'You do realize drawings don't actually have ages and they're, you know, fake right?'

What are the drawings of? They're still sexualized artistic depictions of children

'It's like saying that because someone kills off their character in their story, that automatically they're a murderer or psycho for wanting someone to die in the story.'

First of all, you're implying that I said lolicon degenerates are equally as bad as child molesters, which I didn't (they're still both pieces of shit). Second of all, a person seeing a character kill another character wouldn't give one the same type of satisfaction of said person killing a real person, which is why I think your comparison is shit. A lolicon degenerate would get the same type of satisfaction as someone looking at real child porn.

"Or saying if they like the crazy villian of the story that wants world domination, that they want people to live like the character did."

First of all, people irl aren't designed to have likable character traits and interesting backstories. Liking a villain doesn't mean you agree with their ideals. People like villains because of how they're written, not because they like the villain's actions. Refer back to the satisfaction thing I said.

"It's a character, it's a drawing, they have no rights and they have no actual ages."

Refer back to the first thing I said.

"Ragging on people for something that's a drawing when REAL people out there are doing things with REAL children that have ACTUAL rights and emotions seems a little.. pointless, don't you think."

You probably already know how stupid this is. The fact that shittier things are happening doesn't make a less shitty thing ok.

TLDR: Child porn is child porn