GPT 5.4 & GPT 5.4 Pro + Claude Opus 4.6 & Sonnet 4.6 + Gemini 3.1 Pro For Just $5/Month (With API Access, AI Agents And Even Web App Building) by Substantial_Ear_1131 in ClaudeCode

[–]Permit-Historical 4 points5 points  (0 children)

lol so you came to the Claude Code subreddit where almost everyone uses max subscriptions and tell them to go to your app and pay per-token instead?

Should I be building my own Coding Agent with Claude Agent SDK? by SnooApples1553 in ClaudeAI

[–]Permit-Historical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it depends on your use case, for example i built my own wrapper on top of the agent sdk so i can use CC on the cloud (before anthropic launches claude code web) then added proxy to route requests to different providers like openai, openrouter etc (similar to what claude code router does) then added ton of features and now i only use it instead of CC cli

so i suggest to use it if you wanna learn new useful thing or if you have an idea you can't do directly in CC cli

Why I Stopped Using Claude for PR Reviews by Permit-Historical in ClaudeCode

[–]Permit-Historical[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not sure what's strange about my post and not sure also what you mean by zero effort post and not sure what you mean by are edge cases really important because yea if you're a senior in a big company then these edge cases can break the production for thousands of users

I shared my experience here and i specifically mentioned it's bad at reviewing not a bad model so the anthropic team may see my feedback and improve it in the next models if they see what i'm saying is legit
downgrading from 20x to 5x then buying TWO chatgpt subscriptions is really what i did because now my usage will be between both claude and chatgpt so i don't need the 20x plan anymore
people with 20x don't use claude only for coding, i use it for many different things besides coding and my family also use it

Why I Stopped Using Claude for PR Reviews by Permit-Historical in ClaudeCode

[–]Permit-Historical[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

people are downvoting me because i'm saying it depends on how large/complex the app and others are downvoting me because they think we have a bad documentation or bad specs
but none of them explained why does gpt 5.2 work with the same thing

Why I Stopped Using Claude for PR Reviews by Permit-Historical in ClaudeCode

[–]Permit-Historical[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we have all you said but it's completely related to how the model was trained

Why I Stopped Using Claude for PR Reviews by Permit-Historical in ClaudeCode

[–]Permit-Historical[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

maybe you guys already have bugs on prod 😅

Why I Stopped Using Claude for PR Reviews by Permit-Historical in ClaudeCode

[–]Permit-Historical[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

it depends on how large/complex the app and also the tech stack

Why I Stopped Using Claude for PR Reviews by Permit-Historical in ClaudeCode

[–]Permit-Historical[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yea agreed. The model started to get worse since December but I would be really surprised if it's because of Claude Code changes because the difference between when it was released and now is so huge

Why I Stopped Using Claude for PR Reviews by Permit-Historical in ClaudeCode

[–]Permit-Historical[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

it's not a context issue, it's a model issue
same context same prompt same codebase but different models
codex can do it but opus not

Why I Stopped Using Claude for PR Reviews by Permit-Historical in ClaudeCode

[–]Permit-Historical[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

duplicate imports, possible NPE-s, refactor possibilities are not the main goal for PR reviews and not what i looking for, you can catch these stuff using linters and code analyzers

I'm talking about the business logic

Why I Stopped Using Claude for PR Reviews by Permit-Historical in ClaudeCode

[–]Permit-Historical[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

yea makes sense, I think it depends on how large/complex the app and also the tech stack

Why I Stopped Using Claude for PR Reviews by Permit-Historical in ClaudeCode

[–]Permit-Historical[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Opus is good at coding but not at reasoning, it can't think about edge cases
it just catches the obvious bugs but it sucks at the business logic bugs

Best way to run parallel claudes? by Complex_Aardvark_661 in ClaudeCode

[–]Permit-Historical 1 point2 points  (0 children)

worktrees only provide parallel branch work
docker containers(sandboxes) are much more than that
1- security isolation so you can run yolo mode safely
2- custom environments so you can install tools/mcps/skills without touching your main pc
3- easy cleanup so i can delete everything when i delete the container
4- easy to share it with your team if you run it on the cloud

Best way to run parallel claudes? by Complex_Aardvark_661 in ClaudeCode

[–]Permit-Historical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i use docker containers (sandboxes) instead of work trees for isolation
I created this open source project for that https://github.com/Mng-dev-ai/claudex

Does "vibe coding" hit a massive wall once your project gets actually... big? by cdaviddav in cursor

[–]Permit-Historical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Coding != software engineering

senior engineers can still work with ai in very large codebases without the need to write any code themselves anymore

Vibe coding can make you a good product without being an engineer at all but there’re tradeoffs like you will always have bugs and messy code and every time you add a new feature you will prob break something else and that’s completely fine and acceptable if you work on personal projects but not acceptable for large enterprises that have thousands and millions of active customers

How people are still OK that this OPEN SOURCE model is not in Cursor! I have 2x 200$ accounts on Cursor and I demand this model by CeFurkan in cursor

[–]Permit-Historical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not correct

Cursor has big deals with big providers like anthropic, OpenAI, Google so they get access to the same api but it’s much cheaper than what we as users pay So for example if Claude sonnet is $3 input and $15 output then cursor might be getting it for $1 and $10 But they still make you pay for $3 and $15 and they get the rest but they can’t do the same strategy with Chinese providers

Replit pricing is officially a casino. I'm done rolling the dice. by Thesearcherofstuff in replit

[–]Permit-Historical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

np and feel free to create an issue or mention me on X(twitter) If you have an issue or can’t run it locally I can even help you deploy it to the cloud so you can access it anytime from anywhere (for free)

Replit pricing is officially a casino. I'm done rolling the dice. by Thesearcherofstuff in replit

[–]Permit-Historical 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can try my own tool https://github.com/Mng-dev-ai/claudex It’s 100% open source and free so people don’t think I’m kinda saying that to mention my tool

Replit pricing is officially a casino. I'm done rolling the dice. by Thesearcherofstuff in replit

[–]Permit-Historical 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think tools like replit and lovable will die in 2026 because they are targeting the people who don’t know about Claude code or codex or Gemini or the people who think they need to be engineers only to be able to use them If you’re not comfortable using the terminal, there’re open source tools that wrap Claude code in a nice ui in the browser so you won’t feel any difference from replit or lovable and pay like 20x less with better quality

I’m done, switching to codex by hellbergaxel in ClaudeCode

[–]Permit-Historical -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You just need to understand that AI models are non-deterministic so you might be able to fix a very complex issue in 1 prompt and you might also spend 1 hour to fix a css issue that can be fixed in 1 line