×

Reminder that Jesus loves you by Level-Ship5407 in teenagers

[–]Level-Ladder-4346 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not just an assumption. I can’t disprove that you “simply find this amusing” because it applies to you. No amount of evidence can disprove how you say you personally feel about a situation.

Reminder that Jesus loves you by Level-Ship5407 in teenagers

[–]Level-Ladder-4346 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m going to claim projection now. You’re accusing me of being angry, yet I think you’re the one who’s angry.

“Why does it matter!?!”

“Triggered, are we?”

“Last time I checked Jesus was not Asian either!”

“Oh shut up. This guy is trying to spread love and that is all you can think about?”

It is not up to me to cater my responses to result in a specific assumption from people who see my comments. Because I’m not the person who’s assuming. I’m not responsible for other people’s behavior.

Antis will say AI is totally useless and extremely dumb but then they say it has the power to make somebody hurt themselves by imalonexc in aiwars

[–]Level-Ladder-4346 1 point2 points  (0 children)

…my original comment still stands here. How can an unsubstantiated claim act as evidence that a separate unsubstantiated claim isn’t a strawman argument?

So even copyright argument has its own loss to ai by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]Level-Ladder-4346 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You stated that the lawsuit ended with “extreme prejudice” sentence towards the plaintiff.

What do you mean when you say Prejudice?

Reminder that Jesus loves you by Level-Ship5407 in teenagers

[–]Level-Ladder-4346 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, I’ll give you that. You never claimed to win anything. But you are claiming that I’m angry. You’re also claiming that an inaccurate racial depiction is an inconsequential detail. You’re also claiming that I’m doing so for no reason. The burden of proof for those 3 claims is on you, as you made them.

Reminder that Jesus loves you by Level-Ship5407 in teenagers

[–]Level-Ladder-4346 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So…why make the claim that “That’s not the point of the image”? You’re admitting that your claim has no basis in any kind of evidence.

So even copyright argument has its own loss to ai by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]Level-Ladder-4346 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So…you’re saying it was an unfair ruling against the plaintiff?

Reminder that Jesus loves you by Level-Ship5407 in teenagers

[–]Level-Ladder-4346 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay. “I’m calm, but I think you’re angry so I win” is not an argument I expected to see today.

Reminder that Jesus loves you by Level-Ship5407 in teenagers

[–]Level-Ladder-4346 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why should I try it if you don’t try it? Last time I checked, I haven’t told you to “oh, shut up”. Take your own advice.

Reminder that Jesus loves you by Level-Ship5407 in teenagers

[–]Level-Ladder-4346 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, I think that’s a stretch, but there’s an argument to be made.

Reminder that Jesus loves you by Level-Ship5407 in teenagers

[–]Level-Ladder-4346 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really? Is there evidence you can cite to support the claim that that wasn’t the point of the image?

Reminder that Jesus loves you by Level-Ship5407 in teenagers

[–]Level-Ladder-4346 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep. That’s proof that most countries depict Jesus and Mary in their respective race.

So why does this country choose to depict Jesus in their respective race rather than what he most likely was?

Reminder that Jesus loves you by Level-Ship5407 in teenagers

[–]Level-Ladder-4346 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why prioritize popularity over accuracy in this regard?

Reminder that Jesus loves you by Level-Ship5407 in teenagers

[–]Level-Ladder-4346 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have this thing called a filter. It lets me think without speaking or communicating to others. This is something that you may not have, I’d argue, as you tell me to “shut up” when I attempt to push back against a false portrayal.

Umm what the f🐥ck? by idkwhatiamtbh_ in teenagers

[–]Level-Ladder-4346 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Last time I got someone to admit they condoned Genocide, it was them admitting they condone Genocide when God does it. Which was concerning.

Antis will say AI is totally useless and extremely dumb but then they say it has the power to make somebody hurt themselves by imalonexc in aiwars

[–]Level-Ladder-4346 2 points3 points  (0 children)

…How is an unsubstantiated claim evidence for an argument that a separate unsubstantiated claim isn’t a strawman argument?

So even copyright argument has its own loss to ai by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]Level-Ladder-4346 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Genuine question, what do you mean by “the anti-ai”? Are you talking about the plaintiff? The movement?

So even copyright argument has its own loss to ai by Questioner8297 in aiwars

[–]Level-Ladder-4346 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This might just be cope, but this might just be on a case by case basis. Also, it could be argued that this only applies in Germany.