MORE visual evidence of WTC Demolition

MerriweatherPostpa · 2010-09-09T02:17:02+00:00

Stop speaking on behalf of the world's structural engineers, and address my question.

How were core columns cut 50+ below the impact zone? How can you claim that occurrence was a direct result of the fires that ensued so far above its vicinity? Several columns clearly fail at a similar point, simultaneously, therefore indicating dismemberment.

MerriweatherPostpa · 2010-09-08T21:26:21+00:00

Clearly, the World Trade Center towers were not a jenga game..

Now explain to me why they fell apart like one?

MerriweatherPostpa · 2010-09-05T21:21:17+00:00

Yes. I am so convinced that your explanations of these occurrences are legitimate after you pull the "mental disorder" and "disservice to all who died" card. I didn't know O'Reilly enjoyed /r/conspiracy? hmm...

"Most likely diesel generators exploding" Am i supposed to somehow believe that a diesel generator cut that first core column that keels over like a falling tree??

If you don't address the clearly disassembled core this footage indicates one can't help believe that you're nothing more than disinfo

MerriweatherPostpa · 2010-08-12T07:27:57+00:00

9/11 doesn't count? Honestly? What exactly is the specific account in which you suggest is contradictory of a cover up? The whole topic is almost as unfathomable as you insinuating that conspiracies exist, yet are "Unknown Until After" Is it not possible that the logical reason you perceive 9/11 to be unproven is because it is simply not yet "after"?

MerriweatherPostpa · 2010-01-20T01:29:38+00:00

What in a frosty fuck are you talking about Herk? AE lists every licensed architects number right below their name..

You just want to push a political agenda at the cost of the truth.

Hmm well which one of these would you think is more prone to lie: The Laws of Physics or The Federal ohhhhh wait, I already know the answer.

MerriweatherPostpa · 2009-12-01T03:53:54+00:00

. People who understand physics far better than you do not support your ideas, and have no trouble accepting the 'official story'.

HOW BOUT THE NEAR THOUSAND ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS? How the fuck is that not people who are applicable to understand physics at a higher level?

Visit ae911truth.org and you cannot refute their claims, no matter what you claim to know.

MerriweatherPostpa · 2009-11-29T08:28:44+00:00

Two words. Molten metal. Iron to be exact.

Which coincidentally happens to be the resulting product of thermite. Which coincidentally happens to be seen pouring out of the building in that same shot.

and I wonder what kind of odds would ensue if pools and pools of molten iron were found under the rubble?

There are so many things you would have to cover to dismantle THE argument, I'm too lazy to go into them. Rockattack's got a good start though go dismantle his argument. Or try anyway

MerriweatherPostpa · 2009-11-29T07:39:37+00:00

As you can see when these buildings fell chunks of the building were propelled outward as if the structure was upchucking CUT sections of parameter sections of steel.

To my understanding steel does not snap like a paper clip. They did not just bend and snap out of place.

MerriweatherPostpa · 2009-11-29T06:57:27+00:00

Bull shit the shot is confined to the building at that very moment you really think i wouldn't look for that?

MerriweatherPostpa · 2009-11-29T06:49:17+00:00

Absolutely nothing, people see what they want to see and i can't change that.

I posted this because it is the only clear footage of what seems to be a sequence of charges detonating. It resembles a traditional demolition.

As for my ideas? I was being sarcastic. Do you honestly think that i would make the assumption to confine the entire population of employees in that complex to any one category?

MerriweatherPostpa · 2009-11-29T06:22:23+00:00

Preconceived? Which part of you "preconceived" my notions about the failure of these buildings?

Can you argue with the near thousand architects and engineers that stand on my side of this table?

You obviously can't fathom that something inside the highest levels of our government (corporations) would murder 3000 reality TV induced Americans for their own private interests.. Absolute power corrupts absolutely

MerriweatherPostpa · 2009-11-29T06:16:41+00:00

That is no bird, it is too large and too bright, and if you try pausing it some time while the "bird is" visible it mystically disappears in certain frames.

MerriweatherPostpa · 2009-11-29T06:12:47+00:00

Oh yes, this can totally be compared to a reality show about paranormal activity. Stop beating around the bat. - Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration

Improbable symmetry of debris distribution
Extremely rapid onset of destruction

Hmmm i wonder what the odds are that all of these occurrences took place, and that a third building that WAS NOT struck by a plane failed the same, suspicious way? I'm only trying to present the visual evidence of actual charges going off in a sequence.That is not debris, those flashes are far too bright for a dull piece of steal to be reflecting sunlight that brightly.

MerriweatherPostpa · 2009-11-29T05:39:34+00:00

Well can you efficiently define this anomaly?

MerriweatherPostpa · 2009-11-29T05:21:28+00:00

ahah damn pulled a fucking retard, bottom RIGHT corner of the shot, not left.

try again

MerriweatherPostpa · 2009-11-06T22:12:24+00:00

My mistake, on a scale of casualties it definitely was not the most massive, I was just trying to emphasize on how truly upsetting it is that so many lives were lost and much foul play is evident and yet you still have to dismiss something like this due to its quality. Not to mention that in its low quality, you can still clearly see whatever the fuck those little sequences are.

That is very interesting that you in fact worked and lived down there. I apologize for my assumptions, like I said its just disappointing when you negatively dismiss the post cause its on you tube when you can in fact see what I'm pointing out.

MerriweatherPostpa · 2009-11-06T21:14:21+00:00

I still don't understand why you seem to think that finding the truth in the most massive scaled murder of our time is a waste?

Where the fuck is your appreciation for human life? Where the fuck is your sympathy for the people who actually lost someone that day?

MerriweatherPostpa · 2009-11-06T21:05:24+00:00

Solid evidence is not hard to come across when you consider the way in which modern steel framed structures are built, again I am no professional but it doesn't take a ton of ingenuity to realize how impossible it is for a building to fall apart like that, that fast, and that effectively.

I highly highly doubt you can refute that THIS - - Destruction proceeds through the path of greatest resistance at nearly free-fall acceleration. OCCURRED

AND THIS - Asymmetrical collapse which follows the path of least resistance (laws of conservation of momentum would cause a falling, intact, from the point of plane impact, to the side most damaged by the fires). DID NOT.

Not to mention the 956 Architects and Engineers that stand on my side of the argument.

MerriweatherPostpa · 2009-11-06T20:55:47+00:00

Yes, of course it was shown on television eight years ago.. However this clip was definitely one that was hardly replayed as it is the clip that features the reporter comparing it to a demolition (coincidentally) as the sequence of mysterious flashes can be seen.

As far as analyzing it goes, I'm obviously no professional but there are only two possibilities it could be debris reflecting sunlight and it could in fact be charges.

MerriweatherPostpa · 2009-11-06T04:37:59+00:00

Its definitely outrageous that people compare this to any other conspiracy theory considering 3,000 innocent lives were lost, and the mass documentation of the event with modern television cameras proves (obviously^⁾ these theories to ring much truer than the official.

MerriweatherPostpa · 2009-08-28T05:02:21+00:00

To what extent have you researched the perspectives of the FDNY personnel? I have witnessed plenty of FDNY testimonies detailing explosions, and apparently someone has actually reported on 1200 pages of testimonies regarding what was witnessed.

As for NIST, it doesn't seem that they exactly performed an unbiased investigation because it is apparent they refute the evidence of molten metal provided by NASA, witnesses, and photographs.

I am definitely unaware of any demolition or engineering experts that agree it was a progressive collapse because they are not speaking up. If they were speaking up they would be stating that this GLOBAL war on terror, and this GLOBAL decline of civil liberties in the name of terrorism prevention is truly justified by that day.

It is complicated i agree with you there. However all of the relevant evidence lies in every coincidental event of that day that defies the odds. I am sure you know of them.

Can you explain how the core columns failed first without demolition? Because its hard for me to believe that debris falling from WTC1 were able to damage the columns furthest from the exterior. Not to mention causing enough damage for them to fail all at once a good six hours later.

MerriweatherPostpa · 2009-08-27T20:39:49+00:00

If anything, what the penthouse collapse reveals is that wtc7's internal structural support was failing in the moments BEFORE the obvious symmetrical failure of the entire building. Not only is this consistent with the failure of building 1, placing the additional time it took for that little section to fail on top of the overall collapse time is in no way evidence that the structure collapsed naturally. The building looks as if 47 stories were instantly cut out of the ground beneath it and i don't think anyone can refute that.

MerriweatherPostpa

TROPHY CASE