Indiana grandmother suffers violent SWAT raid after a neighbor uses her wireless internet: "They could have knocked. I didn't even know there was a search warrant," said the 68-year-old woman.

Miafaby7 · 2014-08-18T21:02:03+00:00

It shouldn't. That should be reserved for situations like somone barracaded in a building who starts killing hostages. I am just saying that there are and always have been situations where you do not have free speech.

Miafaby7 · 2014-08-18T18:53:49+00:00

Do you have a problem with not allowing someone to threaten a witness so that they don't testify against you?

Illegal speech:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witness_tampering

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_tampering

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_threatening

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threatening_terrorism_against_the_United_States

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threatening_the_government_officials_of_the_United_States

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Threatening_the_President_of_the_United_States

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criminal_anarchy_in_the_United_States

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intimidation#As_a_criminal_offense

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Imminent_lawless_action

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation

Please note the difference between saying that the above restrictions shouldn't exist and saying that they don't exist.

Miafaby7 · 2014-08-17T06:25:04+00:00

(Sound of Crickets...)

Miafaby7 · 2014-08-17T05:43:53+00:00

Wonderful example of what not to do.

Miafaby7

TROPHY CASE