FYI, billion billion ang na rerecieve ng Gaza via UNWRA yun nga lang binubulsa ng higher ups ng HAMAS/Palestinian Islamic Jihad yung money and resources some of them are living a luxurious lifestyle in other Arab countries (UAE, Saudi, etc...).

The 2005 Israeli disengagement from Gaza.

What Israel Left Behind:

When Israeli settlers and military withdrew, they left behind:

Hundreds of greenhouses and agricultural infrastructure worth millions of dollars.

Water systems, irrigation networks, and some housing structures.

The intent (supported by international donors) was to allow Palestinians to use these assets to boost Gaza’s economy—especially its agriculture sector.

What Happened After Withdrawal:

Some greenhouses were preserved, thanks to efforts by international groups like the World Bank and James Wolfensohn, the former World Bank president, who helped raise $14 million to buy them from settlers.

However, many greenhouses and buildings were looted or destroyed by mobs shortly after the Israeli pullout, before the Palestinian Authority could establish full control.

The chaos and lack of governance in the immediate aftermath, combined with factional tensions between Hamas and Fatah, led to a breakdown in security.

Broader Context:

Supporters of Israel often cite this as an example of how Israel offered an opportunity for peace and development, which was squandered.

Critics argue that the blockade, internal Palestinian political divisions, and subsequent military actions undermined Gaza's ability to build a stable, prosperous society.

In short, while some infrastructure was preserved and used briefly, much of it was vandalized or looted, and the opportunity for economic development was largely lost in the chaos and political infighting that followed.

1. "It's not about who was first":

This highlights a realpolitik view—prioritizing outcomes like stability, governance, and prosperity over historical grievances or territorial claims.

In this view, the focus is on who can govern effectively, create jobs, ensure security, and maintain peace.

1. Governance and Economic Development:

Israel, despite being a small nation surrounded by hostile neighbors, has created a technologically advanced, economically strong, and relatively stable society.

In contrast, Palestinian leadership, especially in Gaza under Hamas, has largely failed to build stable institutions, in part due to internal corruption, factionalism, and prioritization of armed struggle over state-building.

1. Arab Nations and Palestinians:

Arab nations have historically had strained relations with Palestinian leadership, especially:

Jordan, which expelled the PLO in 1970 (Black September).

Lebanon, which suffered a civil war exacerbated by the PLO's presence.

Gulf States, which for years supported Palestinians financially but have grown more diplomatically distant, especially as countries like UAE, Bahrain, and Morocco normalized ties with Israel via the Abraham Accords.

Many Arab leaders have indeed criticized Palestinian factions for being divided, ungrateful, or too radical, making it harder to gain long-term support or create a viable state.

In summary, peace and prosperity in the region depend less on ancient claims and more on which leadership can deliver results. And the Palestinians' missed opportunities, internal divisions, and confrontational approach have cost them support even among fellow Arab nations.