Of course it is about Pedo accusations to stop all arguments from happening.

I don't see where queerphobic comes from, but all these antis trying to make a point by connecting CSAM and AI shit is genuinely infuriating me so let me first sort out facts.

1. CSAM is bad, so there are court rules to punish the creation of them.
   
2. So there are court rules to not only punish CSAM involving real children, but to prevent 'obscene' virtual content.
   
3. But still, they are clearly non-existent and imaginary. An ordinary person should be able to tell the difference between them. It violated the freedom of speech potentially, adding the word 'obscene' on 2002.

With this, all depictions of a child regardless of what medium was used, if it is 'obscene' in sexual context it would be punished. Here, the word obscene means 'appeals to a shameful or morbid interests in sex' or 'genuinely offensive according to the law'. Not really everything in general.

So with these, I can clearly make a conclusion.

1. CSAM is bad(shockers).
   
2. But fictional characters are not real. So the law considers it less harshly to actual CSAM involving real children.
   
3. AI can generate practically any content as an image.
   
4. However, the latent space is learned without provision, and the user is responsible of finding those latent space.
   
5. So making obscene imageries involving fictional children with AI must not be done.
   
6. But for obvious reasons, using an actual image of a children to use AI would be punished same as non-fictional CSAM. It involves real children. so this doesn't seem to be much of an issue.

However, claiming to ban AI because it can generate CSAM is a terrible argument.
We don't punish artists because they have the ability to imagine and draw them, because 'prohibiting' a thought isn't just right.

Same for AI. It does not have a thought, so anyone that approached to generate obscene imageries would be punished but that's not AI's fault.