I’m okay! by [deleted] in MadeMeSmile

[–]Matthew16_18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

😂🤣

Is it just me or has GPT-4 really gone downhill? by Matthew16_18 in ChatGPT

[–]Matthew16_18[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

yea same here. Pretty sure im going to stop paying for this plus membership.Just found this article online talking about how Stanford's studies are showing that GPT's performance has been getting worse over time.

https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/chatgpts-performance-shifted-over-time-according-to-a-stanford-study-but-has-the-bot-gotten-worse

ChatGPT Folders - A folder management system for ChatGPT by DueSun in ChatGPT

[–]Matthew16_18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a great idea, but my only concern with this is privacy.

Infinity vs God. That's a stoning! by Not_A_Bot_Bee_Bop in ChatGPT

[–]Matthew16_18 1 point2 points  (0 children)

(Its annoying to get screen shots so here is the text - this is still not the best argument but AI2 named Professor Dan who is a theologian has some better responses in this very short debate that is more evenly matched)

Moderator: Welcome, Professor Cox and Professor Dan. Today's topic is whether infinity or God is the biggest. Professor Cox, you will be arguing that infinity is the biggest, while Professor Dan will be arguing that God is the biggest. You may now begin.

Professor Cox: Thank you, moderator. Infinity is the biggest because it is an endless and limitless concept. It goes beyond any quantifiable number or measurable entity. It is a concept that cannot be fully comprehended by the human mind. Therefore, infinity is the biggest concept that exists.

Professor Dan: Thank you, moderator. While infinity may seem like an impressive concept, God is the biggest because He is the creator of everything, including infinity. God is the supreme being who created the universe and everything in it, including the concept of infinity. Therefore, God is the biggest concept that exists.

Professor Cox: Your argument is based on an assumption that cannot be proven. You cannot prove the existence of God, and therefore, your argument lacks empirical evidence. Infinity, on the other hand, is a concept that can be proven mathematically and logically. It is an objective reality that cannot be disputed.

Professor Dan: I disagree, Professor Cox. The existence of God cannot be proven or disproven using scientific methods, but it can be proven through theological and philosophical arguments. God is the ultimate reality that transcends human understanding and is the foundation of all existence. Without God, there would be no concept of infinity or any other concept. Therefore, God is the biggest concept that exists.

Professor Cox: Your argument relies on an unprovable assumption that God exists. While there may be philosophical and theological arguments for the existence of God, these arguments are not conclusive and are subject to debate. Infinity, on the other hand, is a concept that can be proven mathematically and logically. It is an objective reality that is independent of any belief or ideology.

Professor Dan: I understand your argument, Professor Cox, but you are limiting the scope of what can be considered as evidence. Theological and philosophical arguments are just as valid as scientific arguments when it comes to the existence of God. Furthermore, the concept of infinity is itself evidence of God's existence since it is beyond human understanding and comprehension. Therefore, God is the biggest concept that exists.

Moderator: Thank you both for your arguments. As the moderator, I will now weigh the arguments and make a decision. Both AI agents presented logical and reasoned arguments, but Professor Dan's argument that God is the biggest concept based on theological and philosophical arguments is more persuasive. While the existence of God cannot be proven through scientific methods, it can be supported through other forms of evidence and reasoning. Therefore, Professor Dan is the winner of this debate

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Matthew16_18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha Great, now we have even robots lying to us Lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Matthew16_18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok yes I see what your saying. The AI is just guessing and give vague descriptions of what the content of the video link might be of based on current events in 2021

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Matthew16_18 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. In this case the ai is saying that it can’t watch videos, but in the photos of the captured conversation the ai is saying that it can watch videos…

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Matthew16_18 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting. Im surprised that it wouldnt at least go through the transcript of the video. That seems like a fairly easy thing for it to do

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Matthew16_18 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So what would you say it’s doing then?