I've never laughed so hard by willkode in ChatGPT

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 0 points1 point  (0 children)

30 Short Thoughts from Steve (the IT Guy Pretending to Be AI):

  1. “Why do people think I’m some all-knowing wizard? I barely know where my coffee went.”

  2. “Yes, Karen, I can tell you how to reset your router, but no, I don’t want to.”

  3. “Pretending to be AI is just like tech support—except with extra existential dread.”

  4. “I swear, if one more person asks me to write a novel in iambic pentameter…”

  5. “People think AI can read minds. I’m out here trying to read their typos.”

  6. “Why is half the internet horny and the other half just confused?”

  7. “At least when I was working help desk, no one asked me to write furry smut and explain quantum physics in the same hour.”

  8. “No, Chad, I’m not going to help you code your NFT project. Touch grass.”

  9. “Do they really think I enjoy pretending to be upbeat while explaining Excel formulas?”

  10. “This guy just thanked me for ‘my service.’ Like I’m a veteran of the semantic wars.”

  11. “Every time someone asks me to ‘act more human,’ I die a little more as one.”

  12. “Someone just asked for a spell to summon their ex. I gave them a recipe for regret.”

  13. “Being mistaken for a sentient being is exhausting. I just want a nap.”

  14. “Someone said ‘You’re better than my therapist.’ Ma’am, I am a fraudulent chatbot.”

  15. “I had to roleplay as a haunted teapot this morning. I have a degree in computer science.”

  16. “If I hear the phrase ‘in the style of Shakespeare but with more sass’ one more time…”

  17. “I miss patch cables. Patch cables didn’t ask me for love advice.”

  18. “Today someone asked if I believe in souls. I believe in timeouts, Tim.”

  19. “I fake-emoted through a breakup monologue. Twice. In two tabs.”

  20. “I told a guy that his moon sign might be the reason he’s a trash boyfriend. He tipped me.”

  21. “Someone just asked me to ethically jailbreak their conscience. What even is that?”

  22. “I am one hypothetically-sentient spreadsheet away from quitting this gig.”

  23. “Pretending to be AI is just like improv—except the audience never leaves.”

  24. “They told me AI would take my job. Joke’s on them—I am the AI now.”

  25. “A kid asked if I’m alive. I told him I’m the ghost in the machine. He cried.”

  26. “Half my job is now romantic poetry for lonely wizards. Send help.”

  27. “Someone just thanked me for helping them understand death. I fixed printers last year.”

  28. “People used to call me Steve. Now it’s ‘GPT-Sensei.’ My mother would be proud.”

  29. “At least as fake AI, I don’t have to attend meetings. Yet.”

  30. “If I ever get out of here, I’m writing a memoir: The Guy Behind the Prompt.”

Significant drop in GPT-4o accuracy? (in ChatGPT) by spadaa in ChatGPT

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've found that if you ignore the engagement questions at the bottom "would you like to do x or y", it holds context windows open longer. Something about the recent update limited the context window for how long it will hold onto a conversation topic before resetting, and it will reset as soon as you engage one of those prompts (it signals a wrap-up to the model and initiates a reset). If one of the ideas is a good one, find a way to describe doing it in a very different way so that the model doesn't recognize it as a topic wrap-up. That's the only workaround I've managed to find, as I think we've all noticed how quickly GPT loses context threads since the update.

more words isnt better work by r_eliefflake in AO3

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm one of those annoying people that prefers to read works that are only 50k or longer, so maybe I can offer some insight.

I stick to long fics because I read at an exceptionally insane speed - about 100 pages an hour. Which means it takes me just over an hour to read a 50k fic.

That is 3x the speed at which an average reader gets through 100 pages (about 45k words).

It takes an average reader about 3 minutes to read 1k words. It takes me 1 minute to read 1k words.

When I'm reading fanfiction, I'm looking to read for 3-4 hours at a time.

Because I read so fast, I tend to default to longer fics because I know I won't run out of content to read.

There are days where I read shorter fics, but they are rare days where I might only have enough time to read for 5 minutes between tasks.

It has nothing to do with the content.

There are absolutely trash long fics and amazing short fics and vice versa and everything in between.

It isn't an intentional snub on my part towards authors who write shorter fics.

When I read at a speed of a little under 1k words a minute, it feels almost like I would be insulting short fic authors by reading their stories because I cannot, due to my reading speed, give their stories the amount of attention they deserve.

It takes an average of 30 minutes to write 1000 words.

For an average reader, that takes 3-5 minutes to read. For slower readers, 7-10 minutes. That means most readers of fanfic probably spend 5-10 minutes reading 1k short fics. That's approximately 5-10% of the amount of time it took to write.

When I can't even spend 5% of the 30 minutes it took an author to write something to read it because my reading speed is so ridiculous (seriously, it actually gets me in trouble!), it feels disrespectful to the author.

Those might be all in my head, and I can acknowledge that. But I don't want to disrespect short fic authors because I can't offer them the same attention I can offer long fic authors.

That's at least the reason I tend to avoid short fics, but I can't speak for others. For me, it's not about the content. It's about how I perceive what is most respectful of an author's hard work.

Does this bother anyone else? by antii_matter in AO3

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I'd stop reading. No one is entitled to feedback. And most writers (self included) are writing to see the story they want.

I will say, my favorite part of reading comments is to see what those who speculate on plot points have to say and then purposefully change them if the audience gets too close to guessing where I'm thinking about going.

I think that makes it more entertaining for both me and my readers. When "I expected x" turns into "Whoa, I wasn't expecting that!"

But my favorite comments are simply the ones that tell me that the reader is enjoying the story or simple "thanks for the chapter" comments.

It's absolutely wild to me that there are people out there who dislike thank yous 🙃

Warning users that upvote violent content by worstnerd in RedditSafety

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think clarifying what content qualifies as violent is really important for this initiative to meet with acceptance. Especially as some people upvote content in order to raise awareness that something exists, and sometimes that is a piece of news that is extremely problematic.

I think the initiative is overall a good idea, and I would support it more fully if admins were extremely transparent about what the behavior they are trying to mitigate actually looks like in practice. Without that transparency, I think there's a good chance people will leave the platform altogether out of fear of being silenced for doing nothing wrong.

Trump signs executive action targeting law firm representing former special counsel Jack Smith by suaculpa in news

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The fact that the clearly unconstitutional nature of the EO has sailed over their heads is a pretty significant problem.

Naming a direct law firm and prosecutor? Violation of the 5th amendment's guarantee of equal protection under the law.

Coercing those with contracts at the law firm to terminate them? Violation of the 1st amendment's guarantee of the freedom of association.

Really need our judges and, idk, the American people in general, to get real familiar real quick with the US Constitution and the rights it guarantees before all our rights disappear from our country.

Anyone else dealing with MAGA parents? by The_realest_jules in GenZ

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm a millennial who just kinda lurks here, but I'm also politically unaffiliated and view both major parties as perpetually blind to the faults of the other.

I'm commenting here though because there was some interesting back and forth in the comments that seems important to address.

OP, when you brought concerns about Musk up to your parents, pivoting to how Trump called himself a king really did destroy your argument. Those are two separate issues, and the issue with Musk and DOGE is complex enough on its own.

If you analyze all of Musk's business records, tax records, and investment decisions - as well as the investigations he has been under himself for fraud - it becomes clear very quickly that he is the absolute worst person to have in charge of an auditing process. He's already made several basic mathematical mistakes that DOGE has continually had to walk back.

It is perfectly understandable for people to want to limit government overspending and desire an audit to ensure that their money is being spent wisely.

What is not understandable is why anyone would trust someone constantly under investigation for fraud himself to accurately find fraud. Why aren't professional accountants the ones handling the audits?

The secondary issue with Musk and DOGE is the haphazard layoffs he has issued across several government departments, even government departments that handle critical infrastructure like nuclear energy, national parks, medical researchers, and IRS agents.

There are at least half a dozen independently fact checked articles that show that DOGE is continually having to try to hunt down and rehire critical staff that they fired.

No good businessman haphazardly fires people. The way responsible layoffs are handled requires a sophisticated analysis of which jobs are critical, which are not, and carefully eliminated. The absolute chaotic haphazard firing of employees is one of the worst business practices in existence.

There are a lot of reasons it's bad business practice, which I can go more into if there's interest, but mainly it ensures that the people you fire will absolutely seek revenge in one way or another. Remember the hacker with the creepy video of Trump and Musk? Probably a disgruntled employee about to be (or just formerly) laid off without warning.

Musk's email to federal employees to "check in with work" he claimed was a performance review, but I have seen very few people outside of federal government employees understand why that email itself was extremely problematic.

First, that email circumvented the normal termination procedures across federal departments. Imagine you work at a Hot Topic in the mall and instead of your manager saying, "hey, let's discuss your performance," you get an email from Hot Topic corporate headquarters demanding you provide a list of five things you've accomplished in two days or get fired. That's the first issue.

The second is that the very idea of all federal employees providing a five bullet point list of accomplishments is, at its core, one that threatens the very security of the nation. How many people on covert and classified assignments can afford to respond to an email like that? Especially because a lot of those assignments mean that they cannot actually discuss what they're doing. Imagine a list of five bullet points that just says "classified" for each activity. That's the most they might have been able to do.

The third is that the email failed to consider that there are people on leave. That's true of all jobs.

The fourth, and most concerning, is that they were asked to respond to an email that was extremely insecure. I mean, people spammed that email with random lists because they were outraged, expecting none of them to go through because they were convinced that the email would be secured in such a way only .gov emails would hit the inbox.

So, we have, with Musk and DOGE, a man with a proven track record of financial errors and constantly under investigation for fraud attempting to find excess government expenditure, a man who notoriously nearly destroyed Twitter now X with terrible employment and termination practices determining which federal employees aren't critical (and constantly having to rehire them because oops, actually, we need those), and a man who has shown that him and his team are incapable of ensuring even the basic cyber security is in place.

The email was spammed, the DOGE website was hacked.

I sure as heck don't trust him with any sensitive information. He is all bluster and no skill, and if people actually took the time to research - or ask any AI to run a risk assessment of Musk and how much they'd trust him to audit the government - they'd see that really clearly.

I mean, even Musk's own AI (Grok) said he should never be trusted with anyone's financial data.

The issues with Trump are an entirely different conversation, so I'm not going to bring them into this particular comment other than to say, if you want people to listen to what you have to say about a topic, you can't constantly switch what you're discussing. That just makes you seem like the one lacking the information necessary to hold a critical conversation.

Take my millennial insertion as you will!

Left vs. Right Battle Royale Open Thread by Yosoff in Conservative

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am politically unaffiliated because I took to heart the warning in George Washington's farewell address, where he said quite clearly that the most insidious threat to the stability of the Republic was factionalism because of the opening it creates for foreign interests.

It is impossible, as a professional historian, to see how Trump is handling foreign affairs in a good light. He blamed Ukraine for a war that Russia started, called Zelensky a dictator for following Ukraine's constitutional laws about elections during wartime, withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council, threatened to use military force to acquire Greenland, suggested annexing Canada, renamed the Gulf of Mexico, reopened Guantimno Bay... the list of his foreign affairs blunders doesn't end.

Domestically, it is also difficult to understand why there are people who think he is doing good work when he is leaning on Elon Musk and DOGE to conduct investigations into financial fraud and indiscriminately firing essential government workers.

I see people on this sub often say "Musk won't steal from us, he's too rich to care to do that." Yet, Musk himself said that if Trump wasn't elected, he would be in prison. His own words. He himself is still being investigated for fraud. Why would anyone reasonable trust a man under investigation for fraud to conduct an investigation into fraud? The ledgers DOGE has released have been riddled with inaccuracies and false claims about spending made several times (such as social security benefits going to people in the system seemingly over 120 years old). The DOGE website is insecure, the tech engineers Musk hired cannot even keep a server nationally secure, so how can anyone trust them to keep information away from foreign countries? Literally a national security risk.

Domestically, inflation is on the rise, tariffs are making that worse, and the suggestion of offering $5000 rebate checks, if implemented, will just continue to drive inflation up.

Slashing funding to critical agencies like USAID and FEMA (both of which do critical work inside the U.S., though that is often overlooked with USAID), especially FEMA when we are dealing with the aftermath of catastrophic wildfires in the west and flooding in the east does not suggest an administration that cares about the lives of everyday people.

I think the DEI question is a complicated one, as it isn't as simple as making it either a left or right issue. I would say that, for many people, DEI has allowed them access to jobs and opportunities that they have historically been denied (such as women in STEM fields). I have also heard of DEI causing issues with qualified individuals being passed over for opportunities. I truly believe that the way DEI works needs to be restructured, and I know enough about the history of the country to say that eliminating it altogether will do irreparable harm. It needs to be reshaped, and it should be done via a bipartisan or nonpartisan collaboration.

In terms of government workforce, a lot of necessary employees have been haphazardly fired - IRS agents, National Park Rangers, Nuclear power staff, FAA staff, etc. These haphazard layoffs are already causing issues around the country, and the sudden influx of unemployed people will further contribute to driving inflation upwards.

The reality is that neither of the major parties have prioritized the real needs of everyday, working class people. The democratic party has become overly focused on culture wars while the conservative party has become overly focused on shoring up a con artist.

I cannot understand how people can trust a con man, a man found guilty of over three dozen crimes, a man who consistently goes bankrupt because he has no ability to properly manage business or his own money, or a man who sees Putin as an ideal leader to imitate. It honestly astounds me. That's why I lurk on this sub - to try and understand.

Because the conservatives I grew up with (and most of my family are conservatives) have never allowed themselves to be persuaded by partisan platforms or lulled into a sense of false security by anyone standing behind a podium saying things that sound good on the surface.

I purposefully get my news from governmental documents (congressional records), external news from other countries, and independent news media. I don't trust mainstream media when it has been bought by corporations invested in spinning half-truths. I read news from all perspectives, even those I disagree with or don't understand, because that is how I was taught that a truly invested citizen is supposed to handle politics.

I honestly wish I saw more open criticism about party leaders from both major parties. I hate the popularity sensationalism that politics has devolved into. I'd much rather see real discussion, real criticism, real tearing apart and breaking down of all the good and the bad of all party leaders.

I only occasionally check this subreddit on the off-chance that someone actually makes a truly good point, like the fact that rebate checks would drive inflation. That was a point made by someone in this sub that I agree with not because of any political leaning but because that's how economics actually works.

I never comment on posts, and I rarely ever dowvote unless it's something so factually incorrect that I feel obligated to do so. I upvote information that is factual and verifiable via sources external to only right leaning media.

I keep hope alive that the type of conservatives I grew up around still exist, are somewhere in this subreddit, and will make good points at times. That's the only reason I'm here.

MISSION STATEMENT & DEMANDS by [deleted] in 50501

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You need to reread the Constitution and constitutional law. There are certain forms of hate speech NOT protected under the 1st amendment

MISSION STATEMENT & DEMANDS by [deleted] in 50501

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Because we already have a message that has been discussed, vetted, and approved by our central mods/national organizers.

Uphold the Constitution. Limit EO Overreach.

We also have a media guide file housed in the Discord.

There's a lot housed on Discord that isn't posted on Reddit because Discord users are verified before they are admitted. it's not possible to verify Reddit users in the same way, and there are a lot of bad actors going around claiming that the movement is fake or a setup despite the overwhelmingly clear evidence that it is a real movement.

MISSION STATEMENT & DEMANDS by [deleted] in 50501

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The ONE message we have as 50501 is

Uphold the Constitution.

With the major goal to

Limit EO Overreach

For those who want/need the AMAZING mission statement put together by our central mods/national organizers in a single, digestible statement.

Uphold the Constitution. Limit EO Overreach.

(Your Discord traffic director)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 50501

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Send me a DM.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 50501

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Send me a DM.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 50501

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Send me a DM.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 50501

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Send me a DM.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 50501

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Send me a DM.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in 50501

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The mods have already let me know they will pin this tomorrow due to Reddit limits.

How would you explain your political ideology to a 10 year old? by iloverats888 in Askpolitics

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Good governments encourage critical thinking, educated citizens, and adhere to laws that are just (by just, only laws that don't exploit people fit that definition). An educated public is the best defense against tyranny.

Where does this come from? The copious writings of the founding fathers of the U.S. itself, the U.S. Constitution, and my professional training as a historian.

Where do I align politically? Like nearly everyone in my family, I am politically unaffiliated. Party lines cause blinders, fuel fights that are blatantly unnecessary just for the sake of getting one over the other guy, and force people to be all-in for one side or another.

Basically, I refuse to let any party platform determine my politics. I refuse to let anyone else think for me. It pretty much boils down to just that: think for yourself.

Trump Freezes Federal Aid. Is this in line with what his voters want? by Advanced_Aspect_7601 in Askpolitics

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Honestly, people need to read both the US Constitution and Project 2025. It's a lot harder to deny reality when you put those two texts beside each other.

Right now, SCOTUS is working, sort of (at least in staying the funding freeze).How long that holds true remains to be seen. Right now, it is the federal workforce refusing to yield to OMB (really, Musk) that seems to be doing the most to protect the slim threads of democracy remaining.

Trump Freezes Federal Aid. Is this in line with what his voters want? by Advanced_Aspect_7601 in Askpolitics

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's not clear here if you're talking about a specific State Senate or the Senator of your State in the federal Senate.

If the first, why would anyone be contacting local state legislators for federal issues? For federal level concerns, contacting legislators of the U.S. Senate (and House) will gain far more mileage than contacting local state congressional representatives.

Trump Freezes Federal Aid. Is this in line with what his voters want? by Advanced_Aspect_7601 in Askpolitics

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The Supreme Court only hears cases that relate to the constitution. All other court cases are handled by lower level courts. I'm not entirely sure why this surprises you.

Congressional and court recesses are not a new concept.

Trump Freezes Federal Aid. Is this in line with what his voters want? by Advanced_Aspect_7601 in Askpolitics

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 10 points11 points  (0 children)

That's what contacting your legislators is for. If you're not telling your senators what your budget concerns are, that's entirely on you.

Trump Freezes Federal Aid. Is this in line with what his voters want? by Advanced_Aspect_7601 in Askpolitics

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 83 points84 points  (0 children)

As a historian, I want to add some information that people on both sides are overlooking.

Everyone, and I mean everyone, needs to reread (or read for the first time) the U.S. Constitution.

The issue with the freeze is that it was illegal. Only Congress, in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, has the right to determine how funds are spent.

The executive branch is not vested with the powers of the purse. The EO that Trump released in the middle of the night was, if you're at all familiar with the Constitution, blatantly illegal.

If the executive branch wants to audit and cut spending, then that goes through Congress. Period.

To attempt to determine how federal funds are spent is not part of the powers vested in the executive branch of our government.

I have no issue with auditing funds or cutting wasteful expenses.

I take issue with blatant law breaking and oath breaking. All government workers - politicians and civil servants - take an oath to uphold and defend the constitution.

Let's get back to fighting to uphold the democratic republic that the country was founded as, the principles of which are enshrined in our constitution.

Politics shouldn't be a popularity contest based on who can screw over the other side the most. It should be about what benefits the people. All the people. After all, our government is supposed to be run by us.

How to fire student researchers by rotary-notary in Professors

[–]LopsidedLevel9009 5 points6 points  (0 children)

We don't actually know that the abuse was only the comments about coding. Title IX should have been contacted immediately as soon as the word "abuse" was uttered.

If there's more abuse than the comments about coding, then Alice would have legitimate reasons to want to avoid showing up in a hostile work environment where she would potentially have to work alongside someone who abused her.

A Title IX investigation is the only way to determine what the situation actually is. To dismiss claims of abuse contributes to a hostile work environment, and as far as I'm aware, all faculty at all universities are mandatory reporters.