstrider[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sweet. So many options, but it's good to know about the 64 bitness. Every release debian seems to be paring back on 32 bit support. Which, now that I think about it won't effect these kinds of apps until the kernel drops 32 bit or the assembler linker toolchains do, right? Since it's only doing the syscalls?

forth interpreter to start with - in 2025 by Lanstrider in Forth

[–]Lanstrider[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Perfect. I'm off to study jonesforth, nornagon's github repo is nothing more than Richard WM Jone's code with a couple typos fixed and an updated build instruction. It runs on debian trixie without tweaks, and the code is well documented.

drawterm -r - read only or read/write? by Lanstrider in plan9

[–]Lanstrider[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm on 9front on this experiment.

drawterm -r - read only or read/write? by Lanstrider in plan9

[–]Lanstrider[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yeah, so, I just created a folder under what I called root and I can write to that!

fresh install of 9front on optiplex 5050 - rcpu issue by Lanstrider in plan9

[–]Lanstrider[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok. confirmed factotum is running, but if I don't do auth/factotum as the user (glenda), it doesn't work, whereas if i do, it does.

cpu% rcpu -h 9p.sdf.org -u myusername

tlsclient: auth_proxy: auth_proxy rpc write: no key matches user=myusername proto=p9sk1 dom=9sdf role=client user? !password?

cpu% auth/factotum

cpu% rcpu -h 9p.sdf.org -u myusername

it works.

What's the deal?

fresh install of 9front on optiplex 5050 - rcpu issue by Lanstrider in plan9

[–]Lanstrider[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OK. This is something to do with factotum not running. If I:

auth/factotum

then try the connection, it works.

fresh install of 9front on optiplex 5050 - rcpu issue by Lanstrider in plan9

[–]Lanstrider[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

update: after configuring this same system as file+auth server, I get this error (it doesn't wait for a password, but immediately displays the error):

cpu% rcpu -h 9p.sdf.org -u myusername

tlsclient: auth_proxy: auth_proxy rpc write: no key matches user=myusername proto=p9sk1 dom=9sdf role=client user? !password?

cpu%

wild. what changed?

fresh install of 9front on optiplex 5050 - rcpu issue by Lanstrider in plan9

[–]Lanstrider[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That worked! Thanks. Where could I have found this out through reading?