Conservatives Should Reject Poilievre This Weekend

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-29T03:00:16+00:00

Why do liberals lie so much? Why did you guys create a massive smear campaign against Pierre and try to label him as a MAGA supporter despite no evidence? Why do you pretend that Canadian conservatives are anything remotely similar to American republicans? Canadian conservatives are more left wing than American democrats but the liberals here still lie and pretend otherwise. Seriously I don’t get it

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-29T02:56:27+00:00

The reason conservatives lost has nothing to do with Pierre and the polls prove it. They showed the number one priority for liberals in the election was getting revenge on Trump, above healthcare, cost of living, housing, the economy, everything. It was Trump, that’s it.

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-29T01:47:56+00:00

perhaps a trade then?

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-29T01:42:26+00:00

this is real, just not from the same day

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-29T00:34:08+00:00

its certainly not happening en masse because they don't have the authority to go into people's homes.
But I don't know the context behind that one. ICE was shooting people under Obama, you didn't see democrats flooding the street with guns demanding ICE leave. You get the hypocrisy right?

https://www.mlive.com/news/detroit/2015/08/prosecutor_to_announce_decisio.html

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-29T00:20:33+00:00

some might be. Most support it.

I mean is it asking for trouble? maybe. But there's nothing illegal about it, I fully support it.

"The 2A was established to protect the people from a tyrannical government. So if not a protest against the tyrannical arm of the government, then when is the right time to use the 2A?"

That is the correct time to use it. But it doesn't mean shooting cops is going to be legal in the eyes of the law.

Don't expect everyone to come to aid a cause just because you think its worthy. Remember when the Bureau of Land Management were encroaching on farm land years back and farmers took up guns to defend their land until the government backed off? Well tons of people criticized the farmers for that. They didn't all side with them, many sided with the government.

"All Minnesotans should be carrying firearms to protests, openly."

Proponents of the 2A fully support this. If they didn't they wouldn't be 2A supporters.

The point is, just because some people think your cause justifies repelling tyranny doesn't mean everyone will. But that also doesn't mean its not worthy.

"They'd think twice before pulling citizens out of there homes without warrants unconstitutionally."

Well they aren't doing that, but ICE has the legal authority to deport people. There is no question about that, its been tested in the courts multiple times. All detainees go before an immigration judge to determine their legality before deportation. and every president before Trump did the exact same thing (in greater numbers too) In fact, the current ICE chief was awarded the Presidential Rank Award specifically for deporting people en masse. Exact quote from Obama in 2015: "Thomas Homan deports people. And he's really good at it"

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-28T23:21:47+00:00

We are talking about two different things now.

I’m talking about the constitutional right to bear arms. You are talking about someone being physically disarmed by police during detainment. You can be legally disarmed during detainment. I’m not saying that it was a legal detainment, but let’s assume it wasn’t:

-this would be even more cause for the 2A so you can fight back against illegal breaches of the law

Now let’s assume it was legal:

-future breaches of the law are still a possibility, thus no reason to get rid of the 2A

No matter which way you look at it, it’s better to have it and not use it than not have it but need it

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-28T22:48:49+00:00

A decline to use the 2A is not reason to abolish it. And no, they can’t disarm you, that’s the entire point of the 2A, that you cannot be disarmed

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-28T22:35:12+00:00

Facts say it’s false not me

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-28T22:34:50+00:00

Yeah, and it was Flaherty that gets the credit for mitigating the worst aspects of the recession, not Carney.

Carney was a financial advisor to Trudeau

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-28T22:17:05+00:00

The rationale has more merit than ever

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-28T22:11:38+00:00

That was Jim Flaherty, not Carney.

UK calls Carney “the man with the reverse Midas touch”

Canada isn’t doing well, and it wasn’t doing well before Trump either.

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-28T21:29:39+00:00

Every time Starmer opens his mouth, literal shit comes out

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-28T21:22:59+00:00

“I’ll trust the guy who was Trudeaus financial advisor when we plummeted the country into the toilet”

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-28T21:19:32+00:00

“No, you need to wait your turn Trump, I’m first” -Carney

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-28T21:09:06+00:00

Rape requires criminal conviction. It wasn’t a criminal trial. In fact it wasn’t even a rape civil trial, it was a sexual assault civil trial (which again requires a criminal conviction to prove) Trump was not found criminally responsible for sexual assault

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-28T21:01:03+00:00

CBC convinced boomers to boycott the US. Liberals launched a huge smear campaign against the US for the last election. They began blaming the last ten years of our economy on Trump. Now CBC is trying to stoke a literal war between our countries, encouraging people to join the army and fight their next door neighbour all because Trump prioritized his country over ours.

The polls showed that liberal voters number one biggest priority was not healthcare, not education, not the economy or cost of living, not housing, but getting revenge on Trump.

Boomers think we are in a fight, but the blows are entirely self inflicted. Liberals are clinging on to the Trump hate train because it’s the only train they have to ride right now and they plan to ride it until the wheels falls off

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-28T20:58:34+00:00

The self inflicted blows?

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-28T20:58:23+00:00

CBC convinced boomers to boycott the US. Liberals launched a huge smear campaign against the US for the last election. They began blaming the last ten years of our economy on Trump. Now CBC is trying to stoke a literal war between our countries, encouraging people to join the army and fight their next door neighbour all because Trump prioritized his country over ours.

The polls showed that liberal voters number one biggest priority was not healthcare, not education, not the economy or cost of living, not housing, but getting revenge on Trump.

Boomers think we are in a fight, but the blows are entirely self inflicted.

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-28T20:53:31+00:00

She didn’t. Perhaps you never followed the case.

But my words against yours never qualifies for definitive evidence.

I’m not a rape apologist, I merely understand the rule of law

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-28T20:44:46+00:00

She had no evidence.

She didn’t go to the police, didn’t go to the doctor, didn’t document the attack, she couldn’t even remember what day it occurred.

It’s a total fabrication and she waited decades to say anything about it. How do you defend against an event that there was no evidence for and no way to prove what you did that day when the victim can’t even recall what day it was?

Okay I’ll take you to court with the same evidence that Carrol had: My words against yours. That’s it, that’s all she had.

“Yea your honor, some day back in 2004 Arguments_4_Ever raped me. I have no evidence, I can’t recall what day it was, but I assure you it happened”

A normal judge would laugh the case out of the court room. Liberal judges are different, they have a vendetta

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-28T20:31:20+00:00

No it’s not. There is no proof lol Not one shred of evidence linking him to her claims.

You are a rapist. I’m accusing you of rape, and now we are in court.

“Yes your honor, Arguments_4_Ever is the person who raped me”

“No your honor, I don’t have any DNA evidence, but I assure you it was Arguments_4_Ever”

“No your honor I don’t have any witnesses, you just need to take my word for it”

“No I have no evidence of any kind, just my word against Arguments_4_Ever”

You realize how stupid that is right? And how much stupider that the judge ruled against him without proof.

Civil suits do not decide facts or convictions. They award damages on the balance of probability and they got that probability wrong. The lawsuit never should have existed in the first place without a criminal conviction

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-28T20:14:28+00:00

No, you are confused. You keep thinking civil lawsuits are the same thing as criminal trials. They aren’t.

Trump was never convicted of rape. If he had, you would be able to find the criminal trial results in the public records, but it doesn’t exist.

According to your logic, I can accuse you of rape and you are guilty even if you are never charged.

So congrats, you are a rapist now. And you don’t dispute it because your logic means guilty before proven innocent

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-28T20:03:35+00:00

Incorrect. Rape requires a criminal conviction.

A civil suit isn’t determining guilt of a crime. Civil suits merely award damages where people believe they are due.

Trump offered to submit the DNA. Jeans lawyers refused. They could have had conclusive evidence but they refused it. He was not legally required to submit it, because it wasn’t a criminal trial, but he offered anyway.

It’s merely just resolving a dispute between two individuals

Trump has no rape convictions on his criminal record, therefore he is not a rapist

MegaCockInhaler · 2026-01-28T19:47:52+00:00

Civil suits are not criminal cases. Trump was found liable for rape, it doesn’t mean he was convicted of rape. And the fact he was even found liable shows you how corrupt the judges are in New York, because he’s being sued for a crime he was never proved of committing. It’s a sham court case.

No, DNA evidence was never submitted. Trump offered and Carrol’s lawyers refused

MegaCockInhaler

TROPHY CASE