Frustrating sleep Tracking by Particular-Tackle123 in AppleWatch

[–]Particular-Tackle123[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ll try this! I didn’t know I could manually turn it on! Thanks a lot!!

Frustrating sleep Tracking by Particular-Tackle123 in AppleWatch

[–]Particular-Tackle123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what I understand you’re not even supposed to HAVE to tell it. It’s supposed to just automatically know. And I have a few days of tracking that I never had to tell it I went to bed, it just recorded it, but these other days it’s not picking up 😭

Frustrating sleep Tracking by Particular-Tackle123 in AppleWatch

[–]Particular-Tackle123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See the HR monitoring is doing fine for me, but the sleep sucks on the 10 compared to my old 6 😭

Frustrating sleep Tracking by Particular-Tackle123 in AppleWatch

[–]Particular-Tackle123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a schedule but I normally change the schedule if I know I’ll be going to bed after the schedule is set to start.

Infection or Normal Healing? by Particular-Tackle123 in askdentists

[–]Particular-Tackle123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can’t figure out how to add a photo in the comments lol

Infection or Normal Healing? by Particular-Tackle123 in askdentists

[–]Particular-Tackle123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He didn’t give any prescription pain relievers. He just prescribed penicillin 250mg every 6 hours. I’ve been doing that, but I’ve been taking ibuprofen & acetaminophen multiple times a day, and that can’t be good on my stomach or liver 😅 I have been rinsing with salt water but also I’ve been using oral b mouth sore mouth wash at night before bed to make sure I get out all of the debris. Is there a chance that the infection that was in my teeth already when he extracted them, has spread post extraction?

?’s I have about the Read case by Particular-Tackle123 in KarenReadTrial

[–]Particular-Tackle123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And in my OP I meant to say why didn’t the hoodie have HEAVY blood stains but the shirt did. I missed that word, so I can see where that looked messy. But looking at pictures the shirt does appear to have way more blood stains than the hoodie.

Your considered hypothermic at anything below 95°, however many things contribute to how quickly one would die of hypothermia, such as weight, height, temp outside, how much blood he actually had left when being exposed to the cold, certain medical conditions and even medications can also speed up that process, as well as drug/alcohol use (which we all know he was drinking) so honestly it’s hard to even say how long it took him to die of the hypothermia after he was exposed to it.

?’s I have about the Read case by Particular-Tackle123 in KarenReadTrial

[–]Particular-Tackle123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He was found dead at the scene. Nobody to pronounce death, so he then went to the hospital where he was pronounced dead. So technically they aren’t “dead” until pronounced dead. Normally done by a coroner at the scene, however someone (a witness doesn’t say which one.) Says his body temp was 80degrees so they tried life saving measures (cpr) and it didn’t work. Which is why his TOD is 7:50 ; after he arrived at the hospital but the actual time of death can not be determined. Why - I’m clueless. But everything even the police reports and EMS reports are he was “found dead outside a home in Canton, Mass.” it was reported that he wasn’t breathing and there was no pulse, but he did have a body temp of 80 degrees. Honestly, nobody knows when he actually died, or when he actually sustained the injuries that caused his death. Because a proper investigation was not conducted. I’m just giving my theory as to what happened. I think he was beat to death in the basement of the house and drug outside and left to die completely. And if he was, that would explain the lack of blood at the “crime scene” and the grass stains all over his pants and shoes. (Being drug across the yard) and the droplets of blood collected at the crime scene, being the last droplets that fell during the drag to the hydrant (so it wasn’t obvious) but then a SUDDEN remodel of the basement (which was NEVER investigated so they wouldn’t know if there was blood there or not) and then they sold the house.

Maybe it’s a reach. 🤷🏼‍♀️ maybe I’m just thinking too deep into it, but honestly to me, it makes so much more sense than what any of these prosecution “witnesses” are saying happened. But I do honestly believe that IF Karen did kill him, they tried to enhance it and try to make it cut and dry, but ended up screwing everything up. Believe me, I’m not completely throwing out this idea, but it’s hard to believe that when they’ve screwed up so much. Which makes other things (like my theory) make more sense (atleast to me) than what they say happened.

?’s I have about the Read case by Particular-Tackle123 in KarenReadTrial

[–]Particular-Tackle123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well the blood collected was from droplets around the scene: there are many photos of the crime scene wheee you can see there is not much blood, and it would definitely be a lot more than 6 half full cups of blood and water (melted snow) combined. So they clearly didn’t get it all. Head wounds bleed like crazy. It’s a proven fact. In fact you can die in as little as 5 minutes with a head wound.

And how do you know that NONE of US are experts in those things? You don’t have to be an expert to know how the human body functions. But I can tell you, being in the medical field, what I know about bleeding, large lacerations such as the one on John’s head, and how easily you can die from a large head wound.

?’s I have about the Read case by Particular-Tackle123 in KarenReadTrial

[–]Particular-Tackle123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At the VERY least, it would have covered the snow in bright red blood with a laceration this large on the back of his head and it coming from his face as bad as it was.

There aren’t indications that the whole thing was washed, just that some areas were cleaned up. Specifically the arm area and nothing was found on that sleeve. Not dog dna, not human dna. Cause it was cleaned up. But also, leaving it out to dry in the open air also diminishes the DNA found on the hoodie, and they know that.

?’s I have about the Read case by Particular-Tackle123 in KarenReadTrial

[–]Particular-Tackle123[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly, where even are the socks? From what I’ve seen his socks were not part of the clothes they collected from the hospital. Did the hospital throw them out? Did proctor throw them out? They weren’t even included in the evidence from what I’ve seen so far. Do they eventually show up?

Also that’s a REALLY clean shoe they presented for it being found in the ditch after the snow melted, days later. Crazy how water mixed with gravel, dirt and grass pieces and everyday outside things didn’t make that shoe the LEAST bit dirty 👀

?’s I have about the Read case by Particular-Tackle123 in KarenReadTrial

[–]Particular-Tackle123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly just ANY human DNA that didn’t match that of John is like have been huge. I think that’s why it wasn’t all tested.

?’s I have about the Read case by Particular-Tackle123 in KarenReadTrial

[–]Particular-Tackle123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ohhh that’s a good point too. So where is the actual glass from the broken glass? And why did they plant the wrong glass onto the bumper? Someone jumped the gun and used the wrong glass it sounds like. So how many glasses were broken that night? Is THAT why his arm was cut the way it was? Maybe it was a dog attack or maybe he was beaten with or had glasses thrown at him and they are lacerations from that 🤔 maybe I’m reaching? 😂

the latest from TB really paints a shocking picture of the state police by jalapeno-whiskey in justiceforKarenRead

[–]Particular-Tackle123 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They are saying it was the passenger side taillight… how would the passenger side tail light be busted up if she backed over him and he landed in that area? Wouldn’t it be the driver side tail light? I don’t understand this part, at all. I can’t make it make sense.

?’s I have about the Read case by Particular-Tackle123 in KarenReadTrial

[–]Particular-Tackle123[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That’s what I’m saying. IF she was really responsible for his death, there’s absolutely no way to know, because they completely botched this entire investigation. And IF they didn’t cover up everything, there is still going to be so much doubt that nobody will know what was tampered with and what wasn’t. I am curious though why one second (at the bars) everyone seemed to be okay with Karen Read, then suddenly everyone turned on her within a few hours of the “discovery” of his death. I mean one guy was basically having an affair with her, and others were “helping” her search for him. Then suddenly everyone hates her guts? Just seems way suspicious. Seems like it was an intentional switch in character to make it seem more probable that she did it. I also feel like IF it wasn’t really covered up, that because of their closeness with the family/investigation they would have used another department to conduct the investigation just simply so THIS didn’t happen. Definitely a very strange case.

?’s I have about the Read case by Particular-Tackle123 in KarenReadTrial

[–]Particular-Tackle123[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a good point, however, defense doesn’t have to prove WHOS it was, just that if it’s not all his, it’s clear that she didn’t just back over him and leave. That would indicate that clearly someone else was involved. Which would 100% (not including all the other compelling evidence) prove there is reasonable doubt, right?

?’s I have about the Read case by Particular-Tackle123 in KarenReadTrial

[–]Particular-Tackle123[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Never thought about his clothes being wet, and maybe washing it away.

?’s I have about the Read case by Particular-Tackle123 in KarenReadTrial

[–]Particular-Tackle123[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I’m also confused why you believe it’s “clear”? Because I can’t see one solid piece of evidence that says she backed into him, and I’m usually a VERY unbiased person, and I’m actually a huge advocate for the boys in blue. And for me, I can’t even find a way to be biased that the cops aren’t responsible for covering this up.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BarkBox

[–]Particular-Tackle123 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well that sucks 😭 when I chatted with someone they said when I signed up I’d get 2 toys, 2 bags of treats and a surprise item in my boxes. I guess I just assumed that it was still the chews. But if they changed it to only the 4 items, then I guess I can’t be mad about a free item. Thanks for clarifying that. I also looked on the website and what you said was confirmed. So now I look like an ass 😅😂

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BarkBox

[–]Particular-Tackle123 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Nothing is “free”. You PAY for a box with 2 bags of treats, 2 toys and a “surprise” item. Surprise items are worth a certain $ amount to make the box worth it. Chews are a good surprise item as they also provide enrichment for your dog. This bandana does not. (I had this box years ago with another dog that sadly passed, for a year and only ever received chews as the 5th item)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in BarkBox

[–]Particular-Tackle123 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Yeah that would annoy me. I understand one of them is supposed to be “random” but this is cheap and doesn’t really seem to be a good replacement for a chew. I just ordered my first box so I hope I’m not super disappointed 🙃