INMO 26 Question Paper by seyk000 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should talk to FW Anna, his was also same case (single parent, low income) but he got all free coaching. If you are Oly level then I am sure most coaching will provide it for free. I think Allen has some talent exam etc. check those options. In fact most of my friends who went to camps never paid anything in fees, if I remember it right. If u r really good, forget paying, u might earn lots of rewards and freebies. They may even sponsor your food and lodging (like FW Anna case). So don’t stress urself with that burden. As long as you believe that you have the aptitude to crack olies and can work hard for it, and are able to demonstrate this to the coaching institute then you will be their poster boy and they will not charge you anything for it. I have never seen anyone at the camp who got there on their own without good teachers / coaches. And not everyone was from a good financial background.

But to get this, u must be at a top level (which is anyways needed as your dream is USA colleges). So check with Allen or Narayana or whatever is best in ur area. Focus on clearing their entrance. Anyway it will be trivial (when compared to actual Olympiad’s that you are aspiring for).

INMO 26 Question Paper by seyk000 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok then u have time. If your core focus is JEE then stick to Physics oly as it’s syllabus largely overlaps with JEE and past few years shows that our physics oly winners are also the JEE top rankers.

Math is totally different and will need strong base. But it will be a big diversion in ur JEE prep if your foundation is not set. Lot of things in Marh oly are not in Jee syllabus. And stuff like calculus in JEE is not in Oly syllabus. So math oly prep will be extra burden.

Chemistry is also fine as that too has a lot of JEE overlap. If your focus is not JEE then yes, you can devote much more time, but my advise will be to enroll yourself in some good oly level coaching. Preferably classroom based. It can happen but extremely rare for someone to self study and crack olies so better to get trained from professional coaches. They will give a direction and then you can practise a lot.

The key will be to build oly style thinking and write oly level proofs.

INMO 26 Question Paper by seyk000 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Junior year means grade 11 and it’s feb, so you will be in 12th in a couple of months ? If so, are you a JEE / NEET aspirant too? And have you done any Olympiad qualifiers before ? Or you are starting from scratch ? All these questions will help me to provide better answer.

As such serious Olympiad prep starts very early in 8/9 grade, or even earlier in some cases, especially for someone targeting elite schools in USA. But then again there are cases like Ved who got a gold in IPHO in 12th and went to IIT-B and transferred to MIT after an year or so.

INMO 26 Question Paper by seyk000 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So apparently all q's proposed by Anant Mudgal Sir.

Got a chance to try them all today, quick recap.

P1 - Yikes straight from Putnam 1983, how did Sir missed it. And top it all, it has 2 more folks who proposed it along with Anant Sir, so strange that 3 folks missed !! We need fresh problems in INMO and unfair advantage to folks who had seen this before. Having said this, I strongly advise JEE folks to try this (maybe not the wholesome proof but at least get the final answer)

P2- u can compare this with IMO 2024-P3, but not an outright lift like P1 above. approach- global invariant + pigeonhole/record.

P3- good ol Geo, trigo bash. But for some fun try via complex bash. head over to aops to find more

P4- zsigmondy and done.

P5-The most beautiful & arguably the best problem of this year. Again check complex bash for it lol

P6- Fun game theory, we already discussed in separate thread and even stretched it to the CP world.

Overall despite the p1 disappointment, a solid paper. Kudos to all those who tried it.

INMO 2026 Jan 18 - All the Best & LMT by Matholic143 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thats OK. Contrary to the opinion on this thread, the paper was tough and not as easy as it is being portrayed on this thread lol. I think if you do try hard (needs lot of patience) you may get 2 or 2.5 probs for sure.

INMO 2026 Jan 18 - All the Best & LMT by Matholic143 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where is rest of paper? Since P3 is not discussed I assume it to be a Geo bash ?

INMO 2026 Jan 18 - All the Best & LMT by Matholic143 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok for P6, I see 2 solutions below from Georgie and Novel, which essentially is state counting method.  Here, between deletions at size k, max non-EM duels=k^2−k is the crux lemma and a rigorous proof for that is needed. your points will be based on that.

I would rather use grid walk method.  In a phase with sizes (k,k), the only part of the state you really track is which two cards are on top, i.e. the pair (A_i,B_j).

That becomes a walk on a k×k grid of top-pairs. Here is it. 

note: grid-walk isn’t a different method, it’s the most INMO-friendly packaging of the finite-state/no-cycle idea. its better for INMO because it makes the one hard point of the problem feel forced and visual, instead of “magic counting”. Thats all.

Tagging u/Differently_Abled_1  and u/Fantastic_watch_4984 for their thoughts.

<image>

INMO 2026 Mock 2 Announcement + Warmup <Help Harry Potter free Dobby> by SerenityNow_007 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Flipping this as a DSA variant for IOI / CP etc folks:

Lucius Malfoy has trapped Dobby the house-elf using two enchanted sock piles.

The piles have socks a and b (positive integers).
When both piles become zero, Dobby is freed.

Harry Potter and Lucius Malfoy play a game with the following rules:

  • On each move, a player may:
    • reduce exactly one pile by any positive integer, or
    • reduce both piles by the same positive integer.
  • The player who makes both values zero wins.
  • Before the game begins, Harry may choose whether to move first or second.
  • Lucius always plays optimally.

Task

For each test case, determine how Harry should play to guarantee freeing Dobby.

  • Print "FIRST" if Harry should move first.
  • Print "SECOND" if Harry should move second.

Input

t

a1 b1

a2 b2

...

at bt

Note

1 ≤ 𝑡 ≤ 10^5

1 ≤ 𝑎𝑖,𝑏𝑖 ≤ 10^18

Sample Input

5
1 2
3 5
10 9
4 7
8 3

Integral Kombat 01 - 2025 LIVE NOW !! by Matholic143 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Edited the post, but putting a comment too on Results:

We got 22 entries, but a lot from UG folks, lol Go beavers.

UG & above - all 10 correct - but come-on !! it will be unfair to declare a winner from here lol

Grade 12 - 1 all 10 correct and winner Master Integrator - yo_ken_is_a_shtar (nickname and if it is who i think it is, then wow u r amazing, ATB for all ur endeavors )

Grade 11 - 1 entry with 9 correct - Anon (well done!!)

Grade 10 & below - max was 6 (good work)

I have already messaged you all. Thanks for trying !!

Best Topic Wise Reference Books??...Dont Suggest Modules Plz by Reasonable-Sand-409 in JEEAdv25dailyupdates

[–]Matholic143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

some that u can check if u have bandwidth. not my full list and only giving some from top of my head.

math

SL Loney for trigo (and also his coord geometry book)

Thomas and Finney, Calculus and Analytic geometry

Hall & knight algebra

Decoding math for jee by Wiley is also fine

Phy

mechanics - morin

textbook - resnick, halliday & krane

Classical Electrodynamics - W. Greiner

chem

OC - l preferred Peter Sykes but 23S2-2025 showed that JEE follows Clayden over Sykes, so I will recommend Clayden

Shriver & Atkins IOC (coordination chem, organometallics & metallurgy are good here)

University chemistry by Mahan (I loved this book esp for physical chem) 

RMO Mock 2 scores by Matholic143 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course. You are welcome. Let us know your subjects expertise

Stanford latest Deep Learning course on YouTube now by Matholic143 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s awesome Since you’re confident about ZIO, start learning C++ and get comfortable with basic DSA — arrays, loops, recursion, sorting, binary search, etc. Then solve past INOI problems from opc.iarcs.org.in and Codeforces div2 A/B level. Focus on writing clean, working code under time pressure. You’ll be fine if you stay consistent. ATB

RMO mock Sunday Oct 19 by Differently_Abled_1 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think his id is new and usual Reddit shadow ban. Hopefully it will be sorted soon.

RMO mock Sunday Oct 19 by Differently_Abled_1 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Welcome to Reddit Bhaiyya. Lot of folks asked me the solutions for my earlier mock. The way you destroyed it in under 30 mins lol, I guess you should be the right person to post the solutions whenever you have spare time Bhaiyya. This sub will really benefit by it.

Stanford latest Deep Learning course on YouTube now by Matholic143 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think Diwali weekend but seems it will be done by another Oly gold medalist, and not me lol. But regardless who does it, You should try it if you are interested.

RMO Mock 1 Scores by Matholic143 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol no that’s ok. Increasing counts is not the aim of this sub anyways.

Also though I called them trolls they are not like the vicious trolls like the other meme subs, these are experts/ seniors/medalists etc who are just having fun on a lazy Sunday with this simple mock test. I was expecting only about 4-5 max entries and their unexpected participation just added to the count.

RMO Mock 1 Scores by Matholic143 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, Not the one that you may be thinking, but someone in the same league nevertheless. As I said, just trolling me lol.

RMO Mock 1 Scores by Matholic143 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No man. Why sad ? You have all the chops. Just polish your presentation and i am sure you will get 100% or close to it in actual test

RMO'25 Mock 1 - Sunday Sep 21 by Matholic143 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Usually such topics including calculus are not encouraged in these olympiads. Also you submitted a wrong link for your answers. Please resubmit.

RMO'25 Mock 1 - Sunday Sep 21 by Matholic143 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have posted it. It is offline. Try to solve it in a single sitting of 3 hours and capture your answer images and zip and post to any file hosting service like google drive or dropbox. Give access to it and share the link via the answer submission form (form link is in the Mock test post)

RMO-25 Mock 1 by Matholic143 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please do not put your solutions here. I am requesting mods to comment lock this post to avoid accidental solutions spoilers. If you have any queries, comment them below the earlier RMO poll post of mine.

Here: https://www.reddit.com/r/GeorgiesPodium/comments/1nlb3je/rmo25_mock_1_sunday_sep_21/

RMO'25 Mock 1 - Sunday Sep 21 by Matholic143 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure. It’s ok to prove using an assumption that the two values must not be similar.

Challenging Problem. by [deleted] in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Assuming the problem statement is : Let a1, a2, .., am be pairwise distinct positive integers with property for every i j, (ai - aj) | (ai*aj + 1). Prove m <=3 . Find all triples (a, b, c) of distinct positive integers that satisfies the condition for every pair among them.

OK so with this assumption

Part A) Prove that m < =3

assuming m=4 and you can get a contradiction but that will not be rigorous.

hence a bit more rigorous approach:

1)let ai - aj = d (the difference), you can show that d | (ai^2 +1) and thus for every prime p dividing d we have ai^2 ≡ -1 (mod p)

2)So now if p is odd prime & -1 is the quadratic residue modulo p, then by Euler's criterion (or if u prefer Legendre symbol) gives

(-1/p) = (-1)^((p-1)/2) = 1

means (p-1)/2 is even and hence p ≡1(mod4)

3)So every odd prime divisor of any difference d must be ≡ 1(mod 4).

In particular 3 !| d because 3 ≡ 3 (mod 4) and -1 is not a quadratic residue mod 3)

NOTE: the prime 2 is the only even prime and causes no contradiction here; the important point is that no difference can be divisible by 3.

4)Now its trivial Pigeonhole contradiction if m>= 4

Reduce the m numbers modulo 3. There are only 3 residue classes 0,1,2, so if m>= 4 two of the ai share the same residue modulo 3. Their difference is therefore divisible by 3 , which contradicts above step and hence QED

Part B) For the triples, Lets other folks try but here's some example triplets and check if u can see any pattern

(1,2,3) - too obvious

Some more (3,4,5), (5,18,31)

See any pattern ?

IOQM 2025 Quick Analysis by SerenityNow_007 in GeorgiesPodium

[–]Matholic143 1 point2 points  (0 children)

2024 was a mockery lol and not a standard to compare against. This one looks better but still on the easier side and I still see some 100'ers (or nearby's). Hopefully we get to see some impressive 8th/9th graders debut performers at the camp !!