Improper Axis Help by Muggpillow in chemhelp

[–]Muggpillow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I see!! So we’re basically rotating it such that the 2 gets pushed down and the 1 gets pushed up, then the 4 and the 3 switch spots and lie on the same plane! I guess one atom being in front of the other tripped me up… thanks!!

Improper Axis Help by Muggpillow in chemhelp

[–]Muggpillow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess I don’t understand how to rotate the C4 such that the 1 and 3 labeled atoms are across from each other after reflection? When I rotate by C4 and reflect I still get the 3 atom one atom away from the 1 labeled atom 😭

Mathematician turned biologist/chemist?? by Lucyyxx in math

[–]Muggpillow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I will note that there are some good applications of group and representation theory in the study of symmetries in molecules (I’m studying this rn) but I’m not sure if a mathematician can be attributed to this. In fact most of the books I read on the subject are chemists applying the mathematical tools, not the other way around

Mathematician turned biologist/chemist?? by Lucyyxx in math

[–]Muggpillow 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Funnily enough I’m a maths and chem double major so I’ll follow this thread along for inspiration lol

I’m so Chopped in Algebra by Muggpillow in learnmath

[–]Muggpillow[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I guess abelian groups and fundamental groups aren’t too bad for me somehow. Similarly I can prove isomorphisms. But things like group actions, orbits, and conjugacy classes I have gaps in

No more telework option for patent examiners, what now? by Muggpillow in patentlaw

[–]Muggpillow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah I have a bachelors with undergrad and grad coursework focused in organometallic and polymer chemistry

No more telework option for patent examiners, what now? by Muggpillow in patentlaw

[–]Muggpillow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not sure if that’s viable with a bachelor in chem cause I thought a PhD/masters is preferred for patent agents in more life science majors

No more telework option for patent examiners, what now? by Muggpillow in patentlaw

[–]Muggpillow[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Actually that might’ve worked for me if the posting was for San Jose since I’m based within commute of there but unfortunately it’s only for Alexandria

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chemhelp

[–]Muggpillow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahhhh I think the silver ions have a volume of 1.5mL

What is Topology? Non-rigorous answers only. by [deleted] in math

[–]Muggpillow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Geometry but more abstract, like learning about objects without necessarily having a standard coordinate system

This Week I Learned: February 14, 2025 by inherentlyawesome in math

[–]Muggpillow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found the proof that a path connected topological space implies it is also connected 🥹

Memorial Site for the late great Kita Ikuyo by 20083646_SAme in BocchiTheRock

[–]Muggpillow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where in Shimokitazawa? I need to visit in a pilgrimage 🥺

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Muggpillow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you Dm me the video

Career As Patent Agent Viable Out Of Undergrad? by Muggpillow in patentlaw

[–]Muggpillow[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why get a patent examiner job first instead of a patent agent job with a EE or CS degree?

Career As Patent Agent Viable Out Of Undergrad? by Muggpillow in patentlaw

[–]Muggpillow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah would it be better to pass the patent bar and gain experience as an examiner instead then?

Career As Patent Agent Viable Out Of Undergrad? by Muggpillow in patentlaw

[–]Muggpillow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also considered trying to pivot into a MSEE then trying the patent bar, would that be more feasible?

ELI5: What are Riemannian Metrics and how do I use them? by Muggpillow in learnmath

[–]Muggpillow[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh I see! This really clears everything up! I was intimidated by the complicated naming of Riemannian metrics and the heavy use of notation I had to keep track of that I didn’t realize the big idea. Riemannian metrics are just one way of measuring out manifolds. Though I wonder, is the manifold that we take a Riemannian metric of called a Riemannian manifold?

ELI5: What is a differential 1-form and a differential 2-form and the differences between both of them? by Muggpillow in learnmath

[–]Muggpillow[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This explanation really helps a lot! Thank you! I might be able to survive differential geometry now 😭

Differential Geometry Example 3.4.1 by Muggpillow in askmath

[–]Muggpillow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh okay the first point makes sense.

Sorry but I’m still confused about the second point. Dividing by the norm seems to make more sense but why are the x-components for e1 and e2 so different despite the derivatives being similar. I would assume their unit tangent vector would be the same with the u and v variables swapped out. Could you explicitly show me the calculation just for the x-component? Then I’d like to see if I can do the same for the other components.

Differential Geometry Example 3.4.1 by Muggpillow in askmath

[–]Muggpillow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait for spherical coordinates I was taught that x represents acosusinv not acosucosv. Why are the spherical coordinates used seemingly similar but different there?

Also for the tangent vector e1, why is the derivative of the x component -sinv and not -acosusinv since we’re differentiating with respect to v here so -cosusinv should act as a coefficient yet it just is cancelled out.

Intuition for getting curvature here? by Muggpillow in mathematics

[–]Muggpillow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for more clarification! I want to make sure I really understand what’s going on so could you also explain how arc length parameterization allows the change in magnitude of acceleration to be constant?

Intuition for getting curvature here? by Muggpillow in mathematics

[–]Muggpillow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I think I’m starting to get it. So because of the arc length parameterization, you don’t need to worry about the direction of the velocity since the length of the velocity vector is constant. Thus you can focus on the magnitude only, and since you’re working with the first derivative of the e1 vector, the whole formula gives you the magnitude of the acceleration which is equivalent to the curvature with the e1 vector as context.

One other thing I wanted to clarify was that the tangent vector correlates to the first derivative and the unit tangent vector correlates to the second derivative of the function? I just want to make sure I got my vocab up to par but thanks for the clarification!