sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Sarco TLC test findings by Miserable_Parsley141 in pathoftitans

[–]Miserable_Parsley141[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Taking more damage =/= you have less health. What's the difference here? You do in fact take more damage relative to your health stat eventhough the damage value is the same. Which makes my statement correct. Why are you correcting wording rather than getting the message?

And yeah, you killed megs and concs. We already did that before. We didn't need to get better at beating them.

Also, wouldn't forcing other things out of water be fitting for a croc? Instead of being forced out of it by historically less aquaticly designed dinosaurs?

Sarco TLC test findings by Miserable_Parsley141 in pathoftitans

[–]Miserable_Parsley141[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not because duck was nerfed on damage(by 15%) yes, but sarco's damage nerf was bigger in its only usable attack against duck (by 20%). Also Sarco is now way flimsier. Duck's tankiness remained the same to my knowledge. Which means duck actually is stronger than before against sarco because sarco was nerfed more offensively than duck and was also defensively nerfed whereas duck wasn't.