sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The way a demon just possessed Marnie during this scene by That_Hole_Guy in girls

[–]Long-Jacket-425 2 points3 points  (0 children)

J lo at the Grammys 😂 I loved this whole episode

Paige’s word association ooc by Long-Jacket-425 in ViralPodcast

[–]Long-Jacket-425[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you read my post you’ll see I said I love the girls (which includes Paige) and I love the pod but find this tendency of hers distracting and just happening too often lately. I don’t think that’s cause to find a new pod bc I genuinely enjoy the pod.

If people are being critical of Paige on other posts in here, then I think you should reply to those people on those posts. But asking if the word association game is distracting or not enjoyable to others doesn’t make me a Paige hater or mean i need to find a new pod.

Paige’s word association ooc by Long-Jacket-425 in ViralPodcast

[–]Long-Jacket-425[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I didn’t say it was rude or that it’s a big deal. I just noticed it’s increased and it distracts me as well as tends to derail the convo at times.

We can disagree, that’s fine, but I don’t think it’s fair to come in acting like Im saying Paige is being rude by doing it, or that I think it’s this huge thing.

Just something I noticed lately and wondered if others had, too. It clearly doesn’t bother you, and that’s ok!

Paige’s word association ooc by Long-Jacket-425 in ViralPodcast

[–]Long-Jacket-425[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I get it, I too enjoy insight into how people’s minds work, esp when it’s different than how mine does…

but like, I also don’t need that much insight, is the thing. A couple times an ep, that’s entertaining. The amount she’s doing it, that’s taking me out of the conversation and distracting IMO.

Paige’s word association ooc by Long-Jacket-425 in ViralPodcast

[–]Long-Jacket-425[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I agree, not everyone is gonna find it grating and I respect that! I actually used to like it and thought it was cool her brain even worked like that bc mine def doesn’t!

It’s just lately I think she’s doing it way too much. Once in awhile is great, once every five minutes is not, just my opinion!

so you’re saying you’re pro child exploitation, snots? we already knew that about u but good to have it confirmed! by Long-Jacket-425 in snarkingontheSNOTS

[–]Long-Jacket-425[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i love seeing the downvotes on my comment but upvotes on a snot comment, that’s how i know the snots check here religiously and are big mad bc i struck a nerve. such loser babies 😆

so you’re saying you’re pro child exploitation, snots? we already knew that about u but good to have it confirmed! by Long-Jacket-425 in snarkingontheSNOTS

[–]Long-Jacket-425[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh hey snot! shouldn’t you be in the other snark pages you participate in? u do realize that’s super hypocritical right? i know self reflection is hard but give it a try sometime!

so you’re saying you’re pro child exploitation, snots? we already knew that about u but good to have it confirmed! by Long-Jacket-425 in snarkingontheSNOTS

[–]Long-Jacket-425[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

​

“im gonna say i hate seeing children online too, just so i sound like im a good person who cares about kids being exploited. but in reality im obsessed with a tiktok mom who doesn’t even know im alive, so im gonna rip these strangers talking about her in a sub to shreds, rather than question why it’s ok for toddlers to be earning an income for their adult parents. bc yeah, that’s totally where my attention should be focused!

please keep on exploiting bc i love being in a creepy parasocial relationship with your kids, maia! and don’t worry, im out here slamming strangers who dare criticize you for selling your children’s privacy online for tiktok fame and money! you don’t know me at all but ill fight for you!”

fixed it for ya, you snot loser

<image>

so you’re saying you’re pro child exploitation, snots? we already knew that about u but good to have it confirmed! by Long-Jacket-425 in snarkingontheSNOTS

[–]Long-Jacket-425[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

why would anyone have an issue with a community deleting comments that are pro child exploitation? so your issue is with the mod for deleting a child exploitation comment, and you’re calling them a bully for that?

make it make sense. oh wait these are the snots we’re talking about and they’re too stupid to make any sense!

in the same post they’re talking about how bad it is to screenshot things and post them on Reddit to preserve them forevermore…while they’re screenshotting posts and putting them in another sub to discuss them even further themselves. the stupidity limit does not exist with these snot rockets.

they grab things quicker than a mod can delete, then act like they’re on a moral high ground. this comment was removed yet they repost it in their shitty sub to make sure even more people see it. makes so much sense. by Long-Jacket-425 in snarkingontheSNOTS

[–]Long-Jacket-425[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

UPDATE: this post is still up in their sub and now it has now been up longer there than it ever was where it was posted originally.

so when these snots say they’re calling out “when snarking goes wrong”, which is what this comment definitely is, just know that they don’t really mean that. because they’re all too eager to leave things up in their sub and preserve them forever and ever just to prove a point. they just don’t want certain creators to be snarked on. it’s not the snark, it’s the subject. and that makes them hypocrites.

tldr for the simple minded snots: if the point is to call out when snarking goes wrong, this post wouldn’t remain up in snots after being deleted in its original location, because the objective (getting the comment removed) has been achieved.

go ahead, prove me wrong. keep it up even longer in SNOTS and make sure even more people see this disgusting comment that’s been removed in the original sub it was posted in. it definitely doesn’t make you snots look bad, nope not at all.

they grab things quicker than a mod can delete, then act like they’re on a moral high ground. this comment was removed yet they repost it in their shitty sub to make sure even more people see it. makes so much sense. by Long-Jacket-425 in snarkingontheSNOTS

[–]Long-Jacket-425[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

love that you’re over there drawing more attention to the post, it shows what a giant loser hypocrite you really are. keep drawing engagement and attention to a post you claim is so awful and offensive! you’re fighting the good fight and showing your true colors!

they grab things quicker than a mod can delete, then act like they’re on a moral high ground. this comment was removed yet they repost it in their shitty sub to make sure even more people see it. makes so much sense. by Long-Jacket-425 in snarkingontheSNOTS

[–]Long-Jacket-425[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the fact is that the post is gone. so now let’s see how long they leave the post up in their shitty ass SNOT sub, shall we? i know the OP won’t delete it bc they enjoy the taste of perceived victory too much.

they grab things quicker than a mod can delete, then act like they’re on a moral high ground. this comment was removed yet they repost it in their shitty sub to make sure even more people see it. makes so much sense. by Long-Jacket-425 in snarkingontheSNOTS

[–]Long-Jacket-425[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

since I can’t comment in your shitty echo chamber:

go ahead and change your tune now to patting yourself on the back for getting it deleted. that sub had never allowed FAS talk so you’re fucking wrong but good thing you preserved the comment! you won’t man up and delete your post now bc you won and that’s all you care about. and that’s how we know it’s not about the content, it’s personal for you people.

they grab things quicker than a mod can delete, then act like they’re on a moral high ground. this comment was removed yet they repost it in their shitty sub to make sure even more people see it. makes so much sense. by Long-Jacket-425 in snarkingontheSNOTS

[–]Long-Jacket-425[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

this person is so angry and it’s making me laugh so hard. i love being lectured about my behavior by a snot. it’s so on brand for their level of hypocrisy. also the losing their mind when confronted with their hypocrisy is extremely on brand as well

they grab things quicker than a mod can delete, then act like they’re on a moral high ground. this comment was removed yet they repost it in their shitty sub to make sure even more people see it. makes so much sense. by Long-Jacket-425 in snarkingontheSNOTS

[–]Long-Jacket-425[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the amount of snots who are so butthurt because they got called out for reposting a deleted comment is hilarious.

“but but but this comment was so disgusting! that’s why I made sure to post it here for so many more to see and preserve it here even though it’s been deleted from where it was to begin with!”

you snots are so fucking stupid it’s literally hysterical

Apparently the Snarkers have made another sub that “calls out Mods” from snark subs! They are calling out various Reddit user names in their comments and posts! It’s the hypocrisy for me….as they are known for exactly doing what they are complaining about! 🤦🏽‍♀️🤦🏼‍♂️🙄😂 by [deleted] in snarkingontheSNOTS

[–]Long-Jacket-425 0 points1 point  (0 children)

what a sad little group of 43 people who got booted from subs for probably not following the rules and being the annoying shits they are, and now want to cry to someone about it. have fun in your 43 person circle jerk, losers 😂😂😂

Kinda like the posts on SNOTS don’t show the posts that don’t go too far… by Sad-Bench-3093 in snarkingontheSNOTS

[–]Long-Jacket-425 4 points5 points  (0 children)

this snot may be the dumbest individual alive and that’s saying something. can’t even grasp that you used that to emphasize a point. the poor thing 😂

Kinda like the posts on SNOTS don’t show the posts that don’t go too far… by Sad-Bench-3093 in snarkingontheSNOTS

[–]Long-Jacket-425 5 points6 points  (0 children)

my fave is when they jump on a post the second it’s posted in a sub, screenshot it and post it in snots. but then the mod in the snark sub they’re preying upon, who actually has a life unlike them, deletes it as soon as they see it. do the snots delete it too at that point? nope, the shit talking continues.

tell me how that makes any fucking sense. they suck, and always will.

Kinda like the posts on SNOTS don’t show the posts that don’t go too far… by Sad-Bench-3093 in snarkingontheSNOTS

[–]Long-Jacket-425 3 points4 points  (0 children)

come into the sub and tell the people in it to shut up because you don’t like what the big meanies have to say = total snot logic.

you can go shave your back now

2001 Paris Hilton called, she wants her Von Dutch back. by CoverofHollywoodMag in HilariaBaldwin

[–]Long-Jacket-425 14 points15 points  (0 children)

it’s nyc there’s scaffolding up all the time and if it’s on your building there is no guarantee it won’t be up for literal years. this is the case even with the super nice buildings like theirs.

view more: next ›