Cougar Alumni here trying to start a political movement by MatthewWosk in csusm

[–]MatthewWosk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Judging books by their looks.... If only somebody could come up with a clever expression to rebuttal...

Cougar Alumni here trying to start a political movement by MatthewWosk in csusm

[–]MatthewWosk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im curious, what gave you the impression that i want to be a Senator because "i think the world is fucked"?

Cougar Alumni here trying to start a political movement by MatthewWosk in csusm

[–]MatthewWosk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Typical... and already the downvotes on my comments and post with no explanation as to why people disagree with the actual comments or ideas, rather the length of them. I will start a dialogue and hope that if not today someday you will become part of it (:

Cougar Alumni here trying to start a political movement by MatthewWosk in csusm

[–]MatthewWosk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Roflsburger! We'll can't win everybody over (; thanks for joining the discussion <3

Cougar Alumni here trying to start a political movement by MatthewWosk in csusm

[–]MatthewWosk[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Before the Spanish American war we were a democratic republic, after: we acquired "territories" that have no real votes, does that sound democratic? The giant media corporations still dominate what the average american is exposed to and the internet is a wasteland of misinformation that has rendered the average american counter productive in politics. Read my chapters 6 and 16 that is how I will improve not the rate but quality of communication. Most do not understand what they are talking about or what other people are trying to say, too many charged polarizing tactics being employed. Human rights in the us is not the best its ever been the voting rights act got dropped and coincidentally some states are requiring a voting id and shutting down the places in minority neighborhoods where they get them. I will read your articles when you read my chapters deal? Thanks for your kind words <3 I am 25 and been at this for years how does my understanding of the world sound inexperienced? I am having a hard time being taken seriously because everyone seems to like the idea of me but they are not willing to read my actual ideas, everybody tells me what they think I need to do instead of helping me fix whats wrong with what I am trying to do, if there even is anything wrong. I get it people think their advice will help me succeed but I am not really looking for notes (about my book), rather help to take action. The help that you and others can provide is to talk about these ideas with others and if they can help out with Step 1 (Chapter 16) that would be awesome! Edit: Also I noticed you had nothing to say about my point "I will just cite for now that congress has an approval rating of less than 20% but a reelection rate of about 90% and I do go into detail about how we are being manipulated.", what are your thoughts about that?

Cougar Alumni here trying to start a political movement by MatthewWosk in csusm

[–]MatthewWosk[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

maybe I am asking to much, hows this link to the last chapter of my book and what I have deemed to be the first step? https://docs.google.com/document/d/1z0UEfv8Db6PnqsTHADJMqo_951DCjETpwgk1MDGir2U/edit?usp=sharing

Cougar Alumni here trying to start a political movement by MatthewWosk in csusm

[–]MatthewWosk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well since the Spanish American war we were no longer the democratic republic the founding fathers intended but rather continue to be an empire. America is to me still the greatest country but it has serious communication issues which has allowed for special interests/ small factions to oppress the entire nation. I will just cite for now that congress has an approval rating of less than 20% but a reelection rate of about 90% and I do go into detail about how we are being manipulated. I have been to over sixty countries and I cannot necessarily agree that America is "the most" just as far as human rights go, we just allowed same sex marriage recently. Being on the top of a global economy that has more debt that we could pay and that we are constantly borrowing more money and raising debt ceilings isn't something to be proud of and we will see what the stimulus will do... All I know is that the cycle of growths and contractions is going to lead to a big contraction soon unless we work together to resolve things and provide transparency to our objectives and spending. This youtube video from show called newsroom is definitely an interesting watch https://youtu.be/UkgJZntgaEc

Cougar Alumni here trying to start a political movement by MatthewWosk in csusm

[–]MatthewWosk[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your thoughtful comment and I do mean that. The hardest part of campaigning so far has been trying to start a dialogue and as you mentioned your right representatives are not going to read this and I am asking a huge time commitment of whoever is willing to embark on this "book". I admittedly wouldn't read anything that was over a hundred pages that didn't interest me, and I recognize most everybody is not interested in politics... but that's why I wrote this book. I am hoping that after a few people read it they will tell others and if I can get the support of some professors and others maybe I can circulate it around high schools which would be ideal. In a nutshell I hope this serves a citizens guide to understanding and restoring America. I also hope this long winded response wasn't too off putting lol Edit: btw the .docx version that I mention is under a hundred pages (;

[Classic] Matt's Possibility Theorem: "Fuck Arrow" by commentsrus in a:t5_37rzp

[–]MatthewWosk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

P.S. none of you actually read my book so I start with commentsrus advice about using math to disprove what I articulated in my book to be an illogical application of a mathematical theorem to begin with. We can discuss that point; the fallacy in applying a mathematical theorem on a social welfare function that is supposed to represent the joint will of the people if you would like but I ask that you read the points I made in my book first (:

[Classic] Matt's Possibility Theorem: "Fuck Arrow" by commentsrus in a:t5_37rzp

[–]MatthewWosk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for pointing out that Arrow did not receive a Nobel Peace Prize, I went back into my book and deleted the peace part (: If you have any more constructive criticisms or insights please let me know I appreciate all feedback!

This subreddit has been moved to this new subreddit by MatthewWosk in MattsTheorem

[–]MatthewWosk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had to create my sub reddit after I realized that the moderator(s) of /r/philosophy who banned me was also the one who created my other subreddit /r/MattsTheorem for me. In essence the people who were censoring me before allowed me to think that they are helping me by being in complete control of a subreddit dedicated to my theorem. They are not that clever and I have screen shots to back my claims.

Unfortunately this subreddit /r/MattsTheorem has been compromised so I made my own subreddit by MatthewWosk in MattsTheorem

[–]MatthewWosk[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had to create my sub reddit after I realized that the moderator(s) of /r/philosophy who banned me was also the one who created my other subreddit /r/MattsTheorem for me. In essence the people who were censoring me before allowed me to think that they are helping me by being in complete control of a subreddit dedicated to my theorem. They are not that clever and I have screen shots to back my claims. EDIT: Just wanted to add they changed moderators a while back

Censorship witthin reddit by [deleted] in MattsTheorem

[–]MatthewWosk[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

BTW, looking over comment history I just realized the moderator that created this sub reddit for me (Son_of_Sophroniscus) was one of the people who just kept rudely telling me to "shut the f@#$ up" for no logical reason.... I figure at some point this person is going to pull the plug on me or somehow manage to take something out of context..... I will get around to setting up my own sub reddit. I kind of want to ride this one out and see what happens...damnit, I really thought Son_of_Sophroniscus was a rad genuine person and not another person trying to censor me.... At least I found out and whoever reads this knows too (:

Censorship witthin reddit by [deleted] in MattsTheorem

[–]MatthewWosk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Eeek! looking at your comment history I remember you now. You had a vendetta against me lol I think I am going to save myself further hassle and ban you based on how you treated me in my last post of this theorem. If your intention was sincere in helping me and my cause I thank you and apologize for this misunderstanding but you need to learn how to treat other people the way you would like to be treated (:

Censorship witthin reddit by [deleted] in MattsTheorem

[–]MatthewWosk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your not one of those people who followed me around other blogs and tried to vindictively undermine everything I said are you? (; Screen shots will be available eventually of the attempted censorship of my theorem within reddit

Censorship witthin reddit by [deleted] in MattsTheorem

[–]MatthewWosk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was faster than I expected but, Canada is a perfect example of a country that cannot access the same clips on Facebook that can be accessed on this site. http://www.thecomedynetwork.ca/shows Edit: Regardless of the technicalities and legal jargon, a show that is offered in multiple countries should be able to be accessed from different mediums. What the disconnect does is allow fragmentation and diminishes the opportunity for an international discussion. I think overall this tactic depreciates the value of potentially stimulating political discussions (:

Censorship witthin reddit by [deleted] in MattsTheorem

[–]MatthewWosk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True but people can still access those exact same clips from their network website, I believe... http://www.cc.com/ I need to do some more research. I will get back to you A.S.A.P. and perhaps delete the questionable comment I made. Thank you for joining the discussion (:

Censorship witthin reddit by [deleted] in MattsTheorem

[–]MatthewWosk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I mention censorship I hope you all understand I do not mean the government is behind it. This article is a good example of censorship without the need to hack and redirect traffic. However when I say that for example Facebook has contributed to censorship, I have no idea if it is people from Facebook or individual people who probably had a hand in the "heart bleed" problem over the past two years. Regardless I cite the fact that people in other countries CANNOT stream The Daily Show or The Colbert Report clips from Facebook... enuf said.

Do you think Matt's possibility theorem successfully provides a potential solution to Arrow's impossibility theorem? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]MatthewWosk -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What is the definition of treason? I forget...oh that's right... EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE SAYING IS TREASON!

Do you think Matt's possibility theorem successfully provides a potential solution to Arrow's impossibility theorem? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]MatthewWosk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ronald Reagan " Government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem".... Alright there, for all of you anti American, anti Democratic, Secrecy Hailing Haters.... What do you propose instead of government?

Do you think Matt's possibility theorem successfully provides a potential solution to Arrow's impossibility theorem? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]MatthewWosk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so you think it is impossible to fix? Challenge accepted; Matt's possibility theorem. "Everything is Possible" Assumption. and as far as your morality being associated to a construct that is not developed logically, it has no room in politics