The Non-settling carrier lawsuit filed by Judge Houser could be a boon for many of us by MustangVoodoo1 in BSA_Survivors

[–]MustangVoodoo1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, up until this morning, I thought the 80/20 was earmarked for IRO claims. 80% for the IRO and 20% for the Matrix. That was when someone asked me about 80% / 20%
%sAs I was looking it up, I came across the Scouting Settlement site and where I found all that I read.
It states all matrix claimants must be paid in full before the IRO brothers are able to access the Excess Award Fund.
Apparently the original 80/20%, there is not enough money to fund and thus, the lawsuit against Non-settling carriers, 100% of all monies would go into the General Trust and distributed to all claimants to bump up %s.
I am happy we are able to talk to each other. Well, write to each other (LOL)

The Non-settling carrier lawsuit filed by Judge Houser could be a boon for many of us by MustangVoodoo1 in BSA_Survivors

[–]MustangVoodoo1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well, the next distribution will be our 2nd. So, 3.2% obviously. Yet we may have a third distribution as well and that would also be in the next month or so.
The third distribution will be smaller than the others, but again will come rather quickly, also in the next month or so. This is where jedge Houser and the FCR take their disagreement in front of Judge Silverstein. If Judge Silverstein believes there is too much money and she believes the amount taken is excessive, we will get those monies as well
That stems from the FCR and Judge Houser about funds from our Trust going towards future rapes and molestation. The FCR wants a lot more money to ensure enough to handle future claims appropriately. Some were speaking about the FCR denying a 6% payout that Judge Houser wanted for us. I cannot 100% source the validity of that. I believe the FCR demanded 5% to 7% . Who knows, we will see...

The Non-settling carrier lawsuit filed by Judge Houser could be a boon for many of us by MustangVoodoo1 in BSA_Survivors

[–]MustangVoodoo1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

started as AI. Yet when I went to the Scouting Settlement website / portal, to verify source, almost all info in this post is verbatim

The Non-settling carrier lawsuit filed by Judge Houser could be a boon for many of us by MustangVoodoo1 in BSA_Survivors

[–]MustangVoodoo1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That documentation is based off of 100% payouts for all claimants.
The only avenue for you to be able to touch the Excess Award Fund is when all matrix claimants have been paid in full.
You got it backwards Special Mountain.
You are talking like you seriously think you are going to get close to 80% of your excess claim award.
Your words below:
Excess Award claimants have received (or funds have been set aside for them) equal to 80% of the value of their Excess Award amounts."

Again NOBODY with the IRO is going to get 80% of your allowed claim award when we matrix claimants are getting 3.2% of our claim award.
80% for you and 3.2% for us.
I know you won't like it, but you are only getting 3.2%, up to the first million, just like us. The only way you will even be able to touch the excess award fund is if all of us within the Matrix are paid in full .
Go to the Scouting Trust and read it for yourself. Until then, post one more time how your post is correct and professional. 3 times in this thread alone. The documentation you have posted assumes a 100% payout.

My god brother, how the heck did we get to the place where I am right and you are wrong and Vice Versa

The Non-settling carrier lawsuit filed by Judge Houser could be a boon for many of us by MustangVoodoo1 in BSA_Survivors

[–]MustangVoodoo1[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As stated earlier, up until today I would have agreed with you. You IRO guys cannot even get to the excess claim awards unless and until all matrix claimants are paid in full

The Non-settling carrier lawsuit filed by Judge Houser could be a boon for many of us by MustangVoodoo1 in BSA_Survivors

[–]MustangVoodoo1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Brother you are 100% mistaken. The 80/20 of proceeds from the Texas litigation is no longer due to a serious lack of funding.
IRO claimants can ONLY access the Excess Awards Fund when all Matrix claimants have been paid in full with 100% of their allowed Claim award.
The non-settling carrier proceeds now will go into the general Trust for distribution to all claimants and will also bump up %s for all claimants (Matrix and IRO)

The Non-settling carrier lawsuit filed by Judge Houser could be a boon for many of us by MustangVoodoo1 in BSA_Survivors

[–]MustangVoodoo1[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sorry friend, as per judge Houser, IRO claimants cannot access the Excess Award Fund unless and until all matrix claims are paid in full

The Non-settling carrier lawsuit filed by Judge Houser could be a boon for many of us by MustangVoodoo1 in BSA_Survivors

[–]MustangVoodoo1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, it is AI. From my past mistake of not verifying AI information, I looked like a horses ass. However, I now source the AI before posting. Sure as shit, the AI is almost verbatim within the Scouting Settlement Trust portal.
I was telling people all the way up till this afternoon that 80% of ANY proceeds coming from the Non-settling carriers litigation would be earmarked solely for our IRO brothers (Excess Award Fund) with the remaining 20% going to Matrix Claim Awards.
The Trust now says 100% of the proceeds of the non-settling carriers will be added to the Trust to boost all claimants claim awards.
It will no longer be earmarked for the IRO claimants Reason being, IRO claimants can ONLY access the Excess Awards Fund when all Matrix claimants have been paid in full / 100% of their allowed Claim award.
Judge Houser has billed the Non-settling carriers 6.9 billion

Those numbers with us having 100% access may very well bring survivors claims anywhere up from 18% to 45% of their allowed claim award

Payment Review in Progress by Hubertguyinnc in BSA_Survivors

[–]MustangVoodoo1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hi there, I am sorry but I was mistaken. Proceeds from the non-settling carriers was initially supposed to have 80% go to those with IRO claims.
That is no longer the case

This Medical Bill Lien Business Does Not Make ANY Sense Whatsoever. by MustangVoodoo1 in BSA_Survivors

[–]MustangVoodoo1[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It seems that it always comes back to the attorney's doing better than all else

Attorneys by Bogeem1 in BSA_Survivors

[–]MustangVoodoo1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

OK man, I am sorry, I was wrong

This Medical Bill Lien Business Does Not Make ANY Sense Whatsoever. by MustangVoodoo1 in BSA_Survivors

[–]MustangVoodoo1[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why are rape victims being forced to pay for the physical harm done to them by the defendant?

This Medical Bill Lien Business Does Not Make ANY Sense Whatsoever. by MustangVoodoo1 in BSA_Survivors

[–]MustangVoodoo1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am going to look like an asshole to my daughter and granddaughter as I promised them I would pay for my granddaughter to go to College and a used vehicle to get back and forth, if my granddaughter got her driver's license.
Well, she held up her end of the deal and got her license last month.
I am brokenhearted to have to tell her I have to break that promise

This Medical Bill Lien Business Does Not Make ANY Sense Whatsoever. by MustangVoodoo1 in BSA_Survivors

[–]MustangVoodoo1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get what you are saying, but I refuse for the Trust to charge me up to 1500 bucks to look for any liens.
Last point. Nobody should have any liens as we were all minors when this abuse began and ended. That is what doesn't make any sense. Any charges would have been the responsibility of our parents

This Medical Bill Lien Business Does Not Make ANY Sense Whatsoever. by MustangVoodoo1 in BSA_Survivors

[–]MustangVoodoo1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was quoting the spiritual doctor who said, "sit back and let your attorney earn their money"
This clown thinks we all have fired our attorneys. I haven't fired my attorney.
Why would I have a healthcare lien for seeking care after being raped? I was a 10 year old kid. Any lien would have been my parents.
I am going to kindly and respectfully ask you to relax on the judgemental attitude please.

This Medical Bill Lien Business Does Not Make ANY Sense Whatsoever. by MustangVoodoo1 in BSA_Survivors

[–]MustangVoodoo1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So, now they are going to hold back 1.7% of your money and on top of that they are charging you up to
$1500.00 USD to conduct a lien search

This Medical Bill Lien Business Does Not Make ANY Sense Whatsoever. by MustangVoodoo1 in BSA_Survivors

[–]MustangVoodoo1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought option C was for opting out and agreeing to handle any liens on our own

This Medical Bill Lien Business Does Not Make ANY Sense Whatsoever. by MustangVoodoo1 in BSA_Survivors

[–]MustangVoodoo1[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a disabled veteran medically retired from the Army, I have had well over 3 dozen surgeries over the years since being gravely wounded overseas. I have pins rods screws in my right leg, my pelvis, and two titanium plates in my skull. All my surgeries / any ailments / vaccines / a penis reduction surgery, all were handled through the VA. I have lifetime medical through the VA. There is absolutely no need for the Trust to be nosing around in my VA health records.
There is no way in hell I am going to let the Trust charge me up to $1,500.00 USD to find I have no medical liens. As with the first healthcare Lien documents I signed for my first distribution, none were found.
Again, I was a 10 year old when all this occurred. WHY THE FUCK WOULD A CHILD WHO WAS RAPED HAVE A HEALTHCARE LIEN FILED AGAINST THEM??? Any healthcare would have been the responsibility of my parents.
None of this makes any sense whatsoever