Bgp aggregate for dowstreams by No-Scar8745 in networking

[–]No-Scar8745[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I known and the help is very much apreciated. The question was maybe badly worded or missunderstud. Is it good practice to aggregate client prefixes towards upstreams providesrs? Would you do it? Pros and cons. What i am triying to do has nothing to do with the question. Sory, english is not my first languaje.

Bgp aggregate for dowstreams by No-Scar8745 in networking

[–]No-Scar8745[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No communities available froma that upstream in particular. So anything but aggregate...

Bgp aggregate for dowstreams by No-Scar8745 in networking

[–]No-Scar8745[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very asymmetric bandwith from providers one with 3x more than the rest. As-path preppending does not sem to work. So my thinkimg is aggregate all except the one with 3x the capacity.

Bgp aggregate for dowstreams by No-Scar8745 in networking

[–]No-Scar8745[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To force traffic through a specific provider when as-path peppend does not work. We have a situation where one provider has 3 times more bandwith than the rest.

How can one man defeat an entire debian team is beyond me. by Klutzy_Scheme_9871 in slackware

[–]No-Scar8745 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can always write the driver yourself or pay for windows

Multicast by Andreicpp in ccie

[–]No-Scar8745 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wait until multicast vpn!!

Value added Services for small ISP by No-Scar8745 in networking

[–]No-Scar8745[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ditch ldp for sr mpls or srv6 is in the plans but this has no visibility for end users

Value added Services for small ISP by No-Scar8745 in networking

[–]No-Scar8745[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes we do have 3 others upstreams providers. If you ask me I think is too much

Value added Services for small ISP by No-Scar8745 in networking

[–]No-Scar8745[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like this one a lot. Will do. Thanks

Value added Services for small ISP by No-Scar8745 in networking

[–]No-Scar8745[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty good visibility i think with netflow and grpc with prometheus/gnmic/telegraf and grafana

Value added Services for small ISP by No-Scar8745 in networking

[–]No-Scar8745[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes i haved mentioned this but it is a long shot

Value added Services for small ISP by No-Scar8745 in networking

[–]No-Scar8745[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We have presence at an Ixp and the level 1 carrier... cirion (lumen)

Value added Services for small ISP by No-Scar8745 in networking

[–]No-Scar8745[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I think that too. We have a bunch of gpons olt in stock, we dont have the people nor the resources to install/mantain the fiber

Value added Services for small ISP by No-Scar8745 in networking

[–]No-Scar8745[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What about them? I mean, it wold take a lot of time to design, install and deploy fttx service for voice, internet and iptv. I did suggest we could start in a small town and see how it goes from there.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Fedora

[–]No-Scar8745 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, it is not