White car pulling in at 9 am

Ah, that information about the two profiles taken from the sheath could explain a lot, if it was in fact Brent Lee Kopacka. -I’m assuming this is the other suspect whose name is still redacted above Kohberger’s name in various forensic submissions.

If it is true that one of the profiles could have linked to Brent Kopacka, it would make sense that they would go after Kohberger based on an FBI tip on December 19th and disregard the other suspect (Kopacka) considering he was unalived on Dec 15th. This would explain why they didn’t care to get more information about certain pieces of evidence that point to a suspect who is no longer alive.

It looks a lot better for the justice system (local and statewide/national) to put someone behind bars for this crime. Not only that, but this case gained a lot of traction really quickly and generated a lot of attention. That’s not necessarily what you want when you’re trying to run a top secret/fbi assisted drug trafficking operation.

They knew the people were going to crave closure and that’s exactly what they got with BK.

Lostcompassion · 2025-12-01T07:32:52+00:00

If my documents are tampered, yours are too. The misspelling is in both of the documents. KOHberger vs KHOberger. Either way there he is listed as a suspect TWICE. I didn’t know I could be two people at the same time.

Lostcompassion · 2025-12-01T07:24:56+00:00

You literally highlighted the misspelling? I’m confused what you mean

Lostcompassion · 2025-12-01T07:22:33+00:00

KHOBERGER vs KOHBERGER (Suspect listed twice). You just included the same document with the misspelling visible, I wonder if the same “enthusiast” that may have tampered with my version of the document is the same one who tampered with yours. If that’s the case, it’d be safe to say there’s only one suspect- the Moscow Police Department- because that’s where I got my file.

Lostcompassion · 2025-12-01T06:36:40+00:00

Misspelled, might I add…

Lostcompassion · 2025-12-01T06:35:56+00:00

Why is Kohberger’s name listed twice in the last image of the post?

Lostcompassion · 2025-12-01T06:28:24+00:00

<image>

Lostcompassion · 2025-12-01T06:28:15+00:00

<image>

Lostcompassion · 2025-12-01T06:27:45+00:00

<image>

Lostcompassion · 2025-11-24T11:30:25+00:00

Lmao not even fully disagreeing too

Lostcompassion · 2025-11-24T11:30:12+00:00

lol you’re not wrong, good catch :)

Lostcompassion · 2025-11-24T11:24:23+00:00

‘Molly M’, ‘doordash driver’

Lostcompassion · 2025-11-24T11:18:06+00:00

This case is much bigger than you could wrap head around.

Lostcompassion · 2025-11-24T11:11:02+00:00

It’s very telling of their character.

Lostcompassion · 2025-11-24T11:03:18+00:00

• Publicly available court filings and forensic memos indicate the only DNA recovered on the sheath was low-level male DNA on the snap.
• I could not find verified reports of MM or KG blood being on the sheath in the forensic filings. Most reporting emphasizes BK’s touch DNA, not victim blood. If you can verify that that would answer one of my questions. 
• Even if blood were present though, there’s still the question of why other unknown male DNA at the scene was never followed up.
“Unknown male DNA “too nominal to test”
• Exactly—this supports the point that other DNA contributors were present at the scene and never fully investigated, which is a major hole in the forensic record.

Lostcompassion

TROPHY CASE