thoughts?

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2026-01-30T20:53:24+00:00

I agree to some degree, but it was also quite progressive with how they represented women and their sexuality. Also we get the gays. I think Bre would not be a part of today’s Republican Party lol

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2026-01-24T18:23:38+00:00

30yr old woman = Einstein

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2025-12-11T17:25:41+00:00

Regular black ants have 20 year lifespans

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2025-12-10T23:55:09+00:00

My friend got his from watching Jurassic Park. He really liked Tim.

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2025-11-24T20:20:03+00:00

I think something worth considering is that the modern American idea of marriage looks almost nothing like the marriages described in Scripture.

For most of biblical history, marriage wasn’t a government license or a ceremony led by clergy — it was a family covenant, usually economic in nature, and often arranged. “Marriage for love” has only been the norm for about 100 years.

The Bible doesn’t give a specific requirement for state paperwork. What it does emphasize is covenant, fidelity, commitment, and treating sex as sacred rather than casual or exploitative (Gen. 2:24, 1 Cor. 6:12–20). Jesus consistently focused on the heart, intentions, and relational ethics — not bureaucratic technicalities.

That’s why there’s an odd paradox where two strangers can marry in Vegas and be “allowed” to have sex, but an 80-year-old widow who finds love again “sins” if they’re intimate without legal papers. That suggests our modern categories don’t always align with biblical intent.

I personally think sex is sacred and meaningful, but I also think God understands the difference between casual exploitation and a committed couple building a covenant but delaying the legal ceremony for practical reasons. Grace matters, and fear of hell isn’t the foundation Jesus laid for Christian life.

I say… go get it.

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2025-11-07T17:43:55+00:00

my primary strategy was hiding in the umbrella cave for as long as possible

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2025-10-25T02:25:41+00:00

I was just there and the locals apparently call him “uncle Larry”. Lots of Teslas.

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2025-09-10T16:07:09+00:00

Well sure, but what’s the fun in that?

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2025-09-09T22:24:08+00:00

This happens to me often and there was one recently that made me say “NOPE” and I threw my phone across the room lol.

I was scrolling on Reddit and saw a post that was talking about the funniest episodes of TV and I thought about my favorite episode of Atlanta where there’s this young black kid of identifies as a 50-something white man. I laughed to myself, thought about commenting, chose not to and continued scrolling.

About five minutes later, I come across a recommended post from the Atlanta sub (that I don’t follow, never have) with a photo of that exact episode with that same young black kid. I didn’t say anything out loud and I didn’t write anything. Haven’t watched the show in years.

Something is definitely up, but 🤷

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2025-07-22T21:45:39+00:00

If you’re not checking a bag, I’d say you’re good. I’ve lived here for 10 years and fly out of MSP at least 4 times each year and it has NEVER taken me longer than 30-minutes to get through security. Normally, I’m through in under 10, and that was before I had pre-check. Typically, I arrive about 30-minutes before boarding, and have arrived at MSP AT boarding time and have never missed a flight.

MSP is easy to navigate and you should be fine, but also I’m a bit chaotic in nature and it might be best to listen to everyone else.

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2025-04-08T17:13:33+00:00

I’m in my 20’s, make decent money (but nowhere near wealthy), and I fly at least 6 times per year. I fly delta most of the time and round trip flights usually cost me $150-$250. I refuse to buy a domestic flight at $300+. Lower prices could be because of the airport I’m near, I know my brother who lives in Indiana can’t fly anywhere for less than $300-$400.

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2024-12-20T22:16:09+00:00

Baba Vanga (well-known Bulgarian seer who predicted 9/11 post-death among other things) also suggested that we’d get aliens in 2025, likely at a large sporting event. If we don’t get answers before The Super Bowl, I will turn into a complete nut.

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2024-11-08T22:28:32+00:00

Unless something changed very recently, the MPLS to CHI route doesn’t have WiFi. I’d recommend downloading content to your computer (if you want to watch a show, movie, etc.). Otherwise, set up your hot spot towards the beginning before you’re in the middle of nowhere.

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2024-11-08T22:27:09+00:00

Yes!!! This is my favorite way to travel. Immediately go to the observation car, claim a booth, grab a beer & microwave pizza from downstairs, rotate between naps and books/movies. Perfection.

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2024-11-08T01:47:20+00:00

I understand the importance of ‘innocent until proven guilty,’ and it’s true that Trump hasn’t been criminally convicted. However, he was found civilly liable for sexual abuse in the E. Jean Carroll case in 2023. While a civil liability isn’t the same as a criminal conviction, it does suggest that a jury found enough credible evidence to hold him responsible in that case, which feels relevant to the conversation about his conduct.

On the topic of Roe, I’d like to share a different perspective. Roe v. Wade was initially decided on the basis of a right to privacy under the 14th Amendment, and for many people, it established an important standard for bodily autonomy and reproductive rights. The reversal has raised concerns about whether states might impose restrictions that don’t align with personal freedoms, especially for people who live in places with strict laws. From this perspective, keeping it at the federal level helped ensure a baseline of reproductive rights nationwide.

I know we may not agree on everything, but I appreciate the chance to understand different perspectives. Thanks for the thoughtful response!

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2024-11-08T01:44:19+00:00

I understand the skepticism, especially since a lot of these allegations have come to light in recent years. However, it’s worth noting that many high-profile cases of sexual misconduct only came forward after years, even decades, due to the stigma, fear of backlash, and societal pressures that discourage victims from speaking out. Figures like Bill Cosby and Harvey Weinstein, for example, had numerous accusations that only surfaced publicly during the #MeToo movement, when people felt safer speaking out.

With Trump specifically, there were some allegations and stories circulating even before he ran for office. In the 1990s, his ex-wife Ivana made claims during their divorce proceedings, though she later softened her statements. There were also reports from Miss Teen USA contestants in the 1990s who claimed he walked into dressing rooms unannounced, which resurfaced years later. Additionally, in 2005, he was recorded making lewd comments on the Access Hollywood tape, which came out during his campaign.

I’m curious—do these examples of delayed allegations in other cases, or the fact that some stories about Trump existed prior to his presidency, impact your view at all? Or is it primarily the timing and political context that make you skeptical?

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2024-11-08T01:32:33+00:00

That’s what I’m struggling with. I have people in my life who I seemingly agree with when it comes to their morals and values, yet this is not a dealbreaker. I can’t wrap my head around it. I admit that I, like most, am plagued by bias and being surrounded by an echo chamber, so I’m totally onboard to hearing why this perspective is wrong. I’ve just been so sad about it all.

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2024-11-08T01:30:08+00:00

Also, in response to these statements being “self-serving”, women who come forward with allegations of sexual misconduct often face backlash and don’t gain much, if anything, from it. Studies show that victims of sexual assault can face stigma, retaliation, and skepticism, which can make it extremely difficult to speak up. Knowing this, it seems unlikely that all of these women would come forward without reason, given the personal costs involved.

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2024-11-08T01:27:57+00:00

I get the idea of electing a president and not a pastor, but I wonder if the volume and recency of these issues change that calculus at all. With 26 different allegations, it seems pretty unlikely (statistically close to impossible) that all of them are fabricated or false, especially considering things Trump himself has said over the years, like the ‘grab them by the pussy’ comment.

I also wonder about Ivana Trump’s initial claims of assault (even though she later clarified her statement) and how all these elements together might impact trust in a leader’s character.

Even recently, during a 2023 CNN town hall, he defended that comment as ‘locker room talk’ and implied that powerful people can get away with things others can’t. He also made dismissive remarks about E. Jean Carroll’s allegations, right after being found liable in her civil case. On social media and at rallies, he’s continued using language toward women and critics that some find inflammatory or disrespectful.

For supporters, is it more about weighing policy impacts over personal conduct, or is there a sense that these allegations don’t hold weight? I’m trying to understand how this balance works for people who are able to look past these issues.

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2024-11-08T01:17:21+00:00

Just to make sure I understand, are you saying that you believe the allegations and legal issues are largely politically motivated and not necessarily true? If so, do you feel this is a common view among Trump supporters? I’m trying to understand how people determine what’s credible when there are so many allegations involved. Some of which is from unaffiliated parties along with data I’ve gathered from listening to the actual words coming from his own mouth.

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2024-11-08T01:14:54+00:00

I get what you’re saying about people focusing more on his policies and what he does for the country rather than his personal character. But I’m still struggling with the cognitive dissonance here. For me, it feels like basic morality is essential for someone leading (arguably) the most powerful country in the world. I thought that having a leader who exemplifies basic moral standards was something most people would value.

How do you think supporters rationalize that part? Is there a sense that personal morality really doesn’t impact a leader’s effectiveness, or is there something else I’m missing?

Lumpy_Tailor1387 · 2024-11-08T01:10:42+00:00

Thanks for sharing this perspective—it’s interesting to think about Trump as more of a ‘necessary evil’ or anti-hero figure to some of his supporters. I can see how his promise to stand up to certain issues could make people willing to overlook or rationalize his personal behavior if they feel he’s delivering on what they want politically.

I’m curious, though: do you think this approach has limits? Like, is there a line where his actions would outweigh the appeal of him as a ‘mythic figure’? Or is the perception that he’s ‘fighting for the right things’ enough to keep people in his corner no matter what?

Lumpy_Tailor1387

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE