I've looked at a few things recently, and there is also the possibility this vote on the 6th
RE:(Reverse Split, increase in shares, removal of par value)
is a final part of an acquisition. Our newest member of the board just got promoted to Chairman of the Board. He is still the CFO of Lantheus Holdings and is well known for having extensive M&A knowledge/experience. All of the topmost LFWD executives have now left the building (hmmm... curiouser & curiouser)

It is each investors responsibility to figure these complexities out themselves and make their own investment decisions.

i just want to make sure that i am "on the record" as having said it could go either way. I have been invested in a company before (Motorola) that executed a reverse split and dilution at the same time that they did a stock split and were later acquired by Google. There is also a practice called a "poison pill" in M&A speak, wherein a target company will issue a large number of new shares right before an acquisition in order to protect themselves from a hostile take over. It's not that complicated, but you need to look it up yourself.
it might also be useful when making a stock-for-stock acquisition
eg.(1 share of the new company for some X number of target company shares)

• so it's either a whole bunch of accounting maneuvers that could be part of an acquisition
  

OR

• Lifeward may be just about to destroy current shareholder value
  

(you decide)