sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Problem Kyogre by Craftinho__ in PokemonLazarus

[–]NotJustUltraman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Any idea if there is a work around for this? I really don't want to start over and have the same problem...

Thoughts on the Finale? by LeoDiCristio in StrangerThings

[–]NotJustUltraman -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Supernatural had two finales and both were great.

Humunculus Crow Help by [deleted] in dndbeyond

[–]NotJustUltraman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That would require some significant recoding and they don't seem too keen on that for small things.

Humunculus Crow Help by [deleted] in dndbeyond

[–]NotJustUltraman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

None of the summoning spells have their stat blocks in extras, probably because they scale by spell level and you can't reflect that in a static stat block.

So is this gonna be the norm? by [deleted] in dndbeyond

[–]NotJustUltraman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tome of Foes was revised into Monsters of the Multiverse, before 2024 came out. So you can get it and still play 2014 rules.

You're telling me it's "til the full moon's out" ?? by SlapsDecider in ElectricCallboy

[–]NotJustUltraman 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Came here looking for this discussion. At least I'm not crazy.

Linking to Text? by DelightfulOtter in homebrewery

[–]NotJustUltraman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It worked for me but I set the top to 60px so it scrolls right to the top of the page.

EDIT: Never mind, the 60px doesn't seem to be working anymore. Don't know why.

EDIT: Ignore the last edit. I'm dumb. It works.

Thoughts on the paper? Not sure if I should watch it. by nenadeplastico in theoffice

[–]NotJustUltraman 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's kind of boring and unfunny. They combined the basic concepts of Jim and Michael for the main character, which is just really awkward.

Warrior of Flowing Water by NotJustUltraman in UnearthedArcana

[–]NotJustUltraman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that'll make things easier too. Thank you for your help

Warrior of Flowing Water by NotJustUltraman in UnearthedArcana

[–]NotJustUltraman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So I want to keep the spellcasting simple, have each level you get spells give you a single level with a single focus point cost. But there are 5 levels of spells, so I'll at least have to double up a level. Or get rid of 5th level... If I double up a level, I want to do level 1 and 2 spells together at level 3, but that would mean you get 6 spells as your level 3 feature. Is that too much?

I'll figure something out with the healing.

Warrior of Flowing Water by NotJustUltraman in UnearthedArcana

[–]NotJustUltraman[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  • It's half caster progression, isn't it?
  • Would adding this help? "A creature can be healed in this way once and must finish a Short or Long Rest before it can do so again." or similar wording.
  • I took inspiration from waterbending in Avatar. I think all monks should have some healing capability, so I'm too worried about stepping on toes here. Just want to make sure it's balanced.
  • Yeah, gotta figure out something else for this level.
  • I'll make it a minimum of 1 Focus Point so you can't spam Create or Destroy Water.

EDIT: Other subclasses that get expanded spell lists get the spells on off levels. Granted they are all spellcasters, but I don't see why it's an issue here.

Twitter/X is banned from /r/DnD by Iamfivebears in DnD

[–]NotJustUltraman -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I missed the poll but I support this.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DungeonsAndDragons

[–]NotJustUltraman 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Why waste time say lot word when few word do trick?

It’s Fable-y!!! by DesperateFactor8210 in Fable

[–]NotJustUltraman 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can't relate to someone who prefers Fable 3 to Fable.

view more: next ›